Xiaofei Li1,2, Caiyuan Yu1,3, Tiansheng Wang4, Ken Chen1, Suodi Zhai1, Huilin Tang5. 1. Department of Pharmacy, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, 100191, China. 2. First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, 150001, China. 3. The Open University of China, Beijing, 100039, China. 4. Department of Pharmacy Administration and Clinical Pharmacy, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing, 100191, China. 5. Department of Pharmacy, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, 100191, China. hltang1985@bjmu.edu.cn.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Genetic polymorphisms of cytochrome P450 enzymes, especially CYP2C19, could influence voriconazole pharmacokinetics. The association between CYP2C19 polymorphisms and voriconazole clinical outcomes is not well established. The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the effect of CYP2C19 polymorphisms on clinical outcomes in patients treated with voriconazole. METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, CENTRAL, ClinicalTrials.gov, and three Chinese databases were searched from their inception to January 2016 to identify eligible trials that reported voriconazole exposure and clinical outcomes of voriconazole according to CYP2C19 polymorphisms. Two reviewers independently reviewed the citations, extracted the data, and assessed the quality of the trials. The meta-analysis was performed using RevMan5.3. RESULTS: A total of ten studies involving 598 patients were included. Compared with patients with extensive metabolizer (EM) phenotype, patients with poor metabolizer (PM) phenotype had significantly higher trough concentrations (MD, 1.22 mg/L; 95 % confidence interval (CI), 0.72-1.71; P < 0.0001). PM phenotype was also associated with a higher treatment success rate compared with EM phenotype (risk ratio (RR), 1.31; 95 % CI, 1.04-1.67; P = 0.02). However, there was no significant association between CYP2C19 polymorphisms and daily maintenance dose, overall adverse events, hepatotoxicity, and neurotoxicity. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with CYP2C19 PM phenotype were associated with increased treatment success rate and trough concentrations as compared with those with EM phenotype. There was no significant association between CYP2C19 polymorphisms and either daily maintenance dose or adverse outcomes of voriconazole. However, large-scale, high-quality trials are still needed to confirm these findings.
BACKGROUND: Genetic polymorphisms of cytochrome P450 enzymes, especially CYP2C19, could influence voriconazole pharmacokinetics. The association between CYP2C19 polymorphisms and voriconazole clinical outcomes is not well established. The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the effect of CYP2C19 polymorphisms on clinical outcomes in patients treated with voriconazole. METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, CENTRAL, ClinicalTrials.gov, and three Chinese databases were searched from their inception to January 2016 to identify eligible trials that reported voriconazole exposure and clinical outcomes of voriconazole according to CYP2C19 polymorphisms. Two reviewers independently reviewed the citations, extracted the data, and assessed the quality of the trials. The meta-analysis was performed using RevMan5.3. RESULTS: A total of ten studies involving 598 patients were included. Compared with patients with extensive metabolizer (EM) phenotype, patients with poor metabolizer (PM) phenotype had significantly higher trough concentrations (MD, 1.22 mg/L; 95 % confidence interval (CI), 0.72-1.71; P < 0.0001). PM phenotype was also associated with a higher treatment success rate compared with EM phenotype (risk ratio (RR), 1.31; 95 % CI, 1.04-1.67; P = 0.02). However, there was no significant association between CYP2C19 polymorphisms and daily maintenance dose, overall adverse events, hepatotoxicity, and neurotoxicity. CONCLUSIONS:Patients with CYP2C19 PM phenotype were associated with increased treatment success rate and trough concentrations as compared with those with EM phenotype. There was no significant association between CYP2C19 polymorphisms and either daily maintenance dose or adverse outcomes of voriconazole. However, large-scale, high-quality trials are still needed to confirm these findings.
Authors: Brad Moriyama; Sameer Kadri; Stacey A Henning; Robert L Danner; Thomas J Walsh; Scott R Penzak Journal: Curr Fungal Infect Rep Date: 2015-04-16
Authors: Sarah C Sim; Carl Risinger; Marja-Liisa Dahl; Eleni Aklillu; Magnus Christensen; Leif Bertilsson; Magnus Ingelman-Sundberg Journal: Clin Pharmacol Ther Date: 2006-01 Impact factor: 6.875
Authors: Elizabeth L Pestka; Ann M Hale; Bonnie L Johnson; Joy L Lee; Kathleen A Poppe Journal: J Psychosoc Nurs Ment Health Serv Date: 2007-10 Impact factor: 1.098
Authors: Michael J Dolton; Gerd Mikus; Johanna Weiss; John E Ray; Andrew J McLachlan Journal: J Antimicrob Chemother Date: 2014-02-18 Impact factor: 5.790
Authors: Roger J M Brüggemann; N M A Blijlevens; David M Burger; Barbara Franke; Peter F Troke; J Peter Donnelly Journal: J Antimicrob Chemother Date: 2010-01 Impact factor: 5.790
Authors: Aniwaa Owusu Obeng; Eric F Egelund; Abdullah Alsultan; Charles A Peloquin; Julie A Johnson Journal: Pharmacotherapy Date: 2014-02-07 Impact factor: 4.705