Samuel R Greig1, Timothy J Cooper2, Doron D Sommer3, Salil Nair4, Erin D Wright2. 1. Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada. gresa1@yahoo.co.nz. 2. Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada. 3. Division of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. 4. Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Auckland District Health Board, Auckland, New Zealand.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The use of endoscopic endonasal approaches to the anterior skull base has dramatically expanded in recent years, with clinical endpoints and complication rates that compare favorably to traditional approaches. The impact of the endoscopic approach on sinonasal function has been less rigorously evaluated. The purpose of this study was to systematically analyze the literature evaluating objective sinonasal outcomes in endoscopic anterior skull-base surgery, and provide evidence-based recommendations. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was performed based on a published guideline for developing an evidence-based review with recommendations. Objective sinonasal outcomes included were olfaction, mucociliary clearance, and nasal airflow. RESULTS: Ten articles were identified addressing objective olfactory outcomes: 2 randomized controlled trials; 6 cohort studies; and 2 retrospective case series. One cohort study investigating mucociliary clearance was identified. Six studies reporting postoperative endoscopic outcomes were identified. CONCLUSION: Based on the available evidence, nasoseptal flap (NSF) elevation with or without use in reconstruction likely leads to impairment in objective olfactory function. Endoscopic sellar and parasellar surgery without the elevation of an NSF may lead to a transient reduction in olfactory function. In the absence of a high a priori risk of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak, it is an option to avoid routine NSF elevation in sellar and parasellar procedures, with preservation of at least 1 vascular pedicle during the approach. Monopolar electrocautery for mucosal incisions may increase the risk of olfactory impairment. If an NSF is used, donor site defect reconstruction may be considered.
BACKGROUND: The use of endoscopic endonasal approaches to the anterior skull base has dramatically expanded in recent years, with clinical endpoints and complication rates that compare favorably to traditional approaches. The impact of the endoscopic approach on sinonasal function has been less rigorously evaluated. The purpose of this study was to systematically analyze the literature evaluating objective sinonasal outcomes in endoscopic anterior skull-base surgery, and provide evidence-based recommendations. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was performed based on a published guideline for developing an evidence-based review with recommendations. Objective sinonasal outcomes included were olfaction, mucociliary clearance, and nasal airflow. RESULTS: Ten articles were identified addressing objective olfactory outcomes: 2 randomized controlled trials; 6 cohort studies; and 2 retrospective case series. One cohort study investigating mucociliary clearance was identified. Six studies reporting postoperative endoscopic outcomes were identified. CONCLUSION: Based on the available evidence, nasoseptal flap (NSF) elevation with or without use in reconstruction likely leads to impairment in objective olfactory function. Endoscopic sellar and parasellar surgery without the elevation of an NSF may lead to a transient reduction in olfactory function. In the absence of a high a priori risk of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak, it is an option to avoid routine NSF elevation in sellar and parasellar procedures, with preservation of at least 1 vascular pedicle during the approach. Monopolar electrocautery for mucosal incisions may increase the risk of olfactory impairment. If an NSF is used, donor site defect reconstruction may be considered.
Authors: Edward C Kuan; Frederick Yoo; Jennifer Chyu; Angela Oh; Marvin Bergsneider; Marilene B Wang Journal: J Neurol Surg B Skull Base Date: 2017-11-07
Authors: Carol H Yan; Aakanksha Rathor; Kaelyn Krook; Yifei Ma; Melissa R Rotella; Robert L Dodd; Peter H Hwang; Jayakar V Nayak; Nelson M Oyesiku; John M DelGaudio; Joshua M Levy; Justin Wise; Sarah K Wise; Zara M Patel Journal: Neurosurgery Date: 2020-08-01 Impact factor: 4.654
Authors: Martin Hanson; Hao Li; Eliza Geer; Sasan Karimi; Viviane Tabar; Marc A Cohen Journal: World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg Date: 2020-03-20
Authors: Milap D Raikundalia; Ryan J Huang; Lyndon Chan; Tracy Truong; Maragatha Kuchibhatla; James Merchant; Ralph Abi Hachem; Patrick J Codd; Ali R Zomorodi; Jordan I Teitelbaum; Bradley J Goldstein; David W Jang Journal: Allergy Rhinol (Providence) Date: 2021-10-29