Literature DB >> 27399999

Experience With Opportunistic Salpingectomy in a Large, Community-Based Health System in the United States.

Christine Garcia1, Maria Martin, Lue-Yen Tucker, Liisa Lyon, Mary Anne Armstrong, Sally McBride-Allen, Ramey D Littell, Amy Alabaster, Tina Raine-Bennett, C Bethan Powell.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the trend in uptake of salpingectomy at the time of hysterectomy and assess physicians' attitudes toward the practice.
METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study using the electronic medical record to identify women 18 years of age or older undergoing hysterectomy from June 2011 to May 2014 in a large integrated health care delivery system. The primary outcome was the change in rate of opportunistic salpingectomy over time and after a systemwide practice recommendation was issued in May 2013. Secondary outcomes included data on blood loss, operating time, and length of stay.
RESULTS: Of the 12,143 hysterectomies performed over the 3-year study period, 7,498 were performed without oophorectomy. There was a statistically significant rise in rate of salpingectomy over time from 14.7% for June 2011 to May 2012 to 44.6% from June 2012 to May 2013 and to 72.7% from June 2013 to May 2014 (P<.001). Sixty-one percent of laparoscopic hysterectomies were performed with salpingectomy, whereas only 25% of abdominal and 17% of vaginal hysterectomies had salpingectomies. Median estimated blood loss was lower in the salpingectomy group, 100 compared with 150 mL (P<.01). There was a significantly shorter median operating time (147 compared with 154 minutes, P=.002) for laparoscopic hysterectomy with bilateral salpingectomy compared with laparoscopic hysterectomy alone.
CONCLUSION: Rates of salpingectomy increased significantly over time, consistent with the high reported acceptance rate reported by health care providers and highlighting the importance of physician education to improve compliance with risk-reducing clinical strategies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27399999     DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001531

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  13 in total

1.  Feasibility of Complete Salpingectomy Compared With Standard Postpartum Tubal Ligation at Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Akila Subramaniam; Christina T Blanchard; Britt K Erickson; Jeff Szychowski; Charles A Leath; Joseph R Biggio; Warner K Huh
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 7.661

2.  Feasibility of prophylactic salpingectomy during vaginal hysterectomy.

Authors:  Danielle D Antosh; Rachel High; Heidi W Brown; Sallie S Oliphant; Husam Abed; Nisha Philip; Cara L Grimes
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  Incidental (Prophylactic) Salpingectomy at Benign Gynecologic Surgery and Cesarean Section: a Survey of Practice in Austria.

Authors:  F L Potz; G Tomasch; S Polterauer; R Laky; C Marth; K Tamussino
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 2.915

4.  Successful completion of total and partial salpingectomy at the time of cesarean delivery.

Authors:  Kristiana Lehn; Linda Gu; Mitchell D Creinin; Melissa J Chen
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2018-06-20       Impact factor: 3.375

Review 5.  Risk-reducing salpingectomy: Let us be opportunistic.

Authors:  Kara C Long Roche; Nadeem R Abu-Rustum; Mlica Nourmoussavi; Oliver Zivanovic
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2017-03-23       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Feasibility of Risk Reducing Salpingo-Oophorectomy at the Time of Abdominal Surgery for Correction of Pelvic Organ Prolapse and Urinary Incontinence.

Authors:  Ali Azadi; James A Bradley; Greg J Marchand; Douglas J Lorenz; David Doering; Donald R Ostergard
Journal:  Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther       Date:  2021-01-30

7.  Hysterectomy with opportunistic salpingectomy versus hysterectomy alone.

Authors:  Laura A M van Lieshout; Miranda P Steenbeek; Joanne A De Hullu; M Caroline Vos; Saskia Houterman; Jack Wilkinson; Jurgen Mj Piek
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-08-28

8.  Should national societies recommend opportunistic salpingectomy?

Authors:  Karl Tamussino
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 4.401

Review 9.  Major clinical research advances in gynecologic cancer in 2016: 10-year special edition.

Authors:  Dong Hoon Suh; Miseon Kim; Kidong Kim; Hak Jae Kim; Kyung Hun Lee; Jae Weon Kim
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2017-03-24       Impact factor: 4.401

Review 10.  Bilateral salpingectomy to reduce the risk of ovarian/fallopian/peritoneal cancer in women at average risk: a position statement of the Korean Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology (KSOG).

Authors:  Miseon Kim; Young-Han Kim; Yong Beom Kim; Jayeon Kim; Jae-Weon Kim; Mi Hye Park; Joo Hyun Park; Jeong Ho Rhee; Myong Cheol Lim; Joon-Seok Hong
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Sci       Date:  2018-09-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.