Literature DB >> 27387966

Evidence & Gap Maps: A tool for promoting evidence informed policy and strategic research agendas.

Birte Snilstveit1, Martina Vojtkova2, Ami Bhavsar3, Jennifer Stevenson3, Marie Gaarder4.   

Abstract

A range of organizations are engaged in the production of evidence on the effects of health, social, and economic development programs on human welfare outcomes. However, evidence is often scattered around different databases, web sites, and the gray literature and is often presented in inaccessible formats. Lack of overview of the evidence in a specific field can be a barrier to the use of existing research and prevent efficient use of limited resources for new research. Evidence & Gap Maps (EGMs) aim to address these issues and complement existing synthesis and mapping approaches. EGMs are a new addition to the tools available to support evidence-informed policymaking. To provide an accessible resource for researchers, commissioners, and decision makers, EGMs provide thematic collections of evidence structured around a framework which schematically represents the types of interventions and outcomes of relevance to a particular sector. By mapping the existing evidence using this framework, EGMs provide a visual overview of what we know and do not know about the effects of different programs. They make existing evidence available, and by providing links to user-friendly summaries of relevant studies, EGMs can facilitate the use of existing evidence for decision making. They identify key "gaps" where little or no evidence from impact evaluations and systematic reviews is available and can be a valuable resource to inform a strategic approach to building the evidence base in a particular sector. The article will introduce readers to the concept and methods of EGMs and present a demonstration of the EGM tool using existing examples. Copyright Â
© 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  EGM; Evidence synthesis; Evidence-informed policy; Impact evaluation; Research prioritization; Systematic review

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27387966     DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.05.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol        ISSN: 0895-4356            Impact factor:   6.437


  43 in total

1.  Sustainability: Map the evidence.

Authors:  Madeleine C McKinnon; Samantha H Cheng; Ruth Garside; Yuta J Masuda; Daniel C Miller
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-12-10       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 2.  Evidence mapping of clinical practice guidelines recommendations and quality for depression in children and adolescents.

Authors:  Meili Yan; Lingmin Chen; Min Yang; Li Zhang; Mingming Niu; Fangfang Wu; Yamin Chen; Ziwei Song; Yonggang Zhang; Jiang Li; Jinhui Tian
Journal:  Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  2022-03-09       Impact factor: 4.785

3.  Healthcare Service Interventions to Improve the Healthcare Outcomes of Hospitalised Patients with Extreme Obesity: Protocol for an Evidence and Gap Map.

Authors:  Caz Hales; Rebecca Chrystall; Anne M Haase; Mona Jeffreys
Journal:  Methods Protoc       Date:  2022-06-08

4.  Assessing the Evidence of Micronutrients on Depression among Children and Adolescents: An Evidence Gap Map.

Authors:  Susan C Campisi; Clare Zasowski; Shailja Shah; Ashka Shah; Glyneva Bradley-Ridout; Daphne J Korczak; Peter Szatmari
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 8.701

Review 5.  Documenting research with transgender and gender diverse people: protocol for an evidence map and thematic analysis.

Authors:  Zack Marshall; Vivian Welch; James Thomas; Fern Brunger; Michelle Swab; Ian Shemilt; Chris Kaposy
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2017-02-20

6.  Using HTA and guideline development as a tool for research priority setting the NICE way: reducing research waste by identifying the right research to fund.

Authors:  Tarang Sharma; Moni Choudhury; Juan Carlos Rejón-Parrilla; Pall Jonsson; Sarah Garner
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-03-08       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 7.  Wearing masks to reduce the spread of respiratory viruses: a systematic evidence mapping.

Authors:  Yanfei Li; Zhipeng Wei; Jingyun Zhang; Rui Li; Huijuan Li; Liujiao Cao; Liangying Hou; Weiyi Zhang; Nan Chen; Kangle Guo; Xiuxia Li; Kehu Yang
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-05

Review 8.  Availability of evidence on cataract in low/middle-income settings: a review of reviews using evidence gap maps approach.

Authors:  Bhavisha Virendrakumar; Emma Jolley; Iris Gordon; Cova Bascaran; Elena Schmidt
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-06-06       Impact factor: 4.638

Review 9.  Toward a comprehensive evidence map of overview of systematic review methods: paper 1-purpose, eligibility, search and data extraction.

Authors:  Carole Lunny; Sue E Brennan; Steve McDonald; Joanne E McKenzie
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2017-11-21

Review 10.  Management of recurrent pancreatic cancer after surgical resection: a protocol for systematic review, evidence mapping and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jong-Chan Lee; Soyeon Ahn; In Kuk Cho; Jongchan Lee; Jaihwan Kim; Jin-Hyeok Hwang
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-04-09       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.