Mitchell A Psotka1, Robyn von Maltzahn2, Milena Anatchkova3, Irene Agodoa4, Dina Chau4, Fady I Malik5, Donald L Patrick6, John A Spertus7, Ingela Wiklund2, John R Teerlink8. 1. School of Medicine, University of California San Francisco and Section of Cardiology, San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center, San Francisco, California. 2. Evidera, London, United Kingdom. 3. Evidera, Bethesda, Maryland. 4. Amgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, California. 5. Cytokinetics, Inc., South San Francisco, California. 6. Department of Health Services, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington. 7. Saint Luke's Mid America Heart Institute and Department of Biomedical and Health Informatics, University of Missouri, Kansas City, Missouri. 8. School of Medicine, University of California San Francisco and Section of Cardiology, San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center, San Francisco, California. Electronic address: john.teerlink@ucsf.edu.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The study sought to review the characteristics of existing patient-reported outcome (PRO) instruments used with chronic heart failure (HF) patients and evaluate their potential to support an approved U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) product label claim. BACKGROUND: PROs, including symptoms and their associated functional limitations, contribute substantially to HF patient morbidity. PRO measurements capture the patient perspective and can be systematically assessed with structured questionnaires, however rigorous recommendations have been set by the FDA regarding the acceptability of PRO measures as a basis for product label claims. METHODS: Extensive searches of databases and specialty guidelines identified PRO instruments used in patients with chronic HF. Information on critical properties recommended by the FDA guidance were systematically extracted and used to evaluate the selected PRO instruments. RESULTS: Nineteen PRO instruments used with chronic HF patients were identified. The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire and Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire were the most extensively evaluated and validated in studies of this population. However, judged by criteria listed in the FDA PRO guidance, no existing PRO measure met all of the criteria to support a product label claim in the United States. CONCLUSIONS: Currently available chronic HF PRO measures do not fulfill all the recommendations provided in the FDA PRO guidance and therefore may not support an FDA-approved product label claim. Future investigations are merited to develop a PRO measure for use in patients with chronic HF in accordance with the FDA guidance.
OBJECTIVES: The study sought to review the characteristics of existing patient-reported outcome (PRO) instruments used with chronic heart failure (HF) patients and evaluate their potential to support an approved U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) product label claim. BACKGROUND: PROs, including symptoms and their associated functional limitations, contribute substantially to HF patient morbidity. PRO measurements capture the patient perspective and can be systematically assessed with structured questionnaires, however rigorous recommendations have been set by the FDA regarding the acceptability of PRO measures as a basis for product label claims. METHODS: Extensive searches of databases and specialty guidelines identified PRO instruments used in patients with chronic HF. Information on critical properties recommended by the FDA guidance were systematically extracted and used to evaluate the selected PRO instruments. RESULTS: Nineteen PRO instruments used with chronic HF patients were identified. The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire and Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire were the most extensively evaluated and validated in studies of this population. However, judged by criteria listed in the FDA PRO guidance, no existing PRO measure met all of the criteria to support a product label claim in the United States. CONCLUSIONS: Currently available chronic HF PRO measures do not fulfill all the recommendations provided in the FDA PRO guidance and therefore may not support an FDA-approved product label claim. Future investigations are merited to develop a PRO measure for use in patients with chronic HF in accordance with the FDA guidance.
Authors: Frank Kramer; Javed Butler; Sanjiv J Shah; Christian Jung; Savina Nodari; Stephan Rosenkranz; Michele Senni; Luke Bamber; Stephan Cichos; Chrysanthi Dori; Toeresin Karakoyun; Gabriele Jenny Köhler; Kinjal Patel; Paolo Piraino; Thomas Viethen; Praneeth Chennuru; Ayse Paydar; Jason Sims; Richard Clark; Rob van Lummel; Alexandra Müller; Chad Gwaltney; Salko Smajlovic; Hans-Dirk Düngen; Wilfried Dinh Journal: Digit Biomark Date: 2020-06-30
Authors: Vittal Hejjaji; Yuanyuan Tang; Theresa Coles; Philip G Jones; Bryce B Reeve; Robert J Mentz; Erica S Spatz; Shannon M Dunlay; Brittany Caldwell; Anindita Saha; Michelle E Tarver; Andy Tran; Krishna K Patel; Debra Henke; Ileana L Piña; John A Spertus Journal: Circ Heart Fail Date: 2021-09-01 Impact factor: 10.447
Authors: Alvin Chandra; Eldrin F Lewis; Brian L Claggett; Akshay S Desai; Milton Packer; Michael R Zile; Karl Swedberg; Jean L Rouleau; Victor C Shi; Martin P Lefkowitz; Tzvetana Katova; John J V McMurray; Scott D Solomon Journal: JAMA Cardiol Date: 2018-06-01 Impact factor: 14.676
Authors: Peter H Brubaker; Teagan Avis; W Jack Rejeski; Shannon E Mihalko; Wesley J Tucker; Dalane W Kitzman Journal: J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev Date: 2020-11 Impact factor: 3.646
Authors: Peter Wohlfahrt; Susan L Zickmund; Stacey Slager; Larry A Allen; Jose Nativi Nicolau; Abdallah G Kfoury; G Michael Felker; Jorge Conte; Kelsey Flint; Adam D DeVore; Craig H Selzman; Rachel Hess; John A Spertus; Josef Stehlik Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2020-01-15 Impact factor: 5.501
Authors: Nadia Bouabdallaoui; Eileen O'Meara; Virginie Bernier; Michel Komajda; Karl Swedberg; Luigi Tavazzi; Jeffrey S Borer; Michael Bohm; Ian Ford; Jean-Claude Tardif Journal: ESC Heart Fail Date: 2019-10-08
Authors: Olga Moshkovich; Katy Benjamin; Katie Hall; Ryan Murphy; Robyn von Maltzahn; Boris Gorsh; Vanja Sikirica; Rajnish Saini; Dennis Sprecher Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2020-05-28 Impact factor: 4.147