Literature DB >> 27389314

Combined comparative genomic hybridization and single-nucleotide polymorphism array detects cryptic chromosomal lesions in both myelodysplastic syndromes and cytopenias of undetermined significance.

Andrew G Evans1, Ausaf Ahmad1, W Richard Burack1, M Anwar Iqbal1.   

Abstract

The diagnosis of myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) can be challenging, and may be facilitated by correlation with cytogenetic testing. Microarray analysis using comparative genomic hybridization and/or single-nucleotide polymorphism array can detect chromosomal abnormalities not seen by standard metaphase cytogenetics. We examined the ability of combined comparative genomic hybridization and single-nucleotide polymorphism analysis (hereafter referred to as 'combined array') to detect changes among 83 patients with unexplained cytopenias undergoing pathologic evaluation for MDS and compared results with 18 normal bone marrow controls. Thirty-seven patients (45%) were diagnosed with MDS, 12 patients (14%) were demonstrated to have 'indeterminate dyspoiesis' (insufficient for classification of MDS), 27 (33%) were essentially normal, and 7 patients (8%) had alternative pathologic diagnoses. Twenty-one MDS patients (57% of diagnoses) had effectively normal metaphase cytogenetics, but combined array showed that 5 of these (13% of MDS patients) harbored major cryptic chromosomal aberrations. Furthermore, nearly half of patients with 'indeterminate dyspoiesis' and 1 with normal morphology had clonal cytopenia(s) of undetermined significance by combined array analysis. Cryptic array findings among MDS patients and those with clonal cytopenias(s) included large-scale copy-neutral loss of heterozygosity (up to 118 Mb) and genomic deletion of loci implicated in MDS pathogenesis (eg, TET2 (4q22) and NUP98 (11p15)). By comparison, in MDS patients with abnormal metaphase cytogenetics, microarray mostly recapitulated findings seen by routine karyotype. Combined array analysis has considerable diagnostic yield in detecting cryptic chromosomal aberrations in MDS and in demonstrating aberrant clonal hematopoiesis in cytopenic patients with indeterminate morphologic dysplasia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27389314     DOI: 10.1038/modpathol.2016.104

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mod Pathol        ISSN: 0893-3952            Impact factor:   7.842


  46 in total

1.  Comprehensive array CGH of normal karyotype myelodysplastic syndromes reveals hidden recurrent and individual genomic copy number alterations with prognostic relevance.

Authors:  A Thiel; M Beier; D Ingenhag; K Servan; M Hein; V Moeller; B Betz; B Hildebrandt; C Evers; U Germing; B Royer-Pokora
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2011-01-28       Impact factor: 11.528

2.  Clinical effect of point mutations in myelodysplastic syndromes.

Authors:  Rafael Bejar; Kristen Stevenson; Omar Abdel-Wahab; Naomi Galili; Björn Nilsson; Guillermo Garcia-Manero; Hagop Kantarjian; Azra Raza; Ross L Levine; Donna Neuberg; Benjamin L Ebert
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-06-30       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Deletion 1q43 encompassing only CHRM3 in a patient with autistic disorder.

Authors:  Andrea Klunder Petersen; Ausaf Ahmad; Mustafa Shafiq; Brigette Brown-Kipphut; Chin-To Fong; M Anwar Iqbal
Journal:  Eur J Med Genet       Date:  2012-12-16       Impact factor: 2.708

4.  Molecular definition of chromosome arm 5q deletion end points and detection of hidden aberrations in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes and isolated del(5q) using oligonucleotide array CGH.

Authors:  Christina Evers; Manfred Beier; Anne Poelitz; Barbara Hildebrandt; Kati Servan; Matthias Drechsler; Ulrich Germing; Hans-Dieter Royer; Brigitte Royer-Pokora
Journal:  Genes Chromosomes Cancer       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 5.006

5.  New insights into the prognostic impact of the karyotype in MDS and correlation with subtypes: evidence from a core dataset of 2124 patients.

