Literature DB >> 27391802

Downstream consequences of melanoma screening in a community practice setting: First results.

Martin A Weinstock1,2, Laura K Ferris3, Melissa I Saul4, Alan C Geller5, Patricia M Risica6, Julia A Siegel7, Francis X Solano8, John M Kirkwood9.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Population-based screening for the early detection of melanoma holds great promise for reducing melanoma mortality, but evidence is needed to determine whether benefits outweigh risks. Skin surgeries and dermatology visits after screening were assessed to indicate potential physical, psychological, and financial consequences.
METHODS: Targeted primary care providers (PCPs) at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center were trained to detect early melanoma using the INFORMED (INternet course FOR Melanoma Early Detection) program. The authors analyzed aggregated administrative data describing 3 groups of patients aged ≥35 years who had received an annual physical examination by PCPs: group A1 included patients of PCPs from the group with the highest percentage of INFORMED-trained providers, group A2 included patients of PCPs from the group with a lower percentage of INFORMED-trained providers, and group B included patients of PCPs without INFORMED training.
RESULTS: INFORMED-trained PCPs screened 1572 of 16,472 patients in groups A1 or A2 and none of the 56,261 patients in group B. In group A1, there was a 79% increase (95% confidence interval, 15%-138%) in melanoma diagnoses noted; no increase was observed for the other groups, and no substantial increase in skin surgeries or dermatology visits occurred in any group.
CONCLUSIONS: A large-scale melanoma screening using the INFORMED program was conducted in Pennsylvania. To the best of the authors' knowledge, the current study is the first analysis of downstream results and the findings indicate increased melanoma diagnoses but little impact on skin surgeries or dermatology visits. This result provides some reassurance that such efforts can be conducted without major adverse consequences, at least as measured by these parameters, and therefore should be considered for more widespread use. Cancer 2016;122:3152-6.
© 2016 American Cancer Society. © 2016 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  dermatologic surgical procedures; mass screening; melanoma; mortality; office visits

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27391802      PMCID: PMC5286549          DOI: 10.1002/cncr.30177

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  6 in total

1.  Developing an interactive web-based learning program on skin cancer: the learning experiences of clinical educators.

Authors:  Waqas R Shaikh; Alan Geller; Gwen Alexander; Maryam M Asgari; Gunther J Chanange; Stephen Dusza; Melody J Eide; Suzanne W Fletcher; Jacqueline M Goulart; Allan C Halpern; Shoshana Landow; Ashfaq A Marghoob; Elizabeth A Quigley; Martin A Weinstock
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 2.037

2.  Effects on skills and practice from a web-based skin cancer course for primary care providers.

Authors:  Melody J Eide; Maryam M Asgari; Suzanne W Fletcher; Alan C Geller; Allan C Halpern; Waqas R Shaikh; Lingling Li; Gwen L Alexander; Andrea Altschuler; Stephen W Dusza; Ashfaq A Marghoob; Elizabeth A Quigley; Martin A Weinstock
Journal:  J Am Board Fam Med       Date:  2013 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.657

3.  Does skin cancer screening save lives?: an observational study comparing trends in melanoma mortality in regions with and without screening.

Authors:  Alexander Katalinic; Annika Waldmann; Martin A Weinstock; Alan C Geller; Nora Eisemann; Ruediger Greinert; Beate Volkmer; Eckhard Breitbart
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2012-04-19       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Clinical whole-body skin examination reduces the incidence of thick melanomas.

Authors:  Joanne F Aitken; Mark Elwood; Peter D Baade; Philippa Youl; Dallas English
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2010-01-15       Impact factor: 7.396

5.  Screening program reduced melanoma mortality at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, 1984 to 1996.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Schneider; Dan H Moore; Mortimer L Mendelsohn
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2008-02-20       Impact factor: 11.527

6.  Melanoma early detection with thorough skin self-examination: the "Check It Out" randomized trial.

Authors:  Martin A Weinstock; Patricia M Risica; Rosemarie A Martin; William Rakowski; Catherine Dubé; Marianne Berwick; Michael G Goldstein; Suddhasatta Acharyya; Thomas Lasater
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 5.043

  6 in total
  14 in total

1.  A Randomized Trial on the Efficacy of Mastery Learning for Primary Care Provider Melanoma Opportunistic Screening Skills and Practice.

Authors:  June K Robinson; Namita Jain; Ashfaq A Marghoob; William McGaghie; Michael MacLean; Pedram Gerami; Brittney Hultgren; Rob Turrisi; Kimberly Mallett; Gary J Martin
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Are Primary Care Residents Trained to Perform Skin Cancer Examinations?

Authors:  Richard A Shellenberger; Karine Tawagi; Sweta Kakaraparthi; Jeremy Albright; Mohammed Nabhan; Alan C Geller
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Primary Care-Based Skin Cancer Screening in a Veterans Affairs Health Care System.

Authors:  Susan M Swetter; Julia Chang; Amanda R Shaub; Martin A Weinstock; Eleanor T Lewis; Steven M Asch
Journal:  JAMA Dermatol       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 10.282

Review 4.  Skin Cancer Education Interventions for Primary Care Providers: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Ashley E Brown; Maleka Najmi; Taylor Duke; Daniel A Grabell; Misha V Koshelev; Kelly C Nelson
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 6.473

Review 5.  Melanoma Early Detection: Big Data, Bigger Picture.

Authors:  Tracy Petrie; Ravikant Samatham; Alexander M Witkowski; Andre Esteva; Sancy A Leachman
Journal:  J Invest Dermatol       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 8.551

6.  Total Body Skin Examination Practices: A Survey Study Amongst Dermatologists at High-Risk Skin Cancer Clinics.

Authors:  Shirin Bajaj; Zachary J Wolner; Stephen W Dusza; Ralph P Braun; Ashfaq A Marghoob; Jennifer DeFazio
Journal:  Dermatol Pract Concept       Date:  2019-04-30

7.  A Large Skin Cancer Screening Quality Initiative: Description and First-Year Outcomes.

Authors:  Laura K Ferris; Melissa I Saul; Yan Lin; Fei Ding; Martin A Weinstock; Alan C Geller; Jian-Min Yuan; Erica Neuren; Spandana Maddukuri; Francis X Solano; John M Kirkwood
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 31.777

8.  Conflicts and contradictions in current skin cancer screening guidelines.

Authors:  K Y Wojcik; L A Escobedo; K A Miller; M Hawkins; O Ahadiat; S Higgins; A Wysong; Myles Cockburn
Journal:  Curr Dermatol Rep       Date:  2017-11-04

9.  Rare nodular malignant melanoma of the heel in the Caribbean: A case report.

Authors:  Wayne A Warner; Vandana Devika Sookdeo; Srikanth Umakanthan; Kevin Sarran; Lemuel Pran; Maurice Fortuné; Wesley Greaves; Sharda Narinesingh; Dave Harnanan; Ravi Maharaj
Journal:  Int J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2016-11-27

10.  Psychosocial consequences of skin cancer screening.

Authors:  Patricia Markham Risica; Natalie H Matthews; Laura Dionne; Jennifer Mello; Laura K Ferris; Melissa Saul; Alan C Geller; Francis Solano; John M Kirkwood; Martin A Weinstock
Journal:  Prev Med Rep       Date:  2018-04-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.