Literature DB >> 2739376

Neural drive to muscles in stuttering.

A Smith1.   

Abstract

EMG recordings were made from muscles of the jaw, lip, and neck during speech of 10 stutterers and 10 nonstutterers. One-second records of disfluent behaviors of stutterers and of fluent speech of the normal speakers were analyzed by computing cross correlations between all possible muscle pairs and spectra for each muscle channel. The cross correlation analysis indicated that for both the disfluent behavior of stutterers and the fluent speech of nonstutterers, jaw muscles (including antagonistic pairs), lip muscles, and neck muscles tend to be coactivated. Thus, no dramatic differences in muscle activation patterns were revealed in the correlational analysis. In contrast, spectral analysis revealed differences between muscle activity during disfluent behavior and fluent speech. During disfluencies the muscles of 6 of the stutterers showed large, rhythmic oscillations in the frequency range of 5 to 12 Hz. Large oscillations were not observed in this frequency range in the muscle activity of normal speakers. The oscillations in muscle activity during disfluencies generally occurred at the same frequency in the various muscle systems studied. These results suggest that diverse muscles are subject to common oscillatory synaptic drive during disfluent behaviors and that this drive is disruptive to speech production. A reasonable speculation is that the disruptive oscillatory drive is produced by tremorogenic mechanisms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2739376     DOI: 10.1044/jshr.3202.252

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Hear Res        ISSN: 0022-4685


  7 in total

1.  Neurophysiologic markers of primary motor cortex for laryngeal muscles and premotor cortex in caudal opercular part of inferior frontal gyrus investigated in motor speech disorder: a navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) study.

Authors:  Maja Rogić Vidaković; Ana Jerković; Tomislav Jurić; Igor Vujović; Joško Šoda; Nikola Erceg; Andreja Bubić; Marina Zmajević Schönwald; Pantelis Lioumis; Dragan Gabelica; Zoran Đogaš
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2016-04-29

2.  Evidence That Bimanual Motor Timing Performance Is Not a Significant Factor in Developmental Stuttering.

Authors:  Allison I Hilger; Howard Zelaznik; Anne Smith
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 2.297

Review 3.  How Stuttering Develops: The Multifactorial Dynamic Pathways Theory.

Authors:  Anne Smith; Christine Weber
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  Spectral analyses of activity of laryngeal and orofacial muscles in stutterers.

Authors:  A Smith; E Luschei; M Denny; J Wood; M Hirano; S Badylak
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 10.154

5.  Oral electromyography activation patterns for speech are similar in preschoolers who do and do not stutter.

Authors:  Bridget Walsh; Anne Smith
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2013-07-09       Impact factor: 2.297

6.  The Effects of Syntactic Complexity and Sentence Length on the Speech Motor Control of School-Age Children Who Stutter.

Authors:  Evan R Usler; Bridget Walsh
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 2.297

7.  A Lag in Speech Motor Coordination During Sentence Production Is Associated With Stuttering Persistence in Young Children.

Authors:  Evan Usler; Anne Smith; Christine Weber
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-01-01       Impact factor: 2.297

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.