Literature DB >> 27394384

Results of a near continuous glucose monitoring technology in surgical intensive care and trauma.

Eden Nohra1, Sara Buckman2, Kelly Bochicchio2, Jad Chamieh2, Stacey Reese2, Corinne Merrill2, Douglas Schuerer2, Grant V Bochicchio2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Near-continuous glucose monitoring is expected to increase time in range (TIR) of 80-120mg/dL and to avoid hypoglycemia without increasing workload. We investigated a near-continuous glucose monitor in surgical critically ill and trauma patients.
METHODS: Patients were enrolled at a surgical intensive care unit associated with a level 1 trauma center. Glucose measurements were compared to the gold standard Yellow Springs Instrument (YSI). The technology withdraws 0.13mL of blood every 15min from a central venous line, centrifuges the sample, and uses mid-infrared spectroscopy to measure glucose. We plotted a Clarke Error Grid, calculated Mean Absolute Relative Deviation (MARD) to analyze trend accuracy, and we present a Bland Altman plot of device versus standard glucose measurements.
RESULTS: 24 patients were enrolled. One patient was withdrawn due to poor blood return from central venous line. A total of 347 glucose measurements from 23 patients were compared to the gold standard. 94.8% of the data points were in zone A of the Clarke Error Grid and 5.2% in zone B. The MARD was 8.02%. The majority of data points achieved the benchmark for accuracy. The remaining 5.2% are clinically benign. The MARD was below 10%. The Bland Altman plot shows good agreement between the device and reference glucose measurements. There were no device related adverse events.
CONCLUSION: Our data suggests that near continuous monitoring via infrared spectroscopy is safe and accurate for use in critically ill surgical and trauma patients. A large scale multi-center study is underway to confirm these findings.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Accuracy; Blood glucose meter; Continuous glucose monitoring; Glucose control; Near-infrared spectroscopy; Surgical intensive care

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27394384     DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2016.07.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials        ISSN: 1551-7144            Impact factor:   2.226


  5 in total

1.  Consensus Statement on Inpatient Use of Continuous Glucose Monitoring.

Authors:  Amisha Wallia; Guillermo E Umpierrez; Robert J Rushakoff; David C Klonoff; Daniel J Rubin; Sherita Hill Golden; Curtiss B Cook; Bithika Thompson
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2017-04-21

2.  Glucose Management Technologies for the Critically Ill.

Authors:  Pedro D Salinas; Carlos E Mendez
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2019-01-13

3.  Continuous Glucose Monitors and Automated Insulin Dosing Systems in the Hospital Consensus Guideline.

Authors:  Rodolfo J Galindo; Guillermo E Umpierrez; Robert J Rushakoff; Ananda Basu; Suzanne Lohnes; James H Nichols; Elias K Spanakis; Juan Espinoza; Nadine E Palermo; Dessa Garnett Awadjie; Leigh Bak; Bruce Buckingham; Curtiss B Cook; Guido Freckmann; Lutz Heinemann; Roman Hovorka; Nestoras Mathioudakis; Tonya Newman; David N O'Neal; Michaela Rickert; David B Sacks; Jane Jeffrie Seley; Amisha Wallia; Trisha Shang; Jennifer Y Zhang; Julia Han; David C Klonoff
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2020-09-28

Review 4.  The Clinical Benefits and Accuracy of Continuous Glucose Monitoring Systems in Critically Ill Patients-A Systematic Scoping Review.

Authors:  Sigrid C J van Steen; Saskia Rijkenberg; Jacqueline Limpens; Peter H J van der Voort; Jeroen Hermanides; J Hans DeVries
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2017-01-14       Impact factor: 3.576

Review 5.  Diabetes Technology Update: Use of Insulin Pumps and Continuous Glucose Monitoring in the Hospital.

Authors:  Guillermo E Umpierrez; David C Klonoff
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2018-06-23       Impact factor: 19.112

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.