The four-way (Holliday) DNA junction of homologous recombination is processed by the symmetrical cleavage of two strands by a nuclease. These junction-resolving enzymes bind to four-way junctions in dimeric form, distorting the structure of the junction in the process. Crystal structures of T7 endonuclease I have been determined as free protein, and the complex with a DNA junction. In neither crystal structure was the N-terminal 16-amino acid peptide visible, yet deletion of this peptide has a marked effect on the resolution process. Here we have investigated the N-terminal peptide by inclusion of spin-label probes at unique sites within this region, studied by electron paramagnetic resonance. Continuous wave experiments show that these labels are mobile in the free protein but become constrained on binding a DNA junction, with the main interaction occurring for residues 7-10 and 12. Distance measurements between equivalent positions within the two peptides of a dimer using PELDOR showed that the intermonomeric distances for residues 2-12 are long and broadly distributed in the free protein but are significantly shortened and become more defined on binding to DNA. These results suggest that the N-terminal peptides become more organized on binding to the DNA junction and nestle into the minor grooves at the branchpoint, consistent with the biochemical data indicating an important role in the resolution process. This study demonstrates the presence of structure within a protein region that cannot be viewed by crystallography.
The four-way (Holliday) DNA junction of homologous recombination is processed by the symmetrical cleavage of two strands by a nuclease. These junction-resolving enzymes bind to four-way junctions in dimeric form, distorting the structure of the junction in the process. Crystal structures of T7 endonuclease I have been determined as free protein, and the complex with a DNA junction. In neither crystal structure was the N-terminal 16-amino acid peptide visible, yet deletion of this peptide has a marked effect on the resolution process. Here we have investigated the N-terminal peptide by inclusion of spin-label probes at unique sites within this region, studied by electron paramagnetic resonance. Continuous wave experiments show that these labels are mobile in the free protein but become constrained on binding a DNA junction, with the main interaction occurring for residues 7-10 and 12. Distance measurements between equivalent positions within the two peptides of a dimer using PELDOR showed that the intermonomeric distances for residues 2-12 are long and broadly distributed in the free protein but are significantly shortened and become more defined on binding to DNA. These results suggest that the N-terminal peptides become more organized on binding to the DNA junction and nestle into the minor grooves at the branchpoint, consistent with the biochemical data indicating an important role in the resolution process. This study demonstrates the presence of structure within a protein region that cannot be viewed by crystallography.
The DNA four-way
(Holliday)
junction is an essential intermediary structure in homologous recombination.[1−3] This process is important in repair of double-strand breaks in DNA,
and in meiosis in eukaryotes. Resolution into unconnected duplex species
requires recognition and cleavage of the four-way DNA junction in
a structure-selective and concerted manner.[4] Phage T7 endonuclease I is a strongly associated homodimer comprising
149 amino acids per monomer.[5−7] The protein binds DNA four-way
junctions with a dissociation constant of ∼1 nM.[8] Although the enzyme is selective for the structure
of the junction (with a very weak sequence preference), the DNA structure
is significantly altered on binding. Endonuclease I introduces two
diametrically symmetrical cleavages to generate a productive resolution.
The cleavages are sequential, rather than simultaneous, and yet concerted.[9] As a class, the junction-resolving enzymes generally
ensure bilateral cleavages occur within the lifetime of the complex
by acceleration of second-strand cleavage,[10−12] probably as
a consequence of the structural distortion imposed.Several
crystallographic studies have defined the basic structures
of endonuclease I in isolation[13,14] and in complex with
a small four-way DNA junction.[15] There
is limited flexibility in the endonuclease I dimer, and only a small
conformational change takes place on binding to a four-way DNA junction.[15,16] Residues from both polypeptides contribute to each active site of
endonuclease I (Asp55, Glu55, and Lys67 from monomer A and Glu20 from
monomer B), and two metal ions are present in each.[17] The DNA–protein complex is held together by a combination
of interactions with basic residues of the protein and also direct
contacts between the DNA backbone and the active site metal ions.[17] There are two 30 Å long mutually perpendicular
channels within the protein dimer, to which both polypeptides contribute.
