Literature DB >> 27395765

WFS1 in Optic Neuropathies: Mutation Findings in Nonsyndromic Optic Atrophy and Assessment of Clinical Severity.

Joanna Grenier1, Isabelle Meunier2, Vincent Daien3, Corinne Baudoin4, François Halloy5, Béatrice Bocquet6, Catherine Blanchet7, Cécile Delettre6, Etienne Esmenjaud8, Agathe Roubertie9, Guy Lenaers10, Christian P Hamel11.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To search for WFS1 mutations in patients with optic atrophy (OA) and assess visual impairment.
DESIGN: Retrospective molecular genetic and clinical study. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with OA followed at a national referral center specialized in genetic sensory diseases.
METHODS: Mutation screening in WFS1 was performed by Sanger sequencing. WFS1-positive patients were evaluated on visual acuity (VA) and retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness using time-domain (TD) or spectral-domain (SD) optical coherence tomography (OCT). Statistical analysis was performed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Mutation identification, VA values, and RNFL thickness in sectors.
RESULTS: Biallelic WFS1 mutations were found in 3 of 24 unrelated patients (15%) with autosomal recessive nonsyndromic optic atrophy (arNSOA) and in 8 patients with autosomal recessive Wolfram syndrome (arWS) associated with diabetes mellitus and OA. Heterozygous mutations were found in 4 of 20 unrelated patients (20%) with autosomal dominant OA. The 4 WFS1-mutated patients of this latter group with hearing loss were diagnosed with autosomal dominant Wolfram-like syndrome (adWLS). Most patients had VA decrease, with logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) values lower in arWS than in arNSOA (1.530 vs. 0.440; P = 0.026) or adWLS (0.240; P = 0.006) but not differing between arNSOA and adWLS (P = 0.879). All patients had decreased RNFL thickness that was worse in arWS than in arNSOA (SD OCT, 35.50 vs. 53.80 μm; P = 0.018) or adWLS (TD-OCT, 45.84 vs. 59.33 μm; P = 0.049). The greatest difference was found in the inferior bundle. Visual acuity was negatively correlated with RNFL thickness (r = -0.89; P = 0.003 in SD OCT and r = -0.75; P = 0.01 in TD-OCT).
CONCLUSIONS: WFS1 is a gene causing arNSOA. Patients with this condition had significantly less visual impairment than those with arWS. Thus systematic screening of WFS1 must be performed in isolated, sporadic, or familial optic atrophies.
Copyright © 2016 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27395765     DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.05.036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  17 in total

1.  Non-syndromic isolated dominant optic atrophy caused by the p.R468C mutation in the AFG3 like matrix AAA peptidase subunit 2 gene.

Authors:  Davide Colavito; Veronica Maritan; Agnese Suppiej; Elda Del Giudice; Monica Mazzarolo; Stefania Miotto; Sofia Farina; Maurizio Dalle Carbonare; Stefano Piermarocchi; Alberta Leon
Journal:  Biomed Rep       Date:  2017-09-22

2.  Clinical and molecular assessment of 13 Iranian families with Wolfram syndrome.

Authors:  Maryam Sobhani; Mohammad Amin Tabatabaiefar; Soudeh Ghafouri-Fard; Asadollah Rajab; Sarah Mozafarpour; Samaneh Nasrniya; Abdol-Mohammad Kajbafzadeh; Mohammad Reza Noori-Daloii
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2019-07-16       Impact factor: 3.633

3.  Optical Coherence Tomography: Imaging Mouse Retinal Ganglion Cells In Vivo.

Authors:  Jolanta Jagodzinska; Emmanuelle Sarzi; Mélanie Cavalier; Marie Seveno; Volker Baecker; Christian Hamel; Marie Péquignot; Cecile Delettre
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2017-09-22       Impact factor: 1.355

4.  Dominant ACO2 mutations are a frequent cause of isolated optic atrophy.

Authors:  Majida Charif; Naïg Gueguen; Marc Ferré; Zouhair Elkarhat; Salim Khiati; Morgane LeMao; Arnaud Chevrollier; Valerie Desquiret-Dumas; David Goudenège; Céline Bris; Selma Kane; Jennifer Alban; Stéphanie Chupin; Céline Wetterwald; Leonardo Caporali; Francesca Tagliavini; Chiara LaMorgia; Michele Carbonelli; Neringa Jurkute; Abdelhamid Barakat; Philippe Gohier; Christophe Verny; Magalie Barth; Vincent Procaccio; Dominique Bonneau; Xavier Zanlonghi; Isabelle Meunier; Nicole Weisschuh; Simone Schimpf-Linzenbold; Felix Tonagel; Ulrich Kellner; Patrick Yu-Wai-Man; Valerio Carelli; Bernd Wissinger; Patrizia Amati-Bonneau; Pascal Reynier; Guy Lenaers
Journal:  Brain Commun       Date:  2021-04-07

Review 5.  Wolfram syndrome: MAMs' connection?

Authors:  Benjamin Delprat; Tangui Maurice; Cécile Delettre
Journal:  Cell Death Dis       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 8.469

6.  Novel mutations and the ophthalmologic characters in Chinese patients with Wolfram Syndrome.

Authors:  Youjia Zhang; Lili Feng; Xiangmei Kong; Jihong Wu; Yuhong Chen; Guohong Tian
Journal:  Orphanet J Rare Dis       Date:  2019-08-07       Impact factor: 4.123

7.  An evaluation of genetic causes and environmental risks for bilateral optic atrophy.

Authors:  Andrew T Chen; Lauren Brady; Dennis E Bulman; Arun N E Sundaram; Amadeo R Rodriguez; Edward Margolin; John S Waye; Mark A Tarnopolsky
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-11-25       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Recurrent de novo WFS1 pathogenic variants in Chinese sporadic patients with nonsyndromic sensorineural hearing loss.

Authors:  Jing Guan; Hongyang Wang; Lan Lan; Yusen Wu; Guohui Chen; Cui Zhao; Dayong Wang; Qiuju Wang
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomic Med       Date:  2020-06-22       Impact factor: 2.183

9.  Retinal thickness as a marker of disease progression in longitudinal observation of patients with Wolfram syndrome.

Authors:  Agnieszka Zmyslowska; Wojciech Fendler; Arleta Waszczykowska; Anna Niwald; Maciej Borowiec; Piotr Jurowski; Wojciech Mlynarski
Journal:  Acta Diabetol       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 4.280

10.  Calcium mishandling in absence of primary mitochondrial dysfunction drives cellular pathology in Wolfram Syndrome.

Authors:  Chiara La Morgia; Alessandra Maresca; Giulia Amore; Laura Ludovica Gramegna; Michele Carbonelli; Emanuela Scimonelli; Alberto Danese; Simone Patergnani; Leonardo Caporali; Francesca Tagliavini; Valentina Del Dotto; Mariantonietta Capristo; Federico Sadun; Piero Barboni; Giacomo Savini; Stefania Evangelisti; Claudio Bianchini; Maria Lucia Valentino; Rocco Liguori; Caterina Tonon; Carlotta Giorgi; Paolo Pinton; Raffaele Lodi; Valerio Carelli
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-03-16       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.