| Literature DB >> 27390727 |
Sang Hoon Lee1, Seung Hee Oh1, In Guk Hwang2, Hyun Young Kim3, Koan Sik Woo3, Shun Hee Woo4, Hong Sig Kim4, Junsoo Lee1, Heon Sang Jeong1.
Abstract
This study was performed to evaluate and compare the antioxidant substance content and antioxidant activities of white (Superior) and colored (Hongyoung, Jayoung, Jasim, Seohong, and Jaseo) potatoes. The potatoes were extracted with 80% ethanol and were evaluated for the total polyphenol, flavonoid, and anthocyanin contents and for 1,1-diphenyl- 2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH)/2,2'-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) diammonium salt (ABTS) radical scavenging activity, reducing power, and ferrous metal ion chelating effect. The total polyphenol, flavonoid, and anthocyanin contents of Hongyoung and Jayoung were higher than white and other colored potatoes. All colored potato extracts, except for Jaseo and Seohong, showed higher ABTS radical scavenging activities than the general white potato extract. Hongyoung and Jayoung had the highest ABTS and DPPH radical scavenging activities. Optical density values for the reducing power of Jayoung and Jaseo at concentration of 2 mg/mL were 0.148 and 0.090, respectively. All colored potato extracts had lower ferrous metal ion chelating effect than the white potato. A significant (P<0.05) positive correlation was observed between total polyphenol content and total flavonoid content (r=0.919), anthocyanin content (r=0.992), and ABTS radical scavenging activity (r=0.897). Based on these results, this research may be useful in developing the Hongyoung and Jayoung cultivars with high antioxidant activities.Entities:
Keywords: anthocyanin; antioxidant activities; colored potato; flavonoid; polyphenol
Year: 2016 PMID: 27390727 PMCID: PMC4935237 DOI: 10.3746/pnf.2016.21.2.110
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Prev Nutr Food Sci ISSN: 2287-1098
Hunter Lab values of white and colored potato varieties
| Superior | 82.7±0.2a | −0.5±0.0f | 17.5±0.1a | 0f |
| Hongyoung | 69.9±0.4e | 8.9±0.3a | 4.8±0.0e | 20.53±0.16b |
| Jayoung | 61.0±0.2f | 7.9±0.0b | −3.2±0.1f | 31.35±0.29a |
| Jasim | 73.7±0.1d | 3.1±0.1c | 8.2±0.2d | 13.64±0.25c |
| Jaseo | 76.9±0.0c | 1.1±0.0d | 12.1±0.2c | 8.30±0.19d |
| Seohong | 81.5±0.1b | 0.7±0.0e | 14.4±0.5b | 3.70±0.67e |
Values with different letters (a–f) with a column are significantly different (P<0.05) by Duncan’s multiple range test.
Fig. 1Total polyphenol content of ethanolic extracts on the white and colored potato varieties. Means on bars with different letters (a–d) are significantly different (P<0.05) by Duncan’s multiple range test. GAE: gallic acid equivalent.
Fig. 2Total flavonoid contents of ethanolic extracts on the white and colored potato varieties. Means on bars with different letters (a–e) are significantly different (P<0.05) by Duncan’s multiple range test. CE: (+)-catechin equivalent.
Fig. 3Total anthocyanin content of ethanolic extracts on the white and colored potato varieties. Means on bars with different letters (a–e) are significantly different (P<0.05) by Duncan’s multiple range test.
Fig. 4ABTS radical scavenging activity of ethanolic extracts on the white and colored potato varieties. Means on bars with different letters (a–e) are significantly different (P<0.05) by Duncan’ s multiple range test. AAE: L-ascorbic acid equivalent.
Fig. 5DPPH radical scavenging activity of ethanolic extracts on the white and colored potato varieties. Means on bars with different letters (a–f) are significantly different (P<0.05) by Duncan’s multiple range test.
Fig. 6Reducing power of ethanolic extracts on the white and colored potato varieties. Means on bars with different letters (a–d) are significantly different (P<0.05) by Duncan’s multiple range test.
Fig. 7Iron chelating effect of ethanolic extracts on the white and colored potato varieties. Means on bars with different letters (a–d) are significantly different (P<0.05) by Duncan’s multiple range test.
Correlation coefficients among functional substances, antioxidant activity, and colors of colored potato varieties
| TPP | TF | ABTS | DPPH | RP | FC | AC | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TPP | 1.000 | 0.919 | 0.897 | −0.494 | 0.400 | 0.357 | 0.992 | −0.807 | 0.962 | −0.815 |
| TF | 1.000 | 0.910 | −0.774 | 0.554 | 0.619 | 0.944 | −0.875 | 0.914 | −0.860 | |
| ABTS | 1.000 | −0.627 | 0.171 | 0.597 | 0.923 | −0.784 | 0.941 | −0.774 | ||
| DPPH | 1.000 | −0.620 | −0.933 | −0.537 | 0.578 | −0.482 | 0.514 | |||
| RP | 1.000 | 0.344 | 0.386 | −0.403 | 0.253 | −0.382 | ||||
| FC | 1.000 | 0.396 | −0.392 | 0.361 | −0.315 | |||||
| AC | 1.000 | −0.869 | 0.985 | −0.875 | ||||||
| 1.000 | −0.888 | 0.995 | ||||||||
| a* | 1.000 | −0.899 | ||||||||
| b* | 1.000 |
TPP, total polyphenol contents; TF, total flavonoid contents; ABTS, 2,2′-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) diammonium salt (ABTS) radical scavenging activity; DPPH, 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) radical scavenging activity; RP, reducing power; FC, Fe iron chelating effect; AC, anthocyanin content.
P<0.05 and
P<0.01.