Authors:  Detlef Haase; Ulrich Germing; Julie Schanz; Michael Pfeilstöcker; Thomas Nösslinger; Barbara Hildebrandt; Andrea Kundgen; Michael Lübbert; Regina Kunzmann; Aristoteles A N Giagounidis; Carlo Aul; Lorenz Trümper; Otto Krieger; Reinhard Stauder; Thomas H Müller; Friedrich Wimazal; Peter Valent; Christa Fonatsch; Christian Steidl
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2007-08-28       Impact factor: 22.113

6.  Acquired mutations in TET2 are common in myelodysplastic syndromes.

Authors:  Saskia M C Langemeijer; Roland P Kuiper; Marieke Berends; Ruth Knops; Mariam G Aslanyan; Marion Massop; Ellen Stevens-Linders; Patricia van Hoogen; Ad Geurts van Kessel; Reinier A P Raymakers; Eveline J Kamping; Gregor E Verhoef; Estelle Verburgh; Anne Hagemeijer; Peter Vandenberghe; Theo de Witte; Bert A van der Reijden; Joop H Jansen
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2009-05-31       Impact factor: 38.330

7.  Leukemic transformation by the MLL-AF6 fusion oncogene requires the H3K79 methyltransferase Dot1l.

Authors:  Aniruddha J Deshpande; Liying Chen; Maurizio Fazio; Amit U Sinha; Kathrin M Bernt; Deepti Banka; Stuart Dias; Jenny Chang; Edward J Olhava; Scott R Daigle; Victoria M Richon; Roy M Pollock; Scott A Armstrong
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2013-01-29       Impact factor: 22.113

8.  Prevalence and prognostic significance of allelic imbalance by single-nucleotide polymorphism analysis in low-risk myelodysplastic syndromes.

Authors:  Azim Mohamedali; Joop Gäken; Natalie A Twine; Wendy Ingram; Nigel Westwood; Nicholas C Lea; Janet Hayden; Nora Donaldson; Carlo Aul; Norbert Gattermann; Aristotle Giagounidis; Ulrich Germing; Alan F List; Ghulam J Mufti
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2007-07-18       Impact factor: 22.113

9.  MLL-AF6 fusion oncogene sequesters AF6 into the nucleus to trigger RAS activation in myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Elena Manara; Emma Baron; Claudia Tregnago; Sanja Aveic; Valeria Bisio; Silvia Bresolin; Riccardo Masetti; Franco Locatelli; Giuseppe Basso; Martina Pigazzi
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 22.113

10.  Microarray-based genomic profiling and in situ hybridization on fibrotic bone marrow biopsies for the identification of numerical chromosomal abnormalities in myelodysplastic syndrome.

Authors:  Marian Jpl Stevens-Kroef; Konnie M Hebeda; Eugène T Verwiel; Eveline J Kamping; Patricia H van Cleef; Roland P Kuiper; Patricia Jta Groenen
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2015-05-28       Impact factor: 2.009

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  The complex karyotype in hematological malignancies: a comprehensive overview by the Francophone Group of Hematological Cytogenetics (GFCH).

Authors:  F Nguyen-Khac; A Bidet; A Daudignon; M Lafage-Pochitaloff; G Ameye; C Bilhou-Nabéra; E Chapiro; M A Collonge-Rame; W Cuccuini; N Douet-Guilbert; V Eclache; I Luquet; L Michaux; N Nadal; D Penther; B Quilichini; C Terre; C Lefebvre; M-B Troadec; L Véronèse
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2022-04-16       Impact factor: 12.883

2.  Identify latent chromosomal aberrations relevant to myelodysplastic syndromes.

Authors:  Qibin Song; Yuxin Chu; Yi Yao; Min Peng; Weihong Yang; Xiaoqing Li; Shiang Huang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-09-04       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Combining metaphase cytogenetics with single nucleotide polymorphism arrays can improve the diagnostic yield and identify prognosis more precisely in myelodysplastic syndromes.

Authors:  Yao Qin; Hang Zhang; Lin Feng; Haichen Wei; Yuling Wu; Chaoran Jiang; Zhihong Xu; Huanling Zhu; Ting Liu
Journal:  Ann Med       Date:  2022-12       Impact factor: 5.348

Review 4.  Techniques for detecting chromosomal aberrations in myelodysplastic syndromes.

Authors:  Qibin Song; Min Peng; Yuxin Chu; Shiang Huang
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-05-09

5.  Single-Nucleotide Polymorphism Array Technique Generating Valuable Risk-Stratification Information for Patients With Myelodysplastic Syndromes.

Authors:  Xia Xiao; Xiaoyuan He; Qing Li; Wei Zhang; Haibo Zhu; Weihong Yang; Yuming Li; Li Geng; Hui Liu; Lijuan Li; Huaquan Wang; Rong Fu; Mingfeng Zhao; Zhong Chen; Zonghong Shao
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2020-07-07       Impact factor: 6.244

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.