These are each occupied by coaxially aligned pairs of helical arms
of the junction, thus explaining the selectivity of the enzyme for
a junction that can adopt that disposition of helices, as observed
in solution studies.[18]Biochemical
studies have defined an important role for the 16 N-terminal
amino acids of endonuclease I.[19] Deletion
of the N-termini led to increased affinity of binding, but a slower
rate of cleavage. Spectroscopic study indicated that these peptides
are involved in an opening of the DNA structure at the center of the
junction, and that their deletion resulted in substantially lowered
bilateral cleavage. These results indicate a key role for the N-termini
in the function of the enzyme, stabilizing the transition state and
destabilizing the ground state. However, the N-terminal peptides could
not be located within the electron density maps of either free or
DNA-bound endonuclease I.[13,15] This presents a conundrum
because the N-termini clearly play an important functional role but
are not localized within the structure in the ground state.In an effort to resolve this apparent contradiction, we have used
site-directed spin labeling (SDSL),[20] continuous
wave (CW) electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR),[21] and pulsed electron–electron double resonance (PELDOR)
EPR[22,23] experiments to probe the environment and
structural relationships of these amino acids more closely. We have
constructed full-length endonuclease I single-point variants containing
cysteine residues at positions 2, 6–10, 12, 14, 16, and 29
(Figure ). The choice
of positions to label was made to provide alternate residue coverage
over the N-terminal region with emphasis on the region between residues
6 and 16. Initially, the rational was to avoid mutating large hydrophobic
residues such as F15. Some extra sites were added later to provide
greater coverage. Covalent attachment of the spin-label (1-oxyl-2,2,5,5-tetramethylpyrroline-3-methyl)
methanethiosulfonate (MTSSL) at the sulfhydryl groups of these unique
cysteine residues has allowed us to introduce the spin-label (R1)
and to analyze the structure and dynamics of the N-terminal region
using EPR.
Figure 1
Known structure of endonuclease I (separate monomers shown as red
and green cartoons). The DNA junction is shown as a gray surface.
The structurally undetermined N-terminal sequence (residues 1–16)
and the first helix (gray shading) with numbers indicating the positions
studied by spin labeling. Residues 16 and 29 are indicated, for guidance,
with arrows.
Known structure of endonuclease I (separate monomers shown as red
and green cartoons). The DNA junction is shown as a gray surface.
The structurally undetermined N-terminal sequence (residues 1–16)
and the first helix (gray shading) with numbers indicating the positions
studied by spin labeling. Residues 16 and 29 are indicated, for guidance,
with arrows.The shape of the CW nitroxide
spectra recorded for the uniquely
labeled sites depends on a number of factors, one of which is the
dynamics of the label. Under suitable conditions, analysis of the
shape of the spectrum can reveal the dynamic state of the spin-label,
up to and including states in which the nitroxide is effectively immobile
as a result of direct interaction with structured components of either
the DNA junction or the protein. PELDOR can be used to measure long-range
distances between unpaired electrons, in the range of 20–120
Å[24]or longer. Because endonuclease
I forms a symmetrical dimer, single spin-labels attached to unique
positions on the monomer produce a symmetrical pair of label sites
within the dimer. The data obtained from both CW and PELDOR experiments
indicate that the N-terminus is mobile in the free protein but becomes
structured upon binding to the DNA junction.
Experimental Procedures
Preparation
of Endonuclease I
Site-directed mutagenesis
of the N-terminal residues into cysteines was performed by polymerase
chain reaction on the gene encoding endonuclease I, cloned in expression
vector pET19-endoI using the QuickChange procedure (Stratagene). In
each case, pairs of complementary mutagenic oligonucleotides were
annealed to the double-stranded plasmid and then fully resynthesized
with the Pfu polymerase. The parental DNA was removed
by digestion with the methylation-sensitive restriction enzyme DpnI, and the newly synthesized mutant plasmid was transformed
into Escherichia coli. Each plasmid DNA was purified
and sequenced before expression.Endonuclease I was expressed
in E. coli BL21(DE3)pLysS at 37 °C and grown
to an absorbance A600 of 0.6, using plasmid
pET19endo I prepared as described previously.[14] After induction with 0.1 mM isopropyl β-d-1-thiogalactopyranoside
and further incubation at 30 °C for 4 h, the cells were harvested
by centrifugation. Cells were resuspended in 5 volumes of PS buffer
[50 mM sodium phosphate (pH 8) and 1 M NaCl] supplemented with the
complete protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche) and lysed by sonication.
