Elisabeth Hartl1, Jan Rémi2, Christian Vollmar3, Joanna Goc4, Anna Mira Loesch5, Axel Rominger6, Soheyl Noachtar7. 1. Epilepsy Center, Department of Neurology, University of Munich, Munich, Germany. Electronic address: elisabeth.hartl@med.uni-muenchen.de. 2. Epilepsy Center, Department of Neurology, University of Munich, Munich, Germany. Electronic address: jan.remi@med.uni-muenchen.de. 3. Epilepsy Center, Department of Neurology, University of Munich, Munich, Germany. Electronic address: christian.vollmar@med.uni-muenchen.de. 4. Epilepsy Center, Department of Neurology, University of Munich, Munich, Germany. Electronic address: joanna.goc@med.uni-muenchen.de. 5. Epilepsy Center, Department of Neurology, University of Munich, Munich, Germany. Electronic address: annamira.loesch@med.uni-muenchen.de. 6. Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Munich, Munich, Germany. Electronic address: axel.rominger@med.uni-muenchen.de. 7. Epilepsy Center, Department of Neurology, University of Munich, Munich, Germany. Electronic address: noa@med.uni-muenchen.de.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The study aimed to assess the relevance of interictal temporal glucose hypometabolism in patients with extratemporal epilepsy (ETE) by analyzing its association with a seizure semiology suggestive for temporal seizure involvement and the presence of temporal interictal epileptiform discharges (IEDs). METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the database of our epilepsy monitoring unit for patients with ETE, in whom long-term EEG-video-monitoring and [(18)F] fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) had been performed. The localization of IEDs and the glucose hypometabolism were compared. RESULTS: Almost half (46%) of the 63 ETE patients had IEDs localized in the temporal lobe. Most patients (87.5%; 7/8) with temporal IEDs and an ipsitemporal hypometabolism showed seizure semiology suggestive of temporal or limbic system involvement in contrast to only 31.0% (9/29, p=0.01) in patients without temporal IEDs nor temporal hypometabolism. Those patients also showed an ictal seizure pattern spread into the ipsitemporal lobe, compared with 75.9% (22/29, n.s.) in patients without temporal IEDs nor temporal hypometabolism. Both, extratemporal (ipsilateral in 82.1%; 23/28 patients) and temporal (ipsilateral in 78.6%; 11/14 patients) hypometabolism significantly (p<0.05) lateralized to the epileptogenic hemisphere. CONCLUSION: The common temporal glucose hypometabolism in ETE patients reflects a remote epileptic dysfunction arising from extratemporal epileptogenic zones. Thus, interpretation of interictal FDG-PET results requires consideration of EEG results and seizure semiology to avoid false localization particularly in non-lesional epilepsy.
OBJECTIVE: The study aimed to assess the relevance of interictal temporal glucose hypometabolism in patients with extratemporal epilepsy (ETE) by analyzing its association with a seizure semiology suggestive for temporal seizure involvement and the presence of temporal interictal epileptiform discharges (IEDs). METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the database of our epilepsy monitoring unit for patients with ETE, in whom long-term EEG-video-monitoring and [(18)F] fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) had been performed. The localization of IEDs and the glucose hypometabolism were compared. RESULTS: Almost half (46%) of the 63 ETE patients had IEDs localized in the temporal lobe. Most patients (87.5%; 7/8) with temporal IEDs and an ipsitemporal hypometabolism showed seizure semiology suggestive of temporal or limbic system involvement in contrast to only 31.0% (9/29, p=0.01) in patients without temporal IEDs nor temporal hypometabolism. Those patients also showed an ictal seizure pattern spread into the ipsitemporal lobe, compared with 75.9% (22/29, n.s.) in patients without temporal IEDs nor temporal hypometabolism. Both, extratemporal (ipsilateral in 82.1%; 23/28 patients) and temporal (ipsilateral in 78.6%; 11/14 patients) hypometabolism significantly (p<0.05) lateralized to the epileptogenic hemisphere. CONCLUSION: The common temporal glucose hypometabolism in ETE patients reflects a remote epileptic dysfunction arising from extratemporal epileptogenic zones. Thus, interpretation of interictal FDG-PET results requires consideration of EEG results and seizure semiology to avoid false localization particularly in non-lesional epilepsy.