Juri Eom1, Min-Hyung Rhee2, Laurentius Jongsoon Kim3. 1. Department of Physical Therapy, Graduate School, Catholic University of Pusan, Republic of Korea. 2. Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Pusan National University Hospital, Republic of Korea. 3. Department of Physical Therapy, College of Health Sciences, Catholic University of Pusan, Republic of Korea.
Abstract
[Purpose] This study assessed the activity of the abdominal muscles according to the angle of the knee joints during sit-to-stand. [Subjects and Methods] Thirty healthy adult males participated in this study. Subjects initiated sit-to-stand at knee joint angles of 60°, 90°, or 120°. An electromyography system was used to measure the maximum voluntary isometric contraction of the rectus abdominis, external oblique, and internal oblique and transverse abdominis muscles. [Results] Percent contraction differed significantly among the three knee joint angles, most notably for the internal oblique and transverse abdominis muscles. [Conclusion] Wider knee joint angles more effectively activate the abdominal muscles, especially those in the deep abdomen, than do narrower angles.
[Purpose] This study assessed the activity of the abdominal muscles according to the angle of the knee joints during sit-to-stand. [Subjects and Methods] Thirty healthy adult males participated in this study. Subjects initiated sit-to-stand at knee joint angles of 60°, 90°, or 120°. An electromyography system was used to measure the maximum voluntary isometric contraction of the rectus abdominis, external oblique, and internal oblique and transverse abdominis muscles. [Results] Percent contraction differed significantly among the three knee joint angles, most notably for the internal oblique and transverse abdominis muscles. [Conclusion] Wider knee joint angles more effectively activate the abdominal muscles, especially those in the deep abdomen, than do narrower angles.
Sit-to-stand (STS) is an essential motion in daily life1), often performed when shifting body position, walking, or climbing
stairs. STS requires a larger range of motion in the hip joints and knee joints than does
walking or stair climbing2, 3). Millington et al.4) and Schenkman et al.5) divided STS into four stages. In the first stage, which is the
flexion moment phase, body weight shifts as the trunk bends while standing up. In the second
stage, the buttocks detach from the chair, and the flexion of the ankle joint toward the top
of the foot becomes maximal. In the third stage, unfolding occurs as the trunk, knee joints,
and hip joints extend to achieve an upright standing position. The fourth stage is the
stabilization phase. This classification has been widely used in motion analyses in
kinematic and motor mechanic studies1, 6).As determined via a literature review, biomechanical analyses of STS have focused mainly on
the ankle joints and lower limb muscles. Previous studies examined the activity of the lower
limb muscles during STS7), the activation
of the vastus medialis oblique and vastus lateralis muscles in asymptomatic subjects during
STS8), the effect of knee flexion angle
on STS in individuals with hemiparesis9),
the impact of foot location on STS in stroke patients10), and the coordinating relationship between the lower limb muscles
in response to diverse external stimuli11). However, STS requires not only use of the lower limbs but also of
the trunk12). Moreover, activation of the
abdominal muscles in the trunk is essential for maintaining diverse body positions in daily
life. Appropriate activation of the abdominal muscles is therefore very important for their
endurance13). Although a previous study
showed that STS was closely related to both the activity of the abdominal muscles and body
stability14), this finding has yet to be
explored in detail. Hence, the present study examined the activity of the abdominal muscles
during STS as a function of knee joint angle.
SUBJECTS AND METHODS
Thirty healthy adult males in City B who did not have lower back pain in the six months
preceding the study were selected as the study subjects. The average age of the study
population was 28.23 ± 4.02 years, the average height was 174.5 ± 4.4 cm, and the average
weight was 71.23 ± 10.04 kg. The research process was explained to the subjects, and a
written consent to participate was obtained from them. The study was approved by the
Bioethics Committee at Busan University (E-2015013).To determine the effects of knee joint angle on the activity of the abdominal muscles
during STS, the subjects began the STS motion from a sitting position in which the knee
joint angle was 60°, 90°, or 120°, according to the tester’s instructions. A surface
electromyogram system (Telemyo 2400; Noraxon, Scottsdale, AZ, USA) was used to measure the
activity of the abdominal muscles. To measure the activity of the rectus abdominis (RA)
muscle, the electrode was attached 2 cm to the left of and 2 cm below the navel along the
fibers of the RA. To measure the activity of external oblique (EO) muscle, the electrode was
attached at the midpoint between the anterior superior iliac spine (ASIS) and the costal
bone along the fibers of the OA. To measure the activity of the internal oblique (IO) and
transverse abdominis (TrA) muscles (collectively referred to as “IO & TrA”), the
electrode was attached 2 cm inside and 2 cm below the ASIS along the fibers of these
muscles15). Muscle activity was measured
in bandwidths of 20−450 Hz at a frequency of 1,000 Hz. The measured values were processed as
the root mean square. To express the collected electromyogram signals as the maximum
voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC), MVIC was performed for 10 seconds for each muscle;
this time was determined in manual muscle tests16). The muscle signals measured in the first 4 seconds after removing
the initial and the final 3 seconds were used in the data analysis. To minimize the muscle
fatigue that can occur from consecutive measurements, the participants rested for 10 minutes
after each exercise. The collected data were analyzed by using SPSS for Windows (ver. 20.0)
and one-way analysis of variance. The Scheffe test was used for the ex-post analysis, and
the significance level was set at 0.05.