The lysates were cleared by centrifugation at 45000g for 30 min and applied to a nickel-loaded HisTrap HP column (GE
Healthcare). The N-terminal oligo-histidine-tagged protein was eluted
using a 10 to 500 mM imidazole gradient in PS buffer. The histidine
tag was removed from endonuclease I by digestion with TEV protease.
The pure protein was extensively dialyzed against 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH
8), 100 mM NaCl, and 1 mM dithiothreitol. Protein concentrations were
measured optically, using an absorption coefficient of 49500 M–1 cm–1 at 280 nm for a dimer of endonuclease
I.Before labeling, the cysteine residues were fully reduced
by adding
20 mM dithiothreitol to the protein sample, and the excess reducing
agent was removed by anion exchange chromatography on Sephadex SP
(GE Healthcare). The proteins were reacted with a 10-fold excess of
MTSSL at a protein concentration of 20–100 μM dimer for
1 h at 4 °C. Unreacted MTSSL was removed by dialysis against
water, and protein samples were lyophilized prior to use. Derivatization
of endonuclease I by MTSSL was verified by measurement of the increase
in molecular mass using mass spectroscopy.
DNA Synthesis
Oligodeoxynucleotides were synthesized
by phosphoramidite chemistry on a 394 DNA/RNA synthesizer (Applied
Biosystems).[25,26] Fully deprotected oligonucleotides
were purified by gel electrophoresis in polyacrylamide gels [10–20%
(w/v)] in 90 mM Tris-borate (pH 8.5) and 2 mM EDTA (TBE buffer) containing
8 M urea and recovered by electroelution and ethanol precipitation.
Four-way junctions were assembled by mixing stoichiometric quantities
of four strands and annealed by incubation in 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8)
and 50 mM NaCl for 5 min at 85 °C, followed by slow cooling.
DNA junctions were purified by gel electrophoresis in polyacrylamide
under nondenaturing conditions and eluted from excised gel fragments
by diffusion into buffer. The DNA was ethanol precipitated before
being resuspended in D2O.
Preparation of EPR Samples
For PELDOR experiments,
spin-labeled, lyophilized protein was resuspended in 50 μL of
D2O containing 20 mM HEPES (pH 7.5) buffer, 100 mM NaCl,
and 20 mM CaCl2 (note the use of Ca2+ ions rather
than Mg2+ ions leads to proteins that are structurally
stable but catalytically inactive) and then diluted with an equal
volume of d8-glycerol (50 μL) to
produce a final volume of 100 μL. Samples typically had concentrations
of 100 μM. When required, DNA junction was added as a concentrated
solution in D2O directly to the protein, prior to the addition
of glycerol. Samples for CW spectroscopy were prepared in the same
buffer and at the same concentration as PELDOR samples but without
deuteration and with the addition of Ficol 70 to a concentration of
25% to increase sample viscosity.[27]
PELDOR
Experiments
Experiments were performed using
a Bruker ELEXSYS E580 spectrometer operating at X-band with a dielectric
ring resonator and a Bruker 400U second microwave source unit. All
measurements were taken at 50 K with an overcoupled resonator giving
a Q factor of <100. The video bandwidth was set
to 20 MHz. The four-pulse, dead-time free PELDOR sequence was used,
with the pump pulse frequency positioned at the center of the nitroxide
spectrum. The frequency of the observer pulses was incremented, by
80 MHz relative to the pump position. The observer sequence used a
32 ns π-pulse; the pump π/2-pulse was typically 16 ns.
The experiment repetition time was 4 μs, and the number of shots
at each time point was 50. The number of time points and the number
of scans used were varied for each sample, but sufficient data were
collected to obtain an acceptable signal-to-noise ratio.
PELDOR Data
Analysis
Data were analyzed using the DeerAnalysis
2006 software package.[28] In brief, the
dipolar coupling evolution data were corrected for background echo
decay using a homogeneous three-dimensional spin distribution. The
starting time for the background fit was optimized to give the best-fit
Pake pattern in the Fourier-transformed data and the lowest root-mean-square
deviation background fit. Tikhonov regularization was used to derive
distance distributions P(r).
