Steven A Gordon1, Evan R Reiter1. 1. Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, Virginia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Critical care pathways (CCPs) are implemented within health care systems as a means to systematically decrease resource utilization, whereas maintaining a high level of care for patients with a specific diagnosis. Previous studies have shown equivocal results for CCPs in head and neck cancer surgery. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review evaluating studies of CCPs for head and neck cancer surgery, with individual outcome measures analyzed separately to describe the effect of each implemented pathway. RESULTS: Ten before and after studies were included for systematic review. Nine reported statistically significant decreases in median/mean length of stay and 5 reported statistically significant decreases in cost of care per case. CONCLUSION: Although the results are encouraging and point toward the ability of CCPs to decrease length of stay and cost of care, the evidence cannot be considered exhaustive because of the studies' inability to account for temporal trends. Further controlled studies are recommended to validate the benefits of CCPs.
BACKGROUND: Critical care pathways (CCPs) are implemented within health care systems as a means to systematically decrease resource utilization, whereas maintaining a high level of care for patients with a specific diagnosis. Previous studies have shown equivocal results for CCPs in head and neck cancer surgery. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review evaluating studies of CCPs for head and neck cancer surgery, with individual outcome measures analyzed separately to describe the effect of each implemented pathway. RESULTS: Ten before and after studies were included for systematic review. Nine reported statistically significant decreases in median/mean length of stay and 5 reported statistically significant decreases in cost of care per case. CONCLUSION: Although the results are encouraging and point toward the ability of CCPs to decrease length of stay and cost of care, the evidence cannot be considered exhaustive because of the studies' inability to account for temporal trends. Further controlled studies are recommended to validate the benefits of CCPs.
Authors: Laura W J Baijens; Margaret Walshe; Leena-Maija Aaltonen; Christoph Arens; Reinie Cordier; Patrick Cras; Lise Crevier-Buchman; Chris Curtis; Wojciech Golusinski; Roganie Govender; Jesper Grau Eriksen; Kevin Hansen; Kate Heathcote; Markus M Hess; Sefik Hosal; Jens Peter Klussmann; C René Leemans; Denise MacCarthy; Beatrice Manduchi; Jean-Paul Marie; Reza Nouraei; Claire Parkes; Christina Pflug; Walmari Pilz; Julie Regan; Nathalie Rommel; Antonio Schindler; Annemie M W J Schols; Renee Speyer; Giovanni Succo; Irene Wessel; Anna C H Willemsen; Taner Yilmaz; Pere Clavé Journal: Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Date: 2020-12-19 Impact factor: 2.503
Authors: Laura B Moroney; Elizabeth C Ward; Jennifer Helios; Jane Crombie; Clare L Burns; Claire Blake; Tracy Comans; Benjamin Chua; Lizbeth Kenny; Brett G M Hughes Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2019-07-27 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Joseph C Dort; Khara M Sauro; Shamir Chandarana; Christiaan Schrag; Jennifer Matthews; Steven Nakoneshny; Vida Manoloto; Tanya Miller; C David McKenzie; Robert D Hart; T Wayne Matthews Journal: J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Date: 2020-06-23
Authors: Joseph C Dort; Khara M Sauro; Christiaan Schrag; Shamir Chandarana; Jennifer Matthews; Steven Nakoneshny; Vida Manoloto; Tanya Miller; C David McKenzie; Robert D Hart; T Wayne Matthews Journal: J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Date: 2020-06-23