BACKGROUND: Long-term outcomes after ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation are sparsely described. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to describe long-term prognosis after VT ablation in patients with no structural heart disease (no SHD), ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM), and nonischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM). METHODS: Consecutive patients (N = 695: no SHD, 98; ICM, 358; NICM, 239) ablated for sustained VT were followed for a median of 6 years. Acute procedural parameters (complete success [noninducibility of any VT]) and outcomes after multiple procedures were reported. RESULTS: Compared with patients with no SHD or NICM, patients with ICM were the oldest, were more likely to be men, lowest left ventricular ejection fraction, highest drug failures, VT storms, and number of inducible VTs. Complete procedure success was highest in patients with no SHD than in patients with ICM and those with NICM (79%, 56%, 60%, respectively; P < .001). At 6 years, ventricular arrhythmia (VA)-free survival was highest in patients with no SHD (77%) than in patients with ICM (54%) and those with NICM (38%) (P < .001), and overall survival was lowest in patients with ICM (48%), followed by patients with NICM (74%) and patients with no SHD (100%) (P < .001). Age, left ventricular ejection fraction, presence of SHD, acute procedural success (noninducibility of any VT), major complications, need for nonradiofrequency ablation modalities, and VA recurrence were independently associated with all-cause mortality. CONCLUSION: Long-term follow-up after VT ablation shows excellent prognosis in the absence of SHD, highest VA recurrence, and transplantation in patients with NICM and highest mortality in patients with ICM. The extremely low mortality for those without SHD suggests that VT in this population is rarely an initial presentation of a myopathic process.
BACKGROUND: Long-term outcomes after ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation are sparsely described. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to describe long-term prognosis after VT ablation in patients with no structural heart disease (no SHD), ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM), and nonischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM). METHODS: Consecutive patients (N = 695: no SHD, 98; ICM, 358; NICM, 239) ablated for sustained VT were followed for a median of 6 years. Acute procedural parameters (complete success [noninducibility of any VT]) and outcomes after multiple procedures were reported. RESULTS: Compared with patients with no SHD or NICM, patients with ICM were the oldest, were more likely to be men, lowest left ventricular ejection fraction, highest drug failures, VT storms, and number of inducible VTs. Complete procedure success was highest in patients with no SHD than in patients with ICM and those with NICM (79%, 56%, 60%, respectively; P < .001). At 6 years, ventricular arrhythmia (VA)-free survival was highest in patients with no SHD (77%) than in patients with ICM (54%) and those with NICM (38%) (P < .001), and overall survival was lowest in patients with ICM (48%), followed by patients with NICM (74%) and patients with no SHD (100%) (P < .001). Age, left ventricular ejection fraction, presence of SHD, acute procedural success (noninducibility of any VT), major complications, need for nonradiofrequency ablation modalities, and VA recurrence were independently associated with all-cause mortality. CONCLUSION: Long-term follow-up after VT ablation shows excellent prognosis in the absence of SHD, highest VA recurrence, and transplantation in patients with NICM and highest mortality in patients with ICM. The extremely low mortality for those without SHD suggests that VT in this population is rarely an initial presentation of a myopathic process.
Authors: Edmond M Cronin; Frank M Bogun; Philippe Maury; Petr Peichl; Minglong Chen; Narayanan Namboodiri; Luis Aguinaga; Luiz Roberto Leite; Sana M Al-Khatib; Elad Anter; Antonio Berruezo; David J Callans; Mina K Chung; Phillip Cuculich; Andre d'Avila; Barbara J Deal; Paolo Della Bella; Thomas Deneke; Timm-Michael Dickfeld; Claudio Hadid; Haris M Haqqani; G Neal Kay; Rakesh Latchamsetty; Francis Marchlinski; John M Miller; Akihiko Nogami; Akash R Patel; Rajeev Kumar Pathak; Luis C Saenz Morales; Pasquale Santangeli; John L Sapp; Andrea Sarkozy; Kyoko Soejima; William G Stevenson; Usha B Tedrow; Wendy S Tzou; Niraj Varma; Katja Zeppenfeld Journal: J Interv Card Electrophysiol Date: 2020-10 Impact factor: 1.900
Authors: Marmar Vaseghi; Tiffany Y Hu; Roderick Tung; Pasquale Vergara; David S Frankel; Luigi Di Biase; Usha B Tedrow; Jeffrey A Gornbein; Ricky Yu; Nilesh Mathuria; Shiro Nakahara; Wendy S Tzou; William H Sauer; J David Burkhardt; Venkatakrishna N Tholakanahalli; Timm-Michael Dickfeld; J Peter Weiss; T Jared Bunch; Madhu Reddy; David J Callans; Dhanunjaya R Lakkireddy; Andrea Natale; Francis E Marchlinski; William G Stevenson; Paolo Della Bella; Kalyanam Shivkumar Journal: JACC Clin Electrophysiol Date: 2018-07-25
Authors: Edmond M Cronin; Frank M Bogun; Philippe Maury; Petr Peichl; Minglong Chen; Narayanan Namboodiri; Luis Aguinaga; Luiz Roberto Leite; Sana M Al-Khatib; Elad Anter; Antonio Berruezo; David J Callans; Mina K Chung; Phillip Cuculich; Andre d'Avila; Barbara J Deal; Paolo Della Bella; Thomas Deneke; Timm-Michael Dickfeld; Claudio Hadid; Haris M Haqqani; G Neal Kay; Rakesh Latchamsetty; Francis Marchlinski; John M Miller; Akihiko Nogami; Akash R Patel; Rajeev Kumar Pathak; Luis C Sáenz Morales; Pasquale Santangeli; John L Sapp; Andrea Sarkozy; Kyoko Soejima; William G Stevenson; Usha B Tedrow; Wendy S Tzou; Niraj Varma; Katja Zeppenfeld Journal: Europace Date: 2019-08-01 Impact factor: 5.214