CW EPR
Experiments
Continuous wave (CW) EPR was performed
at X-band with a constant frequency of 9.876 GHz. Spectra were recorded
on a Bruker EMX spectrometer working at X-band using a super-high-sensitivity
probe head (Bruker ER4122SHQE resonator). CW EPR was performed in
a critically coupled resonator with a typical Q factor
of 7000. Data were collected over a magnetic field range of 100 G
centered at 3519.1 G using a constant microwave frequency of 9.876
GHz. Background noise was averaged out over 10 sweeps at a power of
10 mW, and spectra were normalized so their central peaks were all
equivalent.
Results and Discussion
Comparative Spin-Label
Dynamics Revealed by CW EPR
The CW EPR traces of the R1 spin-label
attached at various positions
on the N-terminus of endonuclease I are shown in Figure . Experiments were conducted
on free protein or that bound to a DNA four-way junction (S2). Initial
examination of the CW spectra revealed significant differences between
DNA-bound and unbound states, at most sites in the N-terminus of endonuclease
I.
Figure 2
CW spectra recorded on endonuclease I, with spin-labels attached
at positions 2, 6–10, 12, 14, 16, and 29: (left column) bound
to DNA junction and (right column) free protein. Positions 3489G and
3559G are indicated with dashed lines.
CW spectra recorded on endonuclease I, with spin-labels attached
at positions 2, 6–10, 12, 14, 16, and 29: (left column) bound
to DNA junction and (right column) free protein. Positions 3489G and
3559G are indicated with dashed lines.The most obvious differences between free protein and that
which
is DNA-bound include a considerable broadening of the lines on going
from the unbound to the DNA-bound state and the appearance of a new
peak at low field (3489G) and a smaller high-field peak (3559G). The
broadening effect is indicative of a decrease in the level of dynamic
motion of the spin-label (τ ∼ 5 ns) upon binding to the
DNA junction. The appearance of the extreme low-field and high-field
peaks indicates that the environment of the spin-label results in
at least some of the label population becoming relatively immobilized,
such that its dynamic properties are those of the overall tumbling
of the complex (τ > 50 ns). Attempts to fit the CW spectra
using
EasySpin[29] were unsuccessful, and a reasonable
interpretation could be that the nitroxide spectra are strongly multicomponent.The analysis of mobility from CW spectra can be complicated by
the presence of multiple conformational forms. The data shown in Figure provide some indication
of the proportion of the immobile form of the spin-label in the N-terminal
region, when the endonuclease I is bound to a DNA junction, probably
indicating the proximity of the spin-labels to the DNA. The absence
of the corresponding peaks in the spectra of unbound endonuclease
I also illustrates the disordered nature of the N-terminal region
in the absence of DNA. Because the CW spectra are reporting on the
dynamics of spin-labels that are undoubtedly structurally heterogeneous,
the interpretation of an individual spectral characteristic can be
misleading; however, qualitative comparison between the DNA-bound
and the free forms strongly indicates that the N-terminal region of
the protein is highly mobile in the absence of DNA binding and becomes
less mobile when bound to DNA, with a portion being very immobile.
As indicated by the PELDOR measurements, discussed in the next section,
the spin-labels at the extreme N-terminus are very close to each other
within the protein dimer. The CW spectra of the DNA-bound complex
are all significantly broadened relative to those of the non-DNA-bound
form, indicating a relatively slow motion, within at least some of
the conformations. It is possible that the extreme N-terminal spin-labels
could be close enough to be broadened by dipolar coupling and so could
be more mobile than the CW spectra might imply. The presence of a
low-field peak in these spectra does, however, suggest that some proportion
of the N-terminus is essentially immobile, making it likely that extreme
N-terminal labels are indeed exist in either a slow or very slow motional
regime.
Figure 3
Graph showing the relative intensity of the low-field peak (corresponding
to an immobilized spin-label) in normalized spectra, as a function
of sequence position in the N-terminal peptide in endonuclease I bound
to the DNA junction.
Graph showing the relative intensity of the low-field peak (corresponding
to an immobilized spin-label) in normalized spectra, as a function
of sequence position in the N-terminal peptide in endonuclease I bound
to the DNA junction.
