Literature DB >> 27397143

Relationship between maceration and wound healing on diabetic foot ulcers in Indonesia: a prospective study.

Haryanto Haryanto1,2, Defa Arisandi1, Suriadi Suriadi2, Imran Imran1,2, Kazuhiro Ogai3, Hiromi Sanada4, Mayumi Okuwa1, Junko Sugama1,3.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to clarify the relationship between maceration and wound healing. A prospective longitudinal design was used in this study. The wound condition determined the type of dressings used and the dressing change frequency. A total of 62 participants with diabetic foot ulcers (70 wounds) were divided into two groups: non-macerated (n = 52) and macerated wounds (n = 18). Each group was evaluated weekly using the Bates-Jensen Wound Assessment Tool, with follow-ups until week 4. The Mann-Whitney U test showed that the changes in the wound area in week 1 were faster in the non-macerated group than the macerated group (P = 0·02). The Pearson correlation analysis showed a moderate correlation between maceration and wound healing from enrolment until week 4 (P = 0·002). After week 4, the Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that the non-macerated wounds healed significantly faster than the macerated wounds (log-rank test = 19·378, P = 0·000). The Cox regression analysis confirmed that maceration was a significant and independent predictor of wound healing in this study (adjusted hazard ratio, 0·324; 95% CI, 0·131-0·799; P = 0·014). The results of this study demonstrated that there is a relationship between maceration and wound healing. Changes in the wound area can help predict the healing of wounds with maceration in clinical settings.
© 2016 Medicalhelplines.com Inc and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Diabetic foot ulcers; Wound healing; Wound maceration

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27397143      PMCID: PMC7949667          DOI: 10.1111/iwj.12638

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Wound J        ISSN: 1742-4801            Impact factor:   3.315


  19 in total

Review 1.  Wound microbiology and associated approaches to wound management.

Authors:  P G Bowler; B I Duerden; D G Armstrong
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 26.132

2.  Expression of matrix metalloproteinases and growth factors in diabetic foot wounds treated with a protease absorbent dressing.

Authors:  Ralf Lobmann; Carola Zemlin; Markus Motzkau; Kirsten Reschke; Hendrik Lehnert
Journal:  J Diabetes Complications       Date:  2006 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.852

3.  Wound fluids and the pathogenesis of chronic wounds.

Authors:  A B Wysocki
Journal:  J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 1.741

4.  Standards of medical care in diabetes--2010.

Authors: 
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 19.112

Review 5.  An overview of wound healing and exudate management.

Authors:  Geoff Thompson; Jackie Stephen-Haynes
Journal:  Br J Community Nurs       Date:  2007-12

6.  Challenges in protecting peri-wound skin.

Authors:  Helen Hollinworth
Journal:  Nurs Stand       Date:  2009 Oct 21-27

7.  Global estimates of diabetes prevalence for 2013 and projections for 2035.

Authors:  L Guariguata; D R Whiting; I Hambleton; J Beagley; U Linnenkamp; J E Shaw
Journal:  Diabetes Res Clin Pract       Date:  2013-12-01       Impact factor: 5.602

Review 8.  EWMA document: Antimicrobials and non-healing wounds. Evidence, controversies and suggestions.

Authors:  F Gottrup; J Apelqvist; T Bjarnsholt; T Bjansholt; R Cooper; Z Moore; E J G Peters; S Probst
Journal:  J Wound Care       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.072

9.  Consensus recommendations on advancing the standard of care for treating neuropathic foot ulcers in patients with diabetes.

Authors:  Robert J Snyder; Robert S Kirsner; Robert A Warriner; Lawrence A Lavery; Jason R Hanft; Peter Sheehan
Journal:  Ostomy Wound Manage       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 2.629

Review 10.  Factors affecting wound healing.

Authors:  S Guo; L A Dipietro
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2010-02-05       Impact factor: 6.116

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.