| Literature DB >> 27398000 |
Fatma M Elhusseini1, Mohamed-Ahdy A A Saad2, Nahla Anber3, Doaa Elghannam4, Mohamed-Ahmed Sobh5, Aziza Alsayed6, Sara El-Dusoky6, Hussein Sheashaa7, Hassan Abdel-Ghaffar4, Mohamed Sobh8.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Long-term evaluation of cisplatin induced nephrotoxicity and the probable renal protective activities of stem cells are lacking up until now. We evaluated the early and long-term role of human adipose derived mesenchymal stem cells (ADMSCs) in prevention or amelioration of cisplatin induced acute kidney injury (AKI) in Sprague-Dawley rats. For this, we determined the kidney tissue level of oxidative stress markers in conjugation with a renal histopathological scoring system of both acute and chronic renal changes.Entities:
Keywords: Acute kidney injury in rats; Adipose mesenchymal stem cells; Cisplatin; Oxidative stress markers.; Renal fibrosis
Year: 2016 PMID: 27398000 PMCID: PMC4929892
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Stem Cells Regen Med ISSN: 0973-7154
Primers for Adipogenic and osteogenic differentiation RT-PCR of human adipose derived mesenchymal stem cells
| Adiponectin | TCCTGCCAGTAACAGGGAAG | GGTTGGCGATTACCCGTTTG | ||
| adipocyte lipid-binding protein (ALBP) | TACCTGGAAACTTGTCTCCAGTGAA | CCATTTCTGCACATGTACCAGGACA | ||
| Lipoprotein Lipase | CTGCTGGCGTAGCAGGAAGT | GCTGGAAAGTGCCTCCATTG | ||
| Lipten | TGACACCAAAACCCTCATCA | TCATTGGCTATCTGCAGCAC | ||
| Osteocalcin | ACACTCCTCGCCCTATTG | GATGTGGTCAGCCAACTC | ||
Figure (1).
Figure (2).
Figure 3:
Figure 4:
Figure 5:ADMSCs’ effects on renal function and tissue oxidative stress markers level in cisplatin- induced nephrotoxicity on long term. (mean ± SD)
| Day 4 | 0.47±0.11 | 1.92±0.04* | 1.89i0.12* | 1.02±0.11*° |
| Day 7 | 0.48±0.13 | 1.61±0.06*‡ | 1.62±0.04*‡ | 0.85±0.11*°‡ |
| Day 11 | 0.48±0.18 | 0.97±0.14*‡† | 0.98±0.18*‡† | 0.70±0.08*°‡ |
| Day 30 | 0.43±0.11 | 0.76±0.04*‡† | 0.79±0.05*‡† | 0.56±0.07*°‡† |
| Day 4 | 1.600±0.860 | 0.007±0.002* | 0.008±0.002* | 0.017±0.009*° |
| Day 7 | 1.600±0.760 | 0.014±0.001*‡ | 0.012±0.003*‡ | 0.045±0.012*°‡ |
| Day 11 | 1.600±0.790 | 0.054±0.016*‡† | 0.056±0.020*‡† | 0.650±0.117*°‡† |
| Day 30 | 1.600±0.350 | 0.340±0.240*‡†• | 0.360±0.320*‡†• | 0.860±0.243*°‡† |
| Day 4 | 054.36±03.31 | 266.70±08.70* | 265.30±08.60* | 097.80±07.67*° |
| Day 7 | 053.39±04.51 | 228.70±l8.00*‡ | 236.00±l5.00*‡ | 076.40±04.30*‡ |
| Day 11 | 054.43±03.91 | 137.40±14.70*‡† | 138.60±l6.30*‡† | 068.34±04.60*°‡† |
| Day 30 | 054.55±03.62 | 111.46±11.50*‡†• | 112.58±08.40*‡†• | 068.34±04.60*°‡† |
| Day 4 | 14.50±3.43 | 67.40±3.40* | 69.50±4.80* | 34.20±8.54*° |
| Day 7 | 14.50±3.89 | 65.10±4.54* | 63.20±3.87* | 25.40±2.86*°‡ |
| Day 11 | 14.60±2.56 | 34.10±4.70*‡† | 37.20±4.60*‡† | 17.30±3.82°‡† |
| Day 30 | 14.50±2.46 | 32.80±5.10*‡† | 33.20±5.40*‡† | 16.32±3.65°‡† |
