| Literature DB >> 27392011 |
Wei Wei1, Xiaoming Li1,2, Sayward Harrison1,2, Junfeng Zhao2, Guoxiang Zhao2.
Abstract
Children affected by HIV/AIDS have unique psychosocial needs that often go unaddressed in traditional treatment approaches. They are more likely than unaffected peers to encounter stigma, including overt discriminatory behaviors, as well as stereotyped attitudes. In addition, HIV-affected children are at risk for experiencing negative affect, including sadness and depression. Previous studies have identified a link between HIV stigma and the subsequent emotional status of children affected by HIV/AIDS. However, limited data are available regarding protective psychological factors that can mitigate the effects of HIV stigma and thus promote resiliency for this vulnerable population. Utilizing data from 790 children aged 6-17 years affected by parental HIV in rural central China this study aims to examine the association between HIV stigma, including both enacted and perceived stigma, and emotional status among HIV-affected children, as well as to evaluate the mediating effects of emotional regulation on the relationship between HIV stigma and emotional status. In addition, the moderating role of age is tested. Multiple regression was conducted to test the mediation model. We found that the experience of HIV stigma had a direct positive effect on negative emotions among children affected by HIV. Emotional regulation offers a level of protection, as it mediated the impact of HIV stigma on negative emotions. Moreover, age was found to moderate the relationship between perceived stigma and negative emotions. A significant interaction between perceived stigma and age suggested that negative emotions increase with age among those who perceived a higher level of stigmatization. Results suggest that children affected by HIV may benefit from interventions designed to enhance their capacity to regulate emotions and that health professionals should be aware of the link between stigma and negative emotion in childhood and adolescence and use the knowledge to inform their treatments with this population.Entities:
Keywords: HIV stigma; HIV-affected children; age; emotional regulation; emotional status; rural China
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27392011 PMCID: PMC4991225 DOI: 10.1080/09540121.2016.1178974
Source DB: PubMed Journal: AIDS Care ISSN: 0954-0121
Means, standard deviations, Cronbach’s alpha and correlations (N = 790).
| Variable | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Cronbach’salpha | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Enacted stigma | 1.78 (0.76) | ------- | .80 | ||||
| 2. Perceived stigma | 2.77 (0.61) | .53** | ------- | .93 | |||
| 3. Positive emotions | 2.73 (0.56) | −.03 | −.03 | ------- | .84 | ||
| 4. Negative emotions | 2.82 (0.68) | .43** | .26** | .05 | ------- | .81 | |
| 5. Emotional regulation | 2.73 (0.56) | −.18** | −.22** | .27** | −.27** | ------- | .80 |
| 6. Age | 10.67 (1.79) | −.17** | −. 26** | −.04 | −.11** | .05 |
*p < .05.
**p < .01.
Figure 1. Final path model showing the indirect effect of both enacted and perceived stigma on negative emotions via emotional regulation. * p < .05, ** p < .01.
Mediation analyses and indirect effects and 95% confidence intervals with 1000 bootstrap resamples using the Sobel test (N = 790).
| DV = Negative emotions IVs | Boot SE | Indirect effect | Boot LLCI | Boot ULCI | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Enacted stigma | .26 | 11.2** | ||||
| −.25 | −6.4** | 0.01 | 0.05** | 0.02 | 0.08 | |
| Perceived stigma | .36 | 6.1** | ||||
| −.27 | −6.5** | 0.01 | 0.03** | 0.01 | 0.05 |
aIndirect effect on the relationship between negative emotions and enacted stigma.
bIndirect effect on the relationship between negative emotions and perceived stigma.
*p < .05.
**p < .01.
Hierarchical regression analysis results for the moderating effect of perceived stigma and age on negative emotions (N = 790).
| Variables | Δ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Negative emotions | 0.08** | |||
| Perceived stigma | .26 | 7.5** | 0.07** | |
| Age | −.02 | −1.0 | 0.002 | |
| Perceived stigma × Age | .04 | 2.4* | 0.01* |
*p < .05.
**p < .01
Figure 2. Interaction of perceived stigma and age on negative emotions scores. Note: Low age = 1 SD below mean; high age = 1 SD above mean.