Literature DB >> 27393421

Facing mixed emotions: Analytic and holistic perception of facial emotion expressions engages separate brain networks.

Emilie Meaux1, Patrik Vuilleumier2.   

Abstract

The ability to decode facial emotions is of primary importance for human social interactions; yet, it is still debated how we analyze faces to determine their expression. Here we compared the processing of emotional face expressions through holistic integration and/or local analysis of visual features, and determined which brain systems mediate these distinct processes. Behavioral, physiological, and brain responses to happy and angry faces were assessed by presenting congruent global configurations of expressions (e.g., happy top+happy bottom), incongruent composite configurations (e.g., angry top+happy bottom), and isolated features (e.g. happy top only). Top and bottom parts were always from the same individual. Twenty-six healthy volunteers were scanned using fMRI while they classified the expression in either the top or the bottom face part but ignored information in the other non-target part. Results indicate that the recognition of happy and anger expressions is neither strictly holistic nor analytic Both routes were involved, but with a different role for analytic and holistic information depending on the emotion type, and different weights of local features between happy and anger expressions. Dissociable neural pathways were engaged depending on emotional face configurations. In particular, regions within the face processing network differed in their sensitivity to holistic expression information, which predominantly activated fusiform, inferior occipital areas and amygdala when internal features were congruent (i.e. template matching), whereas more local analysis of independent features preferentially engaged STS and prefrontal areas (IFG/OFC) in the context of full face configurations, but early visual areas and pulvinar when seen in isolated parts. Collectively, these findings suggest that facial emotion recognition recruits separate, but interactive dorsal and ventral routes within the face processing networks, whose engagement may be shaped by reciprocal interactions and modulated by task demands.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Analytic; Emotions; Faces; Holistic; fMRI

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27393421     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.07.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  10 in total

1.  Implicit evidence on the dissociation of identity and emotion recognition.

Authors:  Marcello Passarelli; Michele Masini; Carlo Chiorri; Alessandro Nurcis; Roberta Daini; Fabrizio Bracco
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2021-10-07

2.  Face masks affect perception of happy faces in deaf people.

Authors:  Maria Bianca Amadeo; Andrea Escelsior; Mario Amore; Gianluca Serafini; Beatriz Pereira da Silva; Monica Gori
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-07-20       Impact factor: 4.996

3.  Confidence of emotion expression recognition recruits brain regions outside the face perception network.

Authors:  Indrit Bègue; Maarten Vaessen; Jeremy Hofmeister; Marice Pereira; Sophie Schwartz; Patrik Vuilleumier
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2019-01-04       Impact factor: 3.436

4.  Association between Scale-Free Brain Dynamics and Behavioral Performance: Functional MRI Study in Resting State and Face Processing Task.

Authors:  Masato Kasagi; Zirui Huang; Kosuke Narita; Hitoshi Shitara; Tomokazu Motegi; Yusuke Suzuki; Kazuyuki Fujihara; Sean Tanabe; Hirotaka Kosaka; Koichi Ujita; Masato Fukuda; Georg Northoff
Journal:  Behav Neurol       Date:  2017-12-21       Impact factor: 3.342

5.  Emotional learning promotes perceptual predictions by remodeling stimulus representation in visual cortex.

Authors:  E Meaux; V Sterpenich; P Vuilleumier
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Altered functional connectivity density and couplings in postpartum depression with and without anxiety.

Authors:  Bochao Cheng; Yushan Zhou; Veronica P Y Kwok; Yuanyuan Li; Song Wang; Yajun Zhao; Yajing Meng; Wei Deng; Jiaojian Wang
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2022-08-01       Impact factor: 4.235

7.  COVID-19 masks: A barrier to facial and vocal information.

Authors:  Nadia Aguillon-Hernandez; Renaud Jusiak; Marianne Latinus; Claire Wardak
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-09-23       Impact factor: 5.152

8.  Exogenous attention intensifies perceived emotion expressions.

Authors:  Maruti V Mishra; Narayanan Srinivasan
Journal:  Neurosci Conscious       Date:  2017-12-04

9.  Selective eye fixations on diagnostic face regions of dynamic emotional expressions: KDEF-dyn database.

Authors:  Manuel G Calvo; Andrés Fernández-Martín; Aida Gutiérrez-García; Daniel Lundqvist
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-11-19       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Subclinical paranoid beliefs and enhanced neural response during processing of unattractive faces.

Authors:  Stephan Furger; Antje Stahnke; Francilia Zengaffinen; Andrea Federspiel; Yosuke Morishima; Martina Papmeyer; Roland Wiest; Thomas Dierks; Werner Strik
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2020-04-25       Impact factor: 4.881

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.