Literature DB >> 27392896

Role of Intracranial Pressure Monitoring in Management of Patients with Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: Results of a Large Level I Trauma Center in Southern Iran.

Hosseinali Khalili1, Nazanin Sadraei2, Amin Niakan3, Fariborz Ghaffarpasand4, Amin Sadraei2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the role of intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring in management of patients with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) admitted to a large level I trauma center in Southern Iran.
METHODS: This was a cohort study performed during a 2-year period in a level I trauma center in Southern Iran including all adult patients (>16 years) with severe TBI (Glasgow Coma Scale [GCS] score, 3-8) who underwent ICP monitoring through ventriculostomy. The management was based on the recorded ICP values with threshold of 20 mm Hg. Decompressive craniectomy was performed in patients with intractable intracranial hypertension (persistent ICP ≥25 mm Hg). In unresponsive patients, barbiturate coma was induced. Patients were followed for 6 months and Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended was recorded. The determinants of favorable and unfavorable outcome were also determined.
RESULTS: Overall, we included 248 patients with mean age of 34.6 ± 16.6 years, among whom there were 216 men (87.1%) and 32 women (12.9%). Eighty-five patients (34.2%) had favorable and 163 (65.8%) unfavorable outcomes. Those with favorable outcome had significantly lower age (P = 0.004), higher GCS score on admission (P < 0.001), lower Rotterdam score (P = 0.035), fewer episodes of intracranial hypertension (P < 0.001), and lower maximum recorded ICP (P = 0.041). These factors remained statistically significant after elimination of confounders by multivariate logistic regression model.
CONCLUSIONS: Age, GCS score on admission, Rotterdam score, intracranial hypertension, and maximum recorded ICP are important determinants of outcome in patients with severe TBI. ICP monitoring assisted us in targeted therapy and management of patients with severe TBI.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cerebral perfusion pressure; Intracranial pressure monitoring; Prognosis; Traumatic brain injury; Ventriculostomy

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27392896     DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2016.06.122

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World Neurosurg        ISSN: 1878-8750            Impact factor:   2.104


  6 in total

1.  Current Concepts and Advancements in Management of Traumatic Brain Injury; A Glimpse at the Recently Published Evidence.

Authors:  Fariborz Ghaffarpasand; Maryam Dehghankhalili
Journal:  Bull Emerg Trauma       Date:  2017-04

2.  Tranexamic Acid; A Glittering Player in the Field of Trauma.

Authors:  Fariborz Ghaffarpasand; Hamid Reza Abbasi; Shahram Bolandparvaz; Shahram Paydar; Maryam Dehghankhalili
Journal:  Bull Emerg Trauma       Date:  2020-04

3.  Outcome Determinants of Decompressive Craniectomy in Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury; A Single Center Experience from Southern Iran.

Authors:  Hosseinali Khalili; Amin Niakan; Fariborz Ghaffarpasand; Arash Kiani; Reza Behjat
Journal:  Bull Emerg Trauma       Date:  2017-07

Review 4.  Optimal Timing of External Ventricular Drainage after Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Charlene Y C Chau; Saniya Mediratta; Mikel A McKie; Barbara Gregson; Selma Tulu; Ari Ercole; Davi J F Solla; Wellingson S Paiva; Peter J Hutchinson; Angelos G Kolias
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-06-25       Impact factor: 4.241

5.  Enoxaparin in the treatment of severe traumatic brain injury: A randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Humain Baharvahdat; Babak Ganjeifar; Hamid Etemadrezaie; Mohammad Farajirad; Samira Zabihyan; Ashkan Mowla
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2019-01-25

6.  Postoperative complications influencing the long-term outcome of head-injured patients after decompressive craniectomy.

Authors:  Guangfu Di; Yuhai Zhang; Hua Liu; Xiaochun Jiang; Yong Liu; Kun Yang; Jiu Chen; Hongyi Liu
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 2.708

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.