RESULTS
The abdominal muscle activity at knee joint angles of 60°, 90°, and 120° is presented in
Table 1. There was a significant difference in percent MVIC among the three angles.
The ex-post analysis also showed a significant difference in percent MVIC for the IO &
TrA muscles.
Table 1.
Activity of the abdominal muscles according to the knee joint angle
% MVIC
RA
EO
IO & TrA
60°*
3.83 ± 0.50a
4.37 ± 0.48a
8.87 ± 0.70b
90°*
4.61 ± 0.54a
5.48 ± 0.60a
10.05 ± 0.79b
120°*
6.59 ± 0.75a
7.71 ± 0.82a
12.76 ± 1.06b
Units are expressed as percentages. *Statistically significant (p<0.05) The
different superscripts indicate significant differences. MVIC: maximum voluntary
isometric contraction, RA: rectus abdominis, EO: external oblique, IO: interior
oblique, TrA: transverse abdominis
Units are expressed as percentages. *Statistically significant (p<0.05) The
different superscripts indicate significant differences. MVIC: maximum voluntary
isometric contraction, RA: rectus abdominis, EO: external oblique, IO: interior
oblique, TrA: transverse abdominis
DISCUSSION
Moving from a relatively stable position (sitting down) to a relatively unstable position
(standing while maintaining balance), as done during STS, shifts the body’s center of
gravity17). To accurately shift the
center of gravity during STS, the placement of the feet in relationship to the base of the
body, as well as the surrounding tissues, is important. Harmonious contraction of the trunk
muscles, in addition to those in the lower limbs, is also required18). To stabilize the trunk and to control posture, the
abdominal muscles should simultaneously contract12,
19, 20). Hence, this study determined the relationship between the activity
of the abdominal muscles during STS and the angle of the knee joints.Our results indicate that the abdominal muscles, especially those in the deep abdomen,
become more active when the knee joint angle is increased during STS. According to Hodge and
Richardson21), the TrA is the first
muscle in the hip joint to contract regardless of the direction of the force, and as
reported by Cresswell22), it is the first
muscle activated in response to physical disturbance, such as trembling of the body. Park
and Lee23) determined the activity of the
trunk muscles in subjects leaning against a wall in an abdominal hollowing exercise, which
is similar to the STS movement. The activities of the EO and TrA were found to be 2.35 and
2.7 times higher, respectively, than the activity of the RA on average, indicating that the
deep abdominal muscles were the most active. In the present study, the activities of the EO
and TrA were 1.16 and 2.13 times higher, respectively, than the activity of the RA on
average. These findings suggest that the deeper the abdominal muscle is, the stronger its
activity will be during STS, and are consistent with previous results.Previous studies showed that increasing the knee joint angle while in the sitting position
increased the backward incline of the pelvis24) and that the muscles that control the trunk became more active when
the pelvis was inclined backward during STS25). In other words, increases in the knee joint angle increase the
activity of the abdominal muscles that control the trunk. This is consistent with the
results of this study, which showed that abdominal muscle activity differed according to the
knee joint angle during STS. A particularly strong activation was observed in the deep
abdominal muscles. Hence, performance of the STS movement can effectively train the deep
abdominal muscles in a clinical setting.A limitation of this study is that the research subjects were healthy people. Moreover,
this study analyzed the functioning of only contracted abdominal muscles. Future studies
will investigate the effects of knee joint angle on muscle activity in patients with limited
movement owing to neurologic or musculoskeletal defects. In addition to quantitative
analysis of the contraction of the abdominal muscles, it will be necessary to conduct a
dynamic analysis of factors other than knee joint angle, such as muscle contraction speed
and recruitment features, to account for body structure.