Literature DB >> 27392271

Case series of ventriculopleural shunts in adults: a single-center experience.

Claudia Craven1, Hasan Asif1, Amna Farrukh1, Flavia Somavilla1, Ahmed K Toma1, Laurence Watkins1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE The peritoneal cavity is widely used as the destination of choice for cerebrospinal fluid shunts. Various alternative sites have been used, particularly in the presence of certain contraindications. The pleural cavity has been used; however, a paucity of evidence details ventriculopleural (VPL) shunt survival, complication, and revision rates in adults. The aim of this study was to present a single center's experience with VPL shunts, identifying complication, revision, and survival rates. METHODS A single-center, retrospective case series analysis was conducted for VPL shunt insertions and revisions over a period of 5 years. Demographic as well as clinical data were collected. Ventriculopleural shunt survival was assessed using Kaplan-Meier curves and the log rank (Cox-Mantel) test. RESULTS Twenty-two VPL shunts were inserted in 19 patients. Median survival of the VPL shunts was 14 months. Pathological indication for the VPL shunt did not significantly affect survival. A total of 10 complications was observed: 2 infections, 2 cases of overdrainage, 2 obstructions, 1 distal catheter retraction, 2 symptomatic pleural effusions, and 1 asymptomatic pleural effusion. CONCLUSIONS Ventriculopleural shunting is a safe and viable second-line procedure for cases in which ventriculoperitoneal shunts are unsuitable. While VPL shunts have a high revision rate, their complication rate is comparable to that of VP shunts. Ventriculopleural shunt survival can be improved by careful patient selection and the implementation of a combination of valves with antisiphon devices.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CSF = cerebrospinal fluid; IAP = intraabdominal pressure; IIH = idiopathic intracranial hypertension; VA = ventriculoatrial; VP = ventriculoperitoneal; VPL = ventriculopleural; cerebrospinal fluid; hydrocephalus; idiopathic intracranial hypertension; ventriculoatrial; ventriculoperitoneal; ventriculopleural

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27392271     DOI: 10.3171/2016.4.JNS16641

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg        ISSN: 0022-3085            Impact factor:   5.115


  5 in total

1.  Ventriculoatrial shunt as a feasible regimen for certain patients of hydrocephalus: clinical features and surgical management.

Authors:  Huanjiang Niu; Haijian Wu; Weijia Luo; Kun Wang; Linfang Zhao; Yirong Wang
Journal:  Acta Neurol Belg       Date:  2019-07-04       Impact factor: 2.396

Review 2.  The significance of intra-abdominal pressure in neurosurgery and neurological diseases: a narrative review and a conceptual proposal.

Authors:  Paul R A M Depauw; Rob J M Groen; Johannes Van Loon; Wilco C Peul; Manu L N G Malbrain; Jan J De Waele
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2019-03-25       Impact factor: 2.216

3.  Shunt-Bronchial Fistula with Coughing Up and Swallowing of Cerebrospinal Fluid: Rare Complication of Ventriculopleural Shunt.

Authors:  Gennadiy A Katsevman; Raymond Harron; Sanjay Bhatia
Journal:  World Neurosurg X       Date:  2019-11-01

4.  Case Series of Ventriculoatrial Shunt placement in Hybrid Room: Reassessment of Ventriculoatrial Shunt.

Authors:  Young Ha Kim; Sang Weon Lee; Dong Hyun Kim; Chi Hyung Lee; Chang Hyeun Kim; Soon Ki Sung; Dong Wuk Son; Geun Sung Song
Journal:  Korean J Neurotrauma       Date:  2020-10-28

Review 5.  Thrombosis associated with ventriculoatrial shunts.

Authors:  Dengjun Wu; Zhengyan Guan; Limin Xiao; Donghai Li
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2021-10-13       Impact factor: 3.042

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.