Literature DB >> 27398892

Most 30-day Readmissions After Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Are Not Due to Surgical Site-Related Issues: An Analysis of 17,088 Patients.

Andre M Samuel1, Michael C Fu1, Jason O Toy2, Adam M Lukasiewicz2, Matthew L Webb2, Daniel D Bohl3, Bryce A Basques3, Todd J Albert1, Jonathan N Grauer2.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A retrospective study of patients undergoing anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) in the prospective National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the most common reasons for readmission within 30 days after elective ACDF. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: ACDF is a commonly performed surgery that is safe and effective for treating a variety of cervical spine pathologies. With new quality-based reimbursements tied to readmissions within 30 days of discharge, better understanding of the causes of readmissions is, however, needed.
METHODS: Patients undergoing ACDF in the NSQIP database from 2012 to 2014 were reviewed. The overall rate of readmission and documented reasons for readmission were collected. Multivariate regression was then used to determine risk factors for readmissions.
RESULTS: A total of 17,088 patients undergoing elective ACDF were identified. There were 545 (3.2%) readmissions within 30 postoperative days. Of the readmitted patients, 293 (53.8%) were readmitted for nonsurgical site-related reasons, with neuropsychiatric (n = 44), cardiovascular (n = 39), and pneumonia (n = 37) being the most common reasons. A total of 184 patients (33.8%) were readmitted for surgical site-related reasons, with surgical site infection (n = 42), hemorrhage/hematoma (n = 42), and dysphagia (n = 32) being the most common reasons. A total of 84 patients (15.6%) had undocumented reasons for readmission. In multivariate analysis, only older age and higher American Society of Anesthesiologists class were independently associated with readmissions.
CONCLUSION: Most readmissions after ACDF were due to nonsurgical site-related reasons, suggesting the importance of careful patient selection, aggressive preoperative medical optimization, and adequate postoperative management. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27398892     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001775

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  5 in total

1.  Higher reoperation rate following cervical disc replacement in a retrospective, long-term comparative study of 715 patients.

Authors:  Martin Skeppholm; Thomas Henriques; Tycho Tullberg
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Trends in National Use of Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion from 2006 to 2016.

Authors:  Hannah K Weiss; Jonathan T Yamaguchi; Roxanna M Garcia; Wellington K Hsu; Zachary A Smith; Nader S Dahdaleh
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2020-01-28       Impact factor: 2.104

3.  Factors Associated With Extended Length of Stay and 90-Day Readmission Rates Following ACDF.

Authors:  Brian L Dial; Valentine R Esposito; Richard Danilkowicz; Jeffrey O'Donnell; Barrie Sugarman; Daniel J Blizzard; Melissa E Erickson
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2019-05-20

4.  Risk Factors of Unplanned Readmission after Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Young Ju Lee; Pyung Goo Cho; Keung Nyun Kim; Sang Hyun Kim; Sung Hyun Noh
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2022-09       Impact factor: 3.052

5.  Comparative Analysis of 30-Day Readmission, Reoperation, and Morbidity Between Lumbar Disc Arthroplasty Performed in the Inpatient and Outpatient Settings Utilizing the ACS-NSQIP Dataset.

Authors:  Austen David Katz; Dean Cosmo Perfetti; Alan Job; Max Willinger; Jeffrey Goldstein; Daniel Kiridly; Peter Olivares; Alexander Satin; David Essig
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2020-07-31
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.