| Day 4 | 5.36±0.17 | 0.26±0.03* | 0.27±0.05* | 0.77±0.03*° |
| Day 7 | 5.38±1.15 | 0.53±0.04*‡ | 0.56±0.05*‡ | 2.56±0.05*°‡ |
| Day 11 | 5.35±0.18 | 1.38±0.42*‡† | 1.35±0.35*‡† | 3.53±0.21*°‡† |
| Day 30 | 5.39±0.35 | 1.92±0.04*‡†• | 1.95±0.08*‡†• | 4.12±0.22*°‡†• |
| Day 4 | 20.86±1.24 | 3.25±0.64* | 3.70±0.65* | 6.85±0.52*° |
| Day 7 | 20.82±1.64 | 6.24±0.57*‡ | 6.46±0.62*‡ | 10.67±0.38*°‡ |
| Day 11 | 20.78±1.28 | 9.96±0.30*‡† | 9.94±0.52*‡† | 15.62±0.43*°‡† |
| Day 30 | 20.73±0.84 | 15.24±0.46*‡†• | 15.43±0.52*‡†• | 18.67±0.42*°‡†• |
Significant difference compared to corresponding Significant * control, ° cisplatin groups
Significant difference compared to intra-group day4‡, day7†, day11• by Kruskal-Wallis test at P≤0.05
Figure 6:
Figure 7:ADMSCs effect on acute renal injury, regenerative and chronicity scores in the outer stripe of the outer medulla of rat kidney after cisplatin (n = 5 in each group for each time subgroup; mean ± SD)
| Control | Cispl. | Cispl.+ C.Medium | Cispl.+ ADMSC | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Necrotic tub. | ||||
| 4 | 0.0±0.0 | 12.6±2.1* | 8.4±1.7* | 3.9±0.3*° |
| 7 | 0.0±0.0 | 8.6±1.3*‡ | 8.3±1.5* | 4.6±0.4*° |
| 11 | 0.0±0.0 | 7.4±1.8*‡ | 7.5±2.2* | 2.6±0.2*°‡† |
| 30 | 0.0±0.0 | 4.7±0.1*‡†• | 2.4±0.3*‡†• | 1.0±0.6*°‡†• |
| Inflam. cells | ||||
| 4 | 0.0±0.0 | 8.8±1.3* | 8.4±1.6* | 1.8±0.2*° |
| 7 | 0.0±0.0) | 8.4±1.6* | 8.3±1.9* | 1.5±0.3*° |
| 11 | 0.0±0.0 | 8.5±1.1* | 8.1±1.5* | 0.0±0.0°‡† |
| 30 | 0.0±0.0 | 4.7±0.2*‡†• | 4.4±0.3*‡†• | 0.0±0.0°‡† |
| Reg. Tub | ||||
| 4 | 0.0±0.0 | 0.0±0.0 | 0.0±0.0 | 1.2±0.2*° |
| 7 | 0.0±0.0 | 0.0±0.0 | 0.0±0.0 | 2.7±0.2*°‡ |
| 11 | 0.0±0.0 | 0.0±0.0 | 0.0±0.0 | 7.5±1.6*°‡† |
| 30 | 0.0±0.0 | 1.4±0.2*‡†• | 1.6±0.3*‡†• | 7.4±2.9*°‡† |
| Mitosis | ||||
| 4 | 0.0±0.0 | 0.0±0.0 | 0.0±0.0 | 2.2±0.8*° |
| 7 | 0.0±0.0 | 0.0±0.0 | 0.0±0.0 | 3.7±0.2*°‡ |
| 11 | 0.0±0.0) | 1.7±0.2*‡† | 1.5±0.3*‡† | 4.5±0.3*°‡† |
| 30 | 0.0±0.0 | 1.7±0.2*‡† | 1.5±0.2*‡† | 4.9±0.9*°‡† |
| Solid Sheets | ||||
| 4 | 0.0±0.0 | 0.0±0.0 | 0.0±0.0 | 2.8±0.8*° |
| 7 | 0.0±0.0 | 0.0±0.0 | 0.0±0.0 | 4.8±0.6*°‡ |
| 11 | 0.0±0.0 | 0.0±0.0 | 0.0±0.0 | 5.7±0.5*°‡ |
| 30 | 0.0±0.0 | 1.3±0.2*‡†• | 1.4±0.4*‡†• | 6.9±2.8*°‡ |
| Int. Fibrosis | ||||
| 4 | 0.0±0.0 | 0.0±0.0 | 0.0±0.0 | 0.0±0.0 |
| 7 | 0.0±0.0) | 23.7±0.91*‡ | 23.1±1.4*‡ | 4.6±0.3*°‡ |
| 11 | 0.0±0.0 | 34.2±1.3*‡† | 32.8±2.3*‡† | 11.9±1.8*‡°† |
| 30 | 0.0±0.0) | 47.6±2.6*‡†• | 43.7±2.7*‡†• | 17.8±1.7*°‡†• |
| Atrophic Tub. | ||||
| 4 | 0.0±0.0 | 13.3±2.3* | 12.5±1.4* | 6.5±0.3*° |
| 7 | 0.0±0.0 | 12.7±1.2* | 12.5±1.3* | 4.7±0.4*°‡ |
| 11 | 0.0±0.0 | 12.4±0.8* | 12.3±0.6* | 3.8±1.8*°‡ |
| 30 | 0.0±0.0 | 4.4±0.2*‡†• | 4.6±0.2*‡†• | 2.8±0.6*°‡† |
Significant difference compared to corresponding * control, ° cisplatin groups
Significant difference compared to intragroup day4‡, day7†, day11• Kruskal-Wallis test at P≤0.05
Figure 8: