Marc Nicolai Busche1, Anne Roettger, Christian Herold, Peter Maria Vogt, Hans-Oliver Rennekampff. 1. From the *Department of Plastic and Aesthetic Surgery, Burn Surgery, Klinikum Leverkusen, Leverkusen; †Department of Urology, KRH Klinikum Großburgwedel, Burgwedel; ‡Department of Aesthetic and Plastic Surgery, Sana Klinikum Hameln Pyrmont, Hameln; and §Department of Plastic, Hand, and Reconstructive Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Increased evaporative water loss (EWL) in burn patients leads to dehydration and hypothermia. Early clinical studies performed with outdated hygrometers suggested a 17 to 75 times increased EWL in burns with contradicting results for the different burn depths.Our study proposals were: (1) obtain reliable data of the EWL of all burn depths, (2) compare these results with findings from earlier studies, (3) evaluate the usefulness of the EWL in differentiating between superficial and deep partial thickness burns, (4) determine the effect of Biobrane on the EWL of superficial partial thickness burns in vivo, and (5) evaluate the effect of the sterile incision foil Opraflex on the EWL in split skin graft donor sites. METHODS: We measured the EWL of all burn depths in 28 patients under stable and recorded conditions regarding room temperature and humidity with a modern digital evaporimeter (Tewameter TM 300). For the first time in vivo, we also determined the effect of Biobrane on the EWL of burns and evaluated the EWL in split skin graft donor sites covered with Opraflex. RESULTS: The EWL in all burn depths was significantly increased (P < 0.001) compared with unburned skin. There was no significant difference (P > 0.05) in the EWL of superficial compared with deep partial thickness burns, whereas full thickness burns had a significantly lower EWL (P < 0.05) compared with superficial and deep partial thickness burns. Biobrane significantly reduced the EWL (P < 0.05) of superficial partial thickness burns. The EWL of Opraflex covered skin graft donor sites was significantly reduced compared with uncovered donor sites (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that the actual EWL in burns is approximately 3 times higher in full thickness burns and approximately 4 times higher in superficial and deep partial thickness burns compared with normal skin and therefore much lower than suggested previously.Because there was no significant difference in the EWL of superficial compared with deep partial thickness burns, the EWL cannot be used to differentiate between these burn depths.Biosynthetic wound dressings can significantly reduce the EWL of superficial partial thickness burns and sterile incision foil protects split skin graft donor sites from an increased EWL.
INTRODUCTION: Increased evaporative water loss (EWL) in burn patients leads to dehydration and hypothermia. Early clinical studies performed with outdated hygrometers suggested a 17 to 75 times increased EWL in burns with contradicting results for the different burn depths.Our study proposals were: (1) obtain reliable data of the EWL of all burn depths, (2) compare these results with findings from earlier studies, (3) evaluate the usefulness of the EWL in differentiating between superficial and deep partial thickness burns, (4) determine the effect of Biobrane on the EWL of superficial partial thickness burns in vivo, and (5) evaluate the effect of the sterile incision foil Opraflex on the EWL in split skin graft donor sites. METHODS: We measured the EWL of all burn depths in 28 patients under stable and recorded conditions regarding room temperature and humidity with a modern digital evaporimeter (Tewameter TM 300). For the first time in vivo, we also determined the effect of Biobrane on the EWL of burns and evaluated the EWL in split skin graft donor sites covered with Opraflex. RESULTS: The EWL in all burn depths was significantly increased (P < 0.001) compared with unburned skin. There was no significant difference (P > 0.05) in the EWL of superficial compared with deep partial thickness burns, whereas full thickness burns had a significantly lower EWL (P < 0.05) compared with superficial and deep partial thickness burns. Biobrane significantly reduced the EWL (P < 0.05) of superficial partial thickness burns. The EWL of Opraflex covered skin graft donor sites was significantly reduced compared with uncovered donor sites (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that the actual EWL in burns is approximately 3 times higher in full thickness burns and approximately 4 times higher in superficial and deep partial thickness burns compared with normal skin and therefore much lower than suggested previously.Because there was no significant difference in the EWL of superficial compared with deep partial thickness burns, the EWL cannot be used to differentiate between these burn depths.Biosynthetic wound dressings can significantly reduce the EWL of superficial partial thickness burns and sterile incision foil protects split skin graft donor sites from an increased EWL.
Authors: Christian Sommerhalder; Elizabeth Blears; Andrew J Murton; Craig Porter; Celeste Finnerty; David N Herndon Journal: Curr Probl Surg Date: 2019-11-11 Impact factor: 1.909
Authors: Jennifer Lynn Schiefer; Janine Andreae; Paul Christian Fuchs; Rolf Lefering; Paul Immanuel Heidekrueger; Alexandra Schulz; Mahsa Bagheri Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2022-05-18 Impact factor: 4.964
Authors: Marcos T Tanita; Meriele M Capeletti; Tomás A Moreira; Renan P Petinelli; Lucienne T Q Cardoso; Cintia M C Grion Journal: Int J Burns Trauma Date: 2020-02-15
Authors: Viktoria Mertin; Patrick Most; Martin Busch; Stefan Trojan; Christian Tapking; Valentin Haug; Ulrich Kneser; Gabriel Hundeshagen Journal: Burns Trauma Date: 2022-09-23