Literature DB >> 27387433

Should charge variants of monoclonal antibody therapeutics be considered critical quality attributes?

Sumit Kumar Singh1, Gunjan Narula1, Anurag S Rathore2.   

Abstract

Charge variants, namely acidic and basic variants, are typically found in mAb therapeutics. Charge heterogeneity is typically not regarded to affect safety and efficacy of the product. As a result, the commonly followed approach involves assignment of a specification for the variants based on statistical analysis of variability in levels that is seen during commercial manufacturing. This is followed by monitoring of product quality to demonstrate consistency. This paper aims to demonstrate that this perception of charge variants warrants a more in-depth investigation to evaluate the role charge variants play in safety and efficacy of a mAb therapeutic. In addition, a novel procedure has been suggested for making this assessment and alleviate the problems that are traditionally faced when isolating these variants for characterization. The suggested procedure utilizes the principles of bioseparations, cell biology, and statistics and it is demonstrated that this is significantly more efficient than the approach practiced today.
© 2016 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim.

Keywords:  Cell-based assay; Charge variants; Critical quality attributes; Monoclonal antibodies; Statistical modeling

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27387433     DOI: 10.1002/elps.201600078

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Electrophoresis        ISSN: 0173-0835            Impact factor:   3.535


  8 in total

1.  Assessment of structural and functional similarity of biosimilar products: Rituximab as a case study.

Authors:  Neh Nupur; Nidhi Chhabra; Rozaleen Dash; Anurag S Rathore
Journal:  MAbs       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 5.857

2.  Determination of Critical Quality Attributes for a Biotherapeutic in the QbD Paradigm: GCSF as a Case Study.

Authors:  Sumit K Singh; Deepak Kumar; Anurag S Rathore
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 4.009

3.  Comparative analytical profiling of bevacizumab biosimilars marketed in India: a national control laboratory study.

Authors:  Anu Prakash; Nripendra N Mishra; Utpreksha Vaish; Sonia Sharma; Apoorva Anand; Richi V Mahajan; J P Prasad; Subhash Chand
Journal:  3 Biotech       Date:  2020-11-09       Impact factor: 2.406

4.  Impact of linker-drug on ion exchange chromatography separation of antibody-drug conjugates.

Authors:  Zhaorui Zhang; Shiyue Zhou; Linjie Han; Qunying Zhang; Wayne A Pritts
Journal:  MAbs       Date:  2019-06-25       Impact factor: 5.857

5.  Impact of mammalian cell culture conditions on monoclonal antibody charge heterogeneity: an accessory monitoring tool for process development.

Authors:  Bernhard Sissolak; Nico Lingg; Wolfgang Sommeregger; Gerald Striedner; Karola Vorauer-Uhl
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2019-06-07       Impact factor: 3.346

6.  LC-MS based case-by-case analysis of the impact of acidic and basic charge variants of bevacizumab on stability and biological activity.

Authors:  Sumit Kumar Singh; Deepak Kumar; Himanshu Malani; Anurag S Rathore
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-29       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Exploring the limits of conventional small-scale CHO fed-batch for accelerated on demand monoclonal antibody production.

Authors:  Amélie Mahé; Alexandra Martiné; Séverine Fagète; Pierre-Alain Girod
Journal:  Bioprocess Biosyst Eng       Date:  2021-11-09       Impact factor: 3.210

Review 8.  Analytical Similarity Assessment of Biosimilars: Global Regulatory Landscape, Recent Studies and Major Advancements in Orthogonal Platforms.

Authors:  Neh Nupur; Srishti Joshi; Davy Gulliarme; Anurag S Rathore
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-02-09
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.