BACKGROUND: To validate the activPAL3 algorithm for predicting metabolic equivalents (TAMETs) and classifying MVPA in 5- to 12-year-old children. METHODS: Fifty-seven children (9.2 ± 2.3y, 49.1% boys) completed 14 activities including sedentary behaviors (SB), light (LPA) and moderate-to-vigorous physical activities (MVPA). Indirect calorimetry (IC) was used as the criterion measure. Analyses included equivalence testing, Bland-Altman procedures and area under the receiver operating curve (ROC-AUC). RESULTS: At the group level, TAMETs were significantly equivalent to IC for handheld e-game, writing/coloring, and standing class activity (P < .05). Overall, TAMETs were overestimated for SB (7.9 ± 6.7%) and LPA (1.9 ± 20.2%) and underestimated for MVPA (27.7 ± 26.6%); however, classification accuracy of MVPA was good (ROC-AUC = 0.86). Limits of agreement were wide for all activities, indicating large individual error (SB: -27.6% to 44.7%; LPA: -47.1% to 51.0%; MVPA: -88.8% to 33.9%). CONCLUSIONS: TAMETs were accurate for some SB and standing, but were overestimated for overall SB and LPA, and underestimated for MVPA. Accuracy for classifying MVPA was, however, acceptable.
BACKGROUND: To validate the activPAL3 algorithm for predicting metabolic equivalents (TAMETs) and classifying MVPA in 5- to 12-year-old children. METHODS: Fifty-seven children (9.2 ± 2.3y, 49.1% boys) completed 14 activities including sedentary behaviors (SB), light (LPA) and moderate-to-vigorous physical activities (MVPA). Indirect calorimetry (IC) was used as the criterion measure. Analyses included equivalence testing, Bland-Altman procedures and area under the receiver operating curve (ROC-AUC). RESULTS: At the group level, TAMETs were significantly equivalent to IC for handheld e-game, writing/coloring, and standing class activity (P < .05). Overall, TAMETs were overestimated for SB (7.9 ± 6.7%) and LPA (1.9 ± 20.2%) and underestimated for MVPA (27.7 ± 26.6%); however, classification accuracy of MVPA was good (ROC-AUC = 0.86). Limits of agreement were wide for all activities, indicating large individual error (SB: -27.6% to 44.7%; LPA: -47.1% to 51.0%; MVPA: -88.8% to 33.9%). CONCLUSIONS: TAMETs were accurate for some SB and standing, but were overestimated for overall SB and LPA, and underestimated for MVPA. Accuracy for classifying MVPA was, however, acceptable.
Authors: Marijka J Batterham; Christel Van Loo; Karen E Charlton; Dylan P Cliff; Anthony D Okely Journal: Br J Nutr Date: 2016-02-16 Impact factor: 3.718
Authors: Robert J Kuczmarski; Cynthia L Ogden; Shumei S Guo; Laurence M Grummer-Strawn; Katherine M Flegal; Zuguo Mei; Rong Wei; Lester R Curtin; Alex F Roche; Clifford L Johnson Journal: Vital Health Stat 11 Date: 2002-05
Authors: Christiana M T van Loo; Anthony D Okely; Marijka J Batterham; Trina Hinkley; Ulf Ekelund; Søren Brage; John J Reilly; Gregory E Peoples; Rachel A Jones; Xanne Janssen; Dylan P Cliff Journal: J Sci Med Sport Date: 2016-05-06 Impact factor: 4.319
Authors: Xanne Janssen; Dylan P Cliff; John J Reilly; Trina Hinkley; Rachel A Jones; Marijka Batterham; Ulf Ekelund; Søren Brage; Anthony D Okely Journal: J Sci Med Sport Date: 2013-11-11 Impact factor: 4.319
Authors: Nancy F Butte; Kathleen B Watson; Kate Ridley; Issa F Zakeri; Robert G McMurray; Karin A Pfeiffer; Scott E Crouter; Stephen D Herrmann; David R Bassett; Alexander Long; Zekarias Berhane; Stewart G Trost; Barbara E Ainsworth; David Berrigan; Janet E Fulton Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2018-02 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: Christiana Maria Theodora VAN Loo; Anthony D Okely; Marijka J Batterham; Trina Hinkley; Ulf Ekelund; Søren Brage; John J Reilly; Stewart G Trost; Rachel A Jones; Xanne Janssen; Dylan P Cliff Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2018-03 Impact factor: 5.411