Distance Measurement by PELDOR
Using the same spin-labeled
species that were previously analyzed by CW EPR, we have measured
the distance between the two labels within the dimeric complex of
endonuclease I using the PELDOR experiment, which exploits the distance
dependence of dipolar coupling between spin-labels.[30−32] When spin-labels
are held in structurally homogeneous positions and the background
signal is removed, the spin echo of the PELDOR pulse sequence exhibits
oscillation revealing the dipolar coupling frequency, which can yield
the distance distribution between labels. If underlying structures
are less well-defined, with some level of structural heterogeneity,
the dipolar oscillations will be subject to a degree of interference
and cancellation, leading to a damping of the echo oscillation, thus
rendering the determination of accurate distance (or distance distribution)
problematic. Initial decay of the PELDOR signal reveals an average
spin–spin distance relationship even in the absence of a persistent
measurable echo oscillation. Labels at positions 12, 14, and 16 gave
PELDOR signals with observable oscillations. PELDOR data for all other
label positions were largely free of oscillation, after the initial
decay. All baseline-corrected data were transformed to distance distributions
using Tikhonov regularization within DeerAnalysis (Figure ). Distance distributions from
data that are essentially free of oscillations should be interpreted
with care; however, comparison across all label positions is instructive
as is the average distance measurement that can be made from the initial
slope in the baseline-corrected data (Table and Figure ).
Figure 4
PELDOR data and derived distance distributions for spin-labeled
endonuclease I in the presence (red) and absence (black) of a bound
DNA junction. (A) Background-corrected data and (B) distance distributions
calculated using Tikhonov regularization. Axes for background-corrected
data are normalized intensity, and for the distributions, axes are P(r), the distance probability.
Table 1
Distances Derived from the PELDOR
Dataa
amino acid position
distance without DNA (nm)
distance with
DNA (nm)
2
5.6
2.7
6
5.8
2.8
7
5.6
2.6
8
6.1
2.3
9
5.9
2.8
10
5.6
3.2
12
5.6
4.5
14
4.5
5.9
16
5.8
4.9
The values shown
are the average
values derived from the initial slopes of the background-corrected
PELDOR data.
Figure 5
Plot of the estimated
spin–spin distance as a function of
the position of the spin-labels in the protein sequence. Distances
calculated in the absence of bound DNA (—, ●) and in
the presence of bound DNA (---, ○).
PELDOR data and derived distance distributions for spin-labeled
endonuclease I in the presence (red) and absence (black) of a bound
DNA junction. (A) Background-corrected data and (B) distance distributions
calculated using Tikhonov regularization. Axes for background-corrected
data are normalized intensity, and for the distributions, axes are P(r), the distance probability.The values shown
are the average
values derived from the initial slopes of the background-corrected
PELDOR data.Plot of the estimated
spin–spin distance as a function of
the position of the spin-labels in the protein sequence. Distances
calculated in the absence of bound DNA (—, ●) and in
the presence of bound DNA (---, ○).The PELDOR-derived distances clearly exhibit significant
differences
between DNA-bound and unbound forms of the protein. In the absence
of bound DNA, data from spin-labels, up to and including position
12, show very long distances with extremely broad distributions, consistent
with a largely disordered structure.[33] Binding
to the DNA junction causes the spin–spin distances to be shortened
significantly, with the distance between labels being reduced from
position 14 to position 8 and then leveling off at distances of <25
Å. The distance distributions for the DNA-bound forms are still
broad, although from position 8 onward the distributions become sharper
with positions 14 and 16 being much better defined.In the X-ray
diffraction-determined structure [Protein Data Bank
(PDB) entry 2PFJ] of the DNA-bound protein, the N-terminal helices from residue 29
to 17 are directed toward each other underneath the bound DNA junction.
