Literature DB >> 27392268

Intermittent bilateral deep brain stimulation of the nucleus accumbens shell reduces intravenous methamphetamine intake and seeking in Wistar rats.

Vinita Batra1, Thanh Lam N Tran2, Jessica Caputo2, Glenn F Guerin2, Nicholas E Goeders2, Jessica Wilden1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE There is increasing interest in neuromodulation for addiction. Methamphetamine abuse is a global health epidemic with no proven treatment. The objective of this study was to examine the effects of intermittent nucleus accumbens shell (AcbSh) deep brain stimulation (DBS) on operant methamphetamine intake and on methamphetamine seeking when stimulation is delivered in an environment different from that of drug use. METHODS Eighteen rats were implanted with intravenous (IV) catheters and bilateral AcbSh electrodes and subsequently underwent daily sessions in 2-lever (active/methamphetamine and inactive/no reward) operant chambers to establish IV methamphetamine self-administration. After stable responding was achieved, 3 hours of DBS or sham treatment was administered (sham: 0 µA, n = 8; active: 200 µA, n = 10) in a separate nondrug environment prior to the daily operant sessions for 5 consecutive days. Immediately following each DBS/sham treatment, rats were placed in the operant chambers to examine the effects of remote stimulation on methamphetamine intake. After the 5 days of therapy were finished, rats reestablished a posttreatment baseline, followed by extinction training, abstinence, and 1 day of relapse testing to assess methamphetamine-seeking behavior. RESULTS There was a decrease in total methamphetamine intake in rats receiving active DBS versus sham on Days 1 (42%) and 2 (44%). Methamphetamine administration returned to baseline levels following the cessation of DBS therapy. Compared with baseline drug responding, methamphetamine seeking was reduced (57%) in the DBS group but not in the sham group. CONCLUSIONS It is feasible to deliver noncontinuous DBS outside of the drug use environment with a resultant decrease in IV methamphetamine intake and seeking. The AcbSh is a neuroanatomical substrate for psychostimulant reinforcement and may be a target for intermittent neuromodulatory therapies that could be administered during brief periods of sobriety.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acb = nucleus accumbens; AcbSh = nucleus accumbens shell; D1R = D1-receptor; DBS = beep brain stimulation; FR1 = fixed ratio of one; GABA = γ-aminobutyric acid; HFS = high-frequency stimulation; IV = intravenous; LFS = low-frequency stimulation; MSN = medium spiny neuron; PFC = prefrontal cortex; PSR = Pavlovian spontaneous recovery; TMS = transcranial magnetic stimulation; VTA = ventral tegmental area; deep brain stimulation; intravenous self-administration; methamphetamine; neuromodulation; relapse; substance addiction

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27392268     DOI: 10.3171/2016.4.JNS152524

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg        ISSN: 0022-3085            Impact factor:   5.115


  7 in total

Review 1.  Deep brain stimulation for the treatment of drug addiction.

Authors:  Tony R Wang; Shayan Moosa; Robert F Dallapiazza; W Jeffrey Elias; Wendy J Lynch
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 4.047

2.  Deep brain stimulation of the nucleus accumbens shell attenuates cocaine withdrawal but increases cocaine self-administration, cocaine-induced locomotor activity, and GluR1/GluA1 in the central nucleus of the amygdala in male cocaine-dependent rats.

Authors:  Marsida Kallupi; Jenni Kononoff; Philippe A Melas; Johanna S Qvist; Giordano de Guglielmo; Eric R Kandel; Olivier George
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2021-11-03       Impact factor: 8.955

3.  Effect of electrical stimulation of central nucleus of the amygdala on morphine conditioned place preference in male rats.

Authors:  Zahra Jokara; Saeed Khatamsaz; HojjatAllah Alaei; Mehrdad Shariati
Journal:  Iran J Basic Med Sci       Date:  2022-05       Impact factor: 2.532

4.  Deep Brain Stimulation for Addictive Disorders-Where Are We Now?

Authors:  Jason Yuen; Abbas Z Kouzani; Michael Berk; Susannah J Tye; Aaron E Rusheen; Charles D Blaha; Kevin E Bennet; Kendall H Lee; Hojin Shin; Jee Hyun Kim; Yoonbae Oh
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2022-04-11       Impact factor: 6.088

5.  Response to Deep Brain Stimulation in Three Brain Targets with Implications in Mental Disorders: A PET Study in Rats.

Authors:  Marta Casquero-Veiga; Ravit Hadar; Javier Pascau; Christine Winter; Manuel Desco; María Luisa Soto-Montenegro
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-12-29       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  High-Frequency Deep Brain Stimulation of the Substantia Nigra Pars Reticulata Facilitates Extinction and Prevents Reinstatement of Methamphetamine-Induced Conditioned Place Preference.

Authors:  Libo Zhang; Shiqiu Meng; Wenjun Chen; Yun Chen; Enze Huang; Guipeng Zhang; Yisen Liang; Zengbo Ding; Yanxue Xue; Yun Chen; Jie Shi; Yu Shi
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 5.810

Review 7.  Biomarkers and neuromodulation techniques in substance use disorders.

Authors:  Bettina Habelt; Mahnaz Arvaneh; Nadine Bernhardt; Ivan Minev
Journal:  Bioelectron Med       Date:  2020-02-17
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.