Literature DB >> 27390303

Fukuoka criteria accurately predict risk for adverse outcomes during follow-up of pancreatic cysts presumed to be intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms.

Saurabh Mukewar1, Nicolo de Pretis1, Anupama Aryal-Khanal1, Nazir Ahmed1, Raghuwansh Sah1, Felicity Enders2, Joseph J Larson2, Michael J Levy1, Naoki Takahashi3, Mark Topazian1, Randall Pearson1, Santhi S Vege1, Suresh T Chari1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Fukuoka consensus guidelines classify pancreatic cystic lesions (PCLs) presumed to be intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) into Fukuoka positive (FP) (subgroups of high-risk (HR) and worrisome features (WFs)) and Fukuoka negative (FN) (non-HR feature/WF cysts). We retrospectively estimated 5-year risk of pancreatic cancer (PC) in FN, WF and HR cysts of patients with PCL-IPMN.
DESIGN: From Mayo Clinic databases, we randomly selected 2000 patients reported to have a PCL; we excluded inflammatory or suspected non-IPMN cysts and those without imaging follow-up. We re-reviewed cross-sectional imaging and abstracted clinical and follow-up data on PCL-IPMNs. The study contained 802 patients with FN cysts and 358 with FP cysts.
RESULTS: Patients with PCL-IPMN had median (IQR) follow-up of 4.2 (1.8-7.1) years. Among FN cysts, 5-year PC risk was low (2-3%) regardless of cyst size (p=0.67). After excluding events in the first 6 months, 5-year PC risk remained low (0-2%) regardless of cyst size (p=0.61). Among FP cysts, HR cysts (n=66) had greater 5-year PC risk than WF cysts (n=292) (49.7% vs 4.1%; p<0.001). In HR cysts, 3-year PC risk was greatest for obstructive jaundice versus enhancing solid component or main pancreatic duct >10 mm (79.8% vs 37.3% vs 39.4%, respectively; p=0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: Fukuoka guidelines accurately stratify PCL-IPMNs for PC risk, with FN cysts having lowest and HR cysts having greatest risk. After 6-month follow-up, WF and FN cysts had a low 5-year PC risk. Surveillance strategies should be tailored appropriately. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/.

Entities:  

Keywords:  PANCREATIC CANCER; PANCREATIC EPIDEMIOLOGY; PANCREATIC SURGERY; PANCREATIC TUMOURS

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27390303     DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2016-311615

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gut        ISSN: 0017-5749            Impact factor:   23.059


  22 in total

1.  Predicting the Grade of Dysplasia of Pancreatic Cystic Neoplasms Using Cyst Fluid DNA Methylation Markers.

Authors:  Tatsuo Hata; Marco Dal Molin; Seung-Mo Hong; Koji Tamura; Masaya Suenaga; Jun Yu; Hiraku Sedogawa; Matthew J Weiss; Christopher L Wolfgang; Anne Marie Lennon; Ralph H Hruban; Michael G Goggins
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 2.  Molecular Diagnostics and Testing for Pancreatic Cysts.

Authors:  Jaime de la Fuente; Shounak Majumder
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-01-27

3.  Pancreatic Juice Mutation Concentrations Can Help Predict the Grade of Dysplasia in Patients Undergoing Pancreatic Surveillance.

Authors:  Masaya Suenaga; Jun Yu; Koji Shindo; Koji Tamura; Jose Alejandro Almario; Christopher Zaykoski; P Dane Witmer; Shahriar Fesharakizadeh; Michael Borges; Anne-Marie Lennon; Eun-Ji Shin; Marcia Irene Canto; Michael Goggins
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2018-01-04       Impact factor: 12.531

4.  New light on the pancreatic cyst conundrum.

Authors:  Nathan A Berger
Journal:  Transl Cancer Res       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 1.241

5.  Simple Detection of Telomere Fusions in Pancreatic Cancer, Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasm, and Pancreatic Cyst Fluid.

Authors:  Tatsuo Hata; Marco Dal Molin; Anne McGregor-Das; Tae Jun Song; Christopher Wolfgang; James R Eshleman; Ralph H Hruban; Michael Goggins
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2017-12-08       Impact factor: 5.568

Review 6.  [Cystic pancreatic tumors: diagnostics and new biomarkers].

Authors:  A W Berger; T Seufferlein; A Kleger
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 7.  Pancreatic Cysts and Guidelines.

Authors:  James J Farrell
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2017-05-20       Impact factor: 3.199

8.  Editorial: Stopping Pancreatic Cyst Surveillance?

Authors:  James J Farrell
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 9.  Surveillance of Cystic Lesions of the Pancreas: Whom and How to Survey?

Authors:  Stefano Andrianello; Massimo Falconi; Roberto Salvia; Stefano Crippa; Giovanni Marchegiani
Journal:  Visc Med       Date:  2018-06-13

Review 10.  [Early stage pancreatic cancer].

Authors:  C Kahlert; M Distler; D Aust; L Gieldon; J Weitz; T Welsch
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 0.955

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.