Literature DB >> 27391932

Upper and lower conjunctival fornix depth in healthy white caucasian eyes: a method of objective assessment.

G Jutley1, D Carpenter2, S Hau1, D Booth1, H A Jasim1, E Tay1, C Daniel1, V Saw1,3.   

Abstract

PurposeEvaluating anti-scarring therapies require objective assessment of scarring, and knowledge of normal fornix anatomy. Measurement of conjunctival scarring has focused on inferior fornix shortening, although the superior fornix is often overlooked. There are data on normal fornix depth (FD) in South Asians, but there are no studies investigating normal conjunctival FD in white Caucasians. We designed a fornix depth measurer (FDM) for objective measurement of upper and lower conjunctival FD. The purpose of this study was to evaluate intra- and inter-observer variability, and to establish a reference for normal conjunctival FD in an ethnically white Caucasian population.Patients and methodsProspective cross-sectional study evaluating conjunctival FD in 252 clinically normal white Caucasian participants aged 20-80. Paired observers evaluated inter- and intra-observer variability. Data was analyzed using Bland-Altman plots and analysis of variance.ResultsFor white Caucasian subjects, mean upper and lower conjunctival fornix depths were 15.6 mm (95% confidence interval (CI), 12.5-18.8) and 10.9 mm (95% CI, 8.0-13.7), respectively. Females have smaller FDs (upper FD 15.3 mm±1.6 females, 16.2 mm±1.4 males, P<0.001; lower FD 10.6 mm±1.3 females, 11.3 mm±1.4 males, P<0.001). There was a progressive decline in FD with age (upper fornix depth 16.3 mm±1.2 at age 20-29, and 15.0 mm±1.8 at age 80+ (P=0.04)). There was 94-100% intra-observer and inter-observer agreement for upper and lower fornix measurements.ConclusionsUsing a slightly different custom-designed FDM, central conjunctival fornix depth in white Caucasian eyes appears to be similar to data previously reported in South Asian eyes. Fornix depth measurements were repeatable and reproducible.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27391932      PMCID: PMC5129856          DOI: 10.1038/eye.2016.128

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eye (Lond)        ISSN: 0950-222X            Impact factor:   3.775


  12 in total

1.  Measurement of fornix depth and area: a novel method of determining the severity of fornix shortening.

Authors:  T Kawakita; M Kawashima; D Murat; K Tsubota; J Shimazaki
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2008-07-11       Impact factor: 3.775

2.  Profibrotic phenotype of conjunctival fibroblasts from mucous membrane pemphigoid.

Authors:  Valerie P J Saw; Enno Schmidt; Ifeoma Offiah; Grazyna Galatowicz; Detlef Zillikens; John K G Dart; Virginia L Calder; Julie T Daniels
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2010-12-23       Impact factor: 4.307

3.  Cicatricial pemphigoid.

Authors:  C S Foster
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  1986

4.  Ocular and oral grading of mucous membrane pemphigoid.

Authors:  Graham M B Reeves; Marianne Lloyd; Bijaya P Rajlawat; Gillian L Barker; E Anne Field; Stephen B Kaye
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-11-13       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  A new method for measuring progression in patients with ocular cicatricial pemphigoid.

Authors:  J James Rowsey; Yolanda Macias-Rodriguez; Chris Cukrowski
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-02

6.  The giant fornix syndrome: an unrecognized cause of chronic, relapsing, grossly purulent conjunctivitis.

Authors:  Geoffrey E Rose
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 12.079

7.  Foreshortening of the inferior conjunctival fornix associated with chronic glaucoma medications.

Authors:  I R Schwab; J V Linberg; V M Gioia; W H Benson; G M Chao
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 12.079

8.  Immunosuppressive therapy for ocular mucous membrane pemphigoid strategies and outcomes.

Authors:  Valerie P J Saw; John K G Dart; Saaeha Rauz; Andrew Ramsay; Catey Bunce; Wen Xing; Patricia G Maddison; Melanie Phillips
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2007-07-26       Impact factor: 12.079

9.  Validation of a fornix depth measurer: a putative tool for the assessment of progressive cicatrising conjunctivitis.

Authors:  Geraint P Williams; Valerie P J Saw; Tariq Saeed; Simon T Evans; Paul Cottrell; S John Curnow; Peter Nightingale; Saaeha Rauz
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-10-17       Impact factor: 4.638

10.  Defining the limits of normal conjunctival fornix anatomy in a healthy South Asian population.

Authors:  Imran J Khan; Abdul-Jabbar Ghauri; James Hodson; Matthew R Edmunds; Paul Cottrell; Simon Evans; Geraint P Williams; Saaeha Rauz
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2013-12-04       Impact factor: 12.079

View more
  5 in total

1.  Response to: 'An alternative method for upper and lower conjunctival fornix measurement'.

Authors:  G Jutley; V P J Saw
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2017-06-16       Impact factor: 3.775

2.  An alternative method for upper and lower conjunctival fornix measurement.

Authors:  R Peden; L Hughes; M Wright
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2017-06-16       Impact factor: 3.775

Review 3.  Molecular mechanisms and treatments for ocular symblephara.

Authors:  Aditi Swarup; Christopher N Ta; Albert Y Wu
Journal:  Surv Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-04-29       Impact factor: 6.048

Review 4.  A review of scoring systems for ocular involvement in chronic cutaneous bullous diseases.

Authors:  Brendon W H Lee; Jeremy C K Tan; Melissa Radjenovic; Minas T Coroneo; Dedee F Murrell
Journal:  Orphanet J Rare Dis       Date:  2018-05-22       Impact factor: 4.123

Review 5.  Ocular Mucous Membrane Pemphigoid: Current State of Pathophysiology, Diagnostics and Treatment.

Authors:  Panagiotis Georgoudis; Francesco Sabatino; Nora Szentmary; Sotiria Palioura; Eszter Fodor; Samer Hamada; Hendrik P N Scholl; Zisis Gatzioufas
Journal:  Ophthalmol Ther       Date:  2019-01-29
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.