Literature DB >> 27388286

Non-Target Impacts of an Attract-and-Kill Formulation Based on Plant Volatiles: Responses of some Generalist Predators.

Peter C Gregg1, Alice P Del Socorro2, Matthew R Binns2.   

Abstract

Responses of non-target insects to a blend of plant volatiles used as components in an attract-and-kill formulation for Helicoverpa spp. (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) were studied in an Australian cotton field. Two experiments, one involving suction sampling during the day and the other at night, were conducted. Rows that had been treated with the volatile blend, with no added insecticide, were sampled with a large suction sampler 18, 42, and 85 h (day experiment) and 6, 30, and 78 h (night experiment) after treatment. Rows located 5, 10, 20, and 300 m away from the treated row were similarly sampled. Of seven generalist predators, only one accumulated on the treated rows compared to the untreated rows. Of the other six, five were found in lower numbers on the treated rows, and for one no significant effects were detected. Compared to pre-spray baseline levels, numbers of several taxa increased across the whole field after spraying, suggesting area-wide attraction, but localized responses to the treated rows were weak, and apparent repellence was more common than attraction. We suggest that attract-and-kill with plant volatiles should have minimal effects on populations of these predators, and is likely to be compatible with integrated pest management.

Keywords:  Attract-and-kill; Cotton; Non-target insects; Plant volatiles; Suction sampling

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27388286     DOI: 10.1007/s10886-016-0727-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Ecol        ISSN: 0098-0331            Impact factor:   2.626


  8 in total

Review 1.  Insect host location: a volatile situation.

Authors:  Toby J A Bruce; Lester J Wadhams; Christine M Woodcock
Journal:  Trends Plant Sci       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 18.313

Review 2.  Sex pheromones and their impact on pest management.

Authors:  Peter Witzgall; Philipp Kirsch; Alan Cork
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2010-01-28       Impact factor: 2.626

Review 3.  Simultaneous inference in general parametric models.

Authors:  Torsten Hothorn; Frank Bretz; Peter Westfall
Journal:  Biom J       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.207

Review 4.  The non-target impact of spinosyns on beneficial arthropods.

Authors:  Antonio Biondi; Veerle Mommaerts; Guy Smagghe; Elisa Viñuela; Lucia Zappalà; Nicolas Desneux
Journal:  Pest Manag Sci       Date:  2012-10-29       Impact factor: 4.845

5.  Mortality and reproductive effects of ingested spinosad on adult bollworms.

Authors:  Juan D López; Mohamed A Latheef; Wesley C Hoffmann
Journal:  Pest Manag Sci       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 4.845

6.  Associative learning of plant odorants activating the same or different receptor neurones in the moth Heliothis virescens.

Authors:  H T Skiri; M Stranden; J C Sandoz; R Menzel; H Mustaparta
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.312

7.  Biocontrol potential of essential oil monoterpenes against housefly, Musca domestica (Diptera: Muscidae).

Authors:  Peeyush Kumar; Sapna Mishra; Anushree Malik; Santosh Satya
Journal:  Ecotoxicol Environ Saf       Date:  2013-12-20       Impact factor: 6.291

8.  Interaction of acetic acid and phenylacetaldehyde as attractants for trapping pest species of moths (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae).

Authors:  Peter J Landolt; Miklós Tóth; Robert L Meagher; István Szarukán
Journal:  Pest Manag Sci       Date:  2012-08-07       Impact factor: 4.845

  8 in total
  1 in total

1.  Bisexual Attract-and-Kill: A Novel Component of Resistance Management for Transgenic Cotton in Australia.

Authors:  Peter C Gregg; Alice P Del Socorro; Sarah Wilson; Kristen M Knight; Matthew R Binns; Philip Armytage
Journal:  J Econ Entomol       Date:  2022-06-08       Impact factor: 2.447

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.