Literature DB >> 2739619

Preliminary validation of the opposing view method for quantitative gamma camera imaging.

J F Eary1, F L Appelbaum, L Durack, P Brown.   

Abstract

We perform gamma camera imaging to generate data for estimation of internal radiation dose in our radioimmunotherapy candidates. Because of the inability of single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) to account for patient attenuation variability without serious error, quantitative planar imaging was performed to estimate the radioactive content of normal organs. We undertook the following studies to further validate this method. A realistic fillable human phantom was used to determine the accuracy of I-131 filled organ estimation. A transmission scan of the unfilled phantom was produced with an I-131 filled flat flood source. Anterior and posterior planar images of the filled organs were acquired with region of interest determination of the activity in the organ. Correction by the attenuation factor and a camera calibration factor yielded the MBq in the organ. The procedure was also performed in a simple phantom. Three dogs were imaged and sacrificed to validate the technique in vivo. A high degree of accuracy in estimation of organ radioactive content was found to be present using the phantom and dog models. Use of this method requires further validation but provides a solid basis for estimation of internal radiation dosimetry in radioimmunotherapy planning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2739619     DOI: 10.1118/1.596347

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  12 in total

1.  Characterization of scatter and penetration using Monte Carlo simulation in 131I imaging.

Authors:  Y K Dewaraja; M Ljungberg; K F Koral
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 10.057

2.  Effects of shortened acquisition time on accuracy and precision of quantitative estimates of organ activity.

Authors:  Bin He; Eric C Frey
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Comparison of non-invasive approaches to red marrow dosimetry for radiolabelled monoclonal antibodies.

Authors:  M A Plaizier; J C Roos; G J Teule; E B van Dieren; W den Hollander; H J Haisma; R L DeJager; A van Lingen
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  1994-03

4.  An integrated approach to biodistribution radiation absorbed dose estimates.

Authors:  M E Noz; E L Kramer; G Q Maguire; S A McGee; J J Sanger
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  1993-02

Review 5.  Radio-immunotherapy dosimetry with special emphasis on SPECT quantification and extracorporeal immuno-adsorption.

Authors:  S E Strand; M Ljungberg; J Tennvall; K Norrgren; M Garkavij
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 2.602

6.  Image quantification for radiation dose calculations--limitations and uncertainties.

Authors:  J M Pereira; M G Stabin; F R A Lima; M I C C Guimarães; J W Forrester
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 1.316

7.  Evaluation of two internalizing carcinoembryonic antigen reporter genes for molecular imaging.

Authors:  Bhaswati Barat; Vania E Kenanova; Tove Olafsen; Anna M Wu
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.488

8.  Importance of intra-therapy single-photon emission tomographic imaging in calculating tumour dosimetry for a lymphoma patient.

Authors:  K F Koral; K R Zasadny; F M Swailem; S F Buchbinder; I R Francis; M S Kaminski; R L Wahl
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  1991

9.  Quantitative measurement of uptake of radiolabeled monoclonal antibody by means of planar data.

Authors:  Y Akiyama; N Yui; T Matsumoto; T A Iinuma; H Ikehira; H Fukuda; Y Tateno
Journal:  Ann Nucl Med       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 2.668

10.  A gamma camera count rate saturation correction method for whole-body planar imaging.

Authors:  Robert F Hobbs; Sébastien Baechler; Srinivasan Senthamizhchelvan; Andrew R Prideaux; Caroline E Esaias; Melvin Reinhardt; Eric C Frey; David M Loeb; George Sgouros
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-01-14       Impact factor: 3.609

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.