Literature DB >> 27390381

A Primary Care Panel Size of 2500 Is neither Accurate nor Reasonable.

Melanie Raffoul1, Miranda Moore2, Doug Kamerow2, Andrew Bazemore2.   

Abstract

Primary care panel sizes are an important component of primary care practices. Determining the appropriate panel size has implications for patient access, physician workload, and care comprehensiveness and will have an impact on quality of care. An often quoted standard panel size is 2500. However, this number seems to arise in the literature anecdotally, without a basis in research. Subsequently, multiple studies observed that a panel size of 2500 is not feasible because of time constraints and results in incomplete preventive care and health care screening services. In this article we review the origins of a panel size of 2500, review the subsequent work examining this number and effectively debunking it as a feasible panel size, and discuss the importance of primary care physicians setting an appropriate panel size. © Copyright 2016 by the American Board of Family Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Comprehensive Health Care; Primary Care Physicians; Primary Health Care; Research; Workload

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27390381     DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2016.04.150317

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Board Fam Med        ISSN: 1557-2625            Impact factor:   2.657


  17 in total

1.  The American Board of Internal Medicine Maintenance of Certification Examination and State Medical Board Disciplinary Actions: a Population Cohort Study.

Authors:  Furman S McDonald; Lauren M Duhigg; Gerald K Arnold; Ruth M Hafer; Rebecca S Lipner
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2018-03-07       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Cancer care coordination: opportunities for healthcare delivery research.

Authors:  Sallie J Weaver; Paul B Jacobsen
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2018-05-23       Impact factor: 3.046

3.  The impact of e-visits on patient access to primary care.

Authors:  Xiang Zhong; Peter Hoonakker; Philip A Bain; Albert J Musa; Jingshan Li
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  2017-05-18

4.  American College of Physicians Ethical Guidance for Electronic Patient-Physician Communication: Aligning Expectations.

Authors:  Wei Wei Lee; Lois Snyder Sulmasy
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2020-06-22       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Workforce Configurations to Provide High-Quality, Comprehensive Primary Care: a Mixed-Method Exploration of Staffing for Four Types of Primary Care Practices.

Authors:  David Meyers; Lisa LeRoy; Michael Bailit; Judith Schaefer; Edward Wagner; Chunliu Zhan
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2018-07-03       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Revitalizing Primary Care, Part 1: Root Causes of Primary Care's Problems.

Authors:  Thomas Bodenheimer
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2022 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.707

7.  Perceived quality of care among households ever enrolled in a community-based health insurance scheme in two districts of northeast Ethiopia: a community-based, cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Mohammed Hussien; Muluken Azage; Negalign Berhanu Bayou
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-10-17       Impact factor: 3.006

8.  Moderate mental illness as a predictor of chronic disease prevention and screening.

Authors:  Ginetta Salvalaggio; Christopher Meaney; Rahim Moineddin; Eva Grunfeld; Donna Manca
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2017-06-17       Impact factor: 2.497

9.  Physician Experience with Direct-To-Consumer Genetic Testing in Kaiser Permanente.

Authors:  M Cabell Jonas; Pim Suwannarat; Andrea Burnett-Hartman; Nikki Carroll; Michelle Turner; Kristen Janes; Christine Truong; Erica Blum-Barnett; Nazneen Aziz; Elizabeth A McGlynn
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2019-11-01

10.  Proportion of adults in the general population of Stockholm County who want gender-affirming medical treatment.

Authors:  Jill W Åhs; Cecilia Dhejne; Cecilia Magnusson; Henrik Dal; Andreas Lundin; Stefan Arver; Christina Dalman; Kyriaki Kosidou
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-05       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.