Literature DB >> 27390063

IVF outcomes in average- and poor-prognosis infertile women according to the number of embryos transferred.

Mario G Vega1, Norbert Gleicher2, Sarah K Darmon3, Andrea Weghofer4, Yan-Guang Wu3, Qi Wang3, Lin Zhang3, David F Albertini5, David H Barad6, Vitaly A Kushnir7.   

Abstract

Outcome measures of IVF success, which account for effectiveness of IVF and perinatal outcome risks, have recently been described. The association between number of embryos transferred in average and poor-prognosis IVF patients, and the chances of having good or poor IVF and perinatal outcomes, was investigated. Good IVF and perinatal outcome was defined as the birth of a live, term, normal-weight infant (≥2500 g). Poor IVF and perinatal outcome was defined as no live birth or birth of a very low weight neonate (<1500 g) or severe prematurity (birth at <32 weeks gestation). Each neonate was analysed as a separate outcome. A total of 713 IVF cycles in 504 average and poor-prognosis patients from January 2010 to December 2013 were identified. The odds of having good IVF and perinatal outcomes increased by 28% for each additional embryo transferred. The odds of poor IVF and perinatal outcome decreased by 32% with an additional embryo transferred. The likelihood of live birth with good perinatal outcome in average- and poor-prognosis patients after IVF increases with additional embryos being transferred. These data add to recently reported evidence in favour of multiple embryo transfer in older women and those with average or poor IVF prognosis.
Copyright © 2016 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  IVF; perinatal outcomes; poor prognosis patients; poor responders

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27390063     DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2016.06.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online        ISSN: 1472-6483            Impact factor:   3.828


  7 in total

1.  Premature ovarian insufficiency patients with viable embryos derived from autologous oocytes through repeated oocyte retrievals could obtain reasonable cumulative pregnancy outcomes following frozen-embryo transfer.

Authors:  Xiuxian Zhu; Jing Ye; Yonglun Fu
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-04

Review 2.  Systematic review of worldwide trends in assisted reproductive technology 2004-2013.

Authors:  Vitaly A Kushnir; David H Barad; David F Albertini; Sarah K Darmon; Norbert Gleicher
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2017-01-10       Impact factor: 5.211

3.  Observational retrospective study of US national utilisation patterns and live birth rates for various ovarian stimulation protocols for in vitro fertilisation.

Authors:  Vitaly A Kushnir; Sarah K Darmon; David H Barad; Norbert Gleicher
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-11-08       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  The Effect of Additional Embryo Transfer on the Pregnancy Rate in Young Women Receiving in vitro Fertilization: A Natural Experiment Study.

Authors:  Ran Kim; Seung-Ah Choe; Eun A Park; Myung Joo Kim; Young-Sang Kim; You Shin Kim
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2021-04-12

5.  Modeling In Vitro Fertilization Data Considering Multiple Outcomes Observed among Iranian Infertile Women.

Authors:  Azadeh Ghaheri; Aliakbar Rasekhi; Reza Omani Samani; Ebrahim Hajizadeh
Journal:  Int J Fertil Steril       Date:  2018-01-07

6.  Cumulative live-birth, perinatal and obstetric outcomes for POSEIDON groups after IVF/ICSI cycles: a single-center retrospective study.

Authors:  Raed K Abdullah; Nenghui Liu; Yuhao Zhao; Yang Shuang; Zhang Shen; Hong Zeng; Jielei Wu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-07-16       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  POSEIDON classification and the proposed treatment options for groups 1 and 2: time to revisit? A retrospective analysis of 1425 ART cycles.

Authors:  Parimala Chinta; Belavendra Antonisamy; Ann M Mangalaraj; Aleyamma T Kunjummen; Mohan S Kamath
Journal:  Hum Reprod Open       Date:  2021-02-14
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.