Literature DB >> 27390256

GetReal: from efficacy in clinical trials to relative effectiveness in the real world.

Matthias Egger1,2, Karel G M Moons3,4, Christine Fletcher5.   

Abstract

The GetReal consortium ("incorporating real-life data into drug development") addresses the efficacy-effectiveness gap that opens between the data from well-controlled randomized trials in selected patient groups submitted to regulators and the real-world evidence on effectiveness and safety of drugs required by decision makers. Workpackage 4 of GetReal develops evidence synthesis and modelling approaches to generate the real-world evidence. In this commentary, we discuss how questions change when moving from the well-controlled randomized trial setting to real-life medical practice, the evidence required to answer these questions, the populations to which estimates will be applicable to and the methods and data sources used to produce these estimates. We then introduce the methodological reviews written by GetReal authors and published in Research Synthesis Methods on network meta-analysis, individual patient data meta-analysis and mathematical modelling to predict drug effectiveness. The critical reviews of key methods are a good starting point for the ambitious programme of work GetReal has embarked on. The different strands of work under way in GetReal have great potential to contribute to making clinical trials research as relevant as it can be to patients, caregivers and policy makers.
Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27390256     DOI: 10.1002/jrsm.1207

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Res Synth Methods        ISSN: 1759-2879            Impact factor:   5.273


  6 in total

1.  The development of CHAMP: a checklist for the appraisal of moderators and predictors.

Authors:  Ralph van Hoorn; Marcia Tummers; Andrew Booth; Ansgar Gerhardus; Eva Rehfuess; Daniel Hind; Patrick M Bossuyt; Vivian Welch; Thomas P A Debray; Martin Underwood; Pim Cuijpers; Helena Kraemer; Gert Jan van der Wilt; Wietkse Kievit
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2017-12-21       Impact factor: 4.615

2.  A multi-center, randomized controlled clinical trial, cost-effectiveness and qualitative research of electroacupuncture with usual care for patients with non-acute pain after back surgery: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Byung-Cheul Shin; Jae-Heung Cho; In-Hyuk Ha; In Heo; Jun-Hwan Lee; Koh-Woon Kim; Me-Riong Kim; So-Young Jung; Ojin Kwon; Nam-Kwen Kim; Haeng-Mi Son; Dong-Wuk Son; Kyung-Min Shin
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2018-01-24       Impact factor: 2.279

3.  Recognizing that Evidence is Made, not Born.

Authors:  Robyn Lim; David K Lee; Pierre Sabourin; John Ferguson; Marilyn Metcalf; Meredith Smith; Solange Corriol-Rohou; Hans-Georg Eichler; Murray Lumpkin; Gigi Hirsch; Inhua Muijrers Chen; Brian O'Rourke; Anja Schiel; Nick Crabb; Naomi Aronson; Edmund Pezalla; Marc Boutin; Louise Binder; Linda Wilhelm
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2019-01-04       Impact factor: 6.875

4.  Synthesizing existing evidence to design future trials: survey of methodologists from European institutions.

Authors:  Adriani Nikolakopoulou; Sven Trelle; Alex J Sutton; Matthias Egger; Georgia Salanti
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2019-06-07       Impact factor: 2.279

5.  Developing WHO guidelines: Time to formally include evidence from mathematical modelling studies.

Authors:  Matthias Egger; Leigh Johnson; Christian Althaus; Anna Schöni; Georgia Salanti; Nicola Low; Susan L Norris
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2017-08-29

Review 6.  Trial designs using real-world data: The changing landscape of the regulatory approval process.

Authors:  Elodie Baumfeld Andre; Robert Reynolds; Patrick Caubel; Laurent Azoulay; Nancy A Dreyer
Journal:  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf       Date:  2019-12-10       Impact factor: 2.890

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.