Residues from position 17 to 1 did not show sufficient electron density
to define structure. The CW and PELDOR data both indicate that, in
the absence of bound DNA, the N-terminal residues before residue 16
are highly mobile and structurally disordered. The data from the DNA-bound
complex indicate a much less mobile condition for the 12 N-terminal
residues. The presence of peaks in the CW spectra (of the DNA-bound
form) at around 3489G indicates a degree of immobility probably due
to direct contact by the spin-labels in the N-terminal region with
the DNA. The 3489G peak is present in all CW spectra derived from
the protein–DNA complex and absent in all CW spectra taken
of the protein alone (except residue 16) (Figure ). Comparison of the CW spectra, between
DNA-bound and nonbound constructs, implies a general decrease in the
mobility of the DNA-bound forms as judged by the broadening of the
lines; however, the inferred decrease in mobility is uneven through
the N-terminal sequence with the mobility of residues at positions
2 and 6 approaching that of the non-DNA-bound form while still exhibiting
a peak at 3489G, indicating that some portion of the spin-label is
relatively immobile.The distances taken from the PELDOR experiments
indicate a generally
decreasing distance between the symmetry-related spin-labels as one
moves from residue 14 to 8. From residue 8 to 2, the distance between
spin-labels changes very little, around a value of ∼2.5 Å.Structural conclusions from the described EPR data are bound to
be somewhat speculative; however, we can suggest that given the presence
of immobile spin-label species within the N-terminal sequence (in
the DNA-bound complex) and the range of distance distributions observed
between symmetrically located spin-labels, the N-terminal region under
these conditions must be taking on a more compact and less dynamic
structure than when in the non-DNA-bound state. The restraints imposed
by the structure of the bound DNA, the CW spectra, and the distance
measurements made from PELDOR suggest that the N-terminal peptides
extend from the last crystallographically determined residue, R16,
into the widened minor grooves at the center of the DNA junction (Figure ). Because the distance
measurements show a crossing of the dimerically related N-terminal
regions (Figure ),
with the distances from PELDOR evening out at approximately 2.6–2.8
Å for residues below position 8, and because the pattern of dynamic
changes was observed in the CW spectra, it can be suggested that the
peptides must adopt a somewhat compact structure pointing in toward
the protein’s dyad axis. The dimensions of the DNA surface
into which this N-terminal region is pointing could accommodate a
helical structure, although the data do not provide the resolution
to predict this with great certainty.
Figure 6
Two views of the endonuclease I dimer
(magenta cartoon representation
with crystallographically determined helices and strands) bound to
a four-way DNA junction (gray surface representation) (PDB entry 2PFJ). A putative position
for the 16 N-terminal residues is shown crossing the underside of
the junction (green cylinder).
Two views of the endonuclease I dimer
(magenta cartoon representation
with crystallographically determined helices and strands) bound to
a four-way DNA junction (gray surface representation) (PDB entry 2PFJ). A putative position
for the 16 N-terminal residues is shown crossing the underside of
the junction (green cylinder).The total deletion of the N-terminus of endonuclease I has
previously
been shown to have a marked effect on several structural and functional
features.[19] Binding between the protein
and the DNA becomes stronger, and cleavage becomes slower. A large
change in activation energy is measured, and although the overall
shape of the complex remains unaffected, it was noticed that there
was an almost total suppression of the 2-aminopurine fluorescence
enhancement normally observed, resulting from the opening of the center
of the DNA junction. The most striking change observed is perhaps
the switch from bilateral to unilateral DNA cleavage in supercoiled
substrate. This may be explained by the slower cleavage rate or may
be due to more subtle changes in the reaction trajectory.All
crystallographically studied junction-resolving enzymes present
a large, 2-fold symmetrical, basic surface, which is expected to bind
the four-way junction. Apart from endonuclease I, these surfaces all
present some protruding structural elements at the dyad axis of the
dimer that are expected to be inserted into the center of the junction
upon binding.[4] This has been confirmed
in all cocrystal structures to date, with α-helices and adjacent
loops playing this role in T4 endonuclease VII,[34] RuvC,[35] and GEN1.[36] These domains are often disordered and expected
to be dynamic in the free protein, but they may become more ordered
upon substrate binding. In this context, our results suggest that
the N-terminus of endonuclease I plays a similar role by inserting
into the minor grooves at the branchpoint. However, endonuclease I
is unique in that it wraps around the center of the junction and the
N-termini bind the other face of the substrate rather than forming
a protrusion in the main DNA-binding surface.In conclusion,
we have observed the disordered nature of the N-terminal
region of endonuclease I in the absence of a bound DNA junction and
the formation of structure within those residues upon binding to a
DNA junction. The structure formed does not appear to be ordered enough
to give interpretable electron density from X-ray diffraction but
is ordered enough to show significant changes in the CW spectra of
site specifically labeled positions in the N-terminal region and also
to give more defined and shorter distance distributions in PELDOR
experiments. On the basis of the constraints imposed by the distance
measurements and the symmetrical nature of the structure, we propose
that the N-terminal region must form a structure that is inserted
into the minor groove at the junction branchpoint and play a key role
in its opening.
Authors: Artur P Kaczmarczyk; Anne-Cécile Déclais; Matthew D Newton; Simon J Boulton; David M J Lilley; David S Rueda Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2022-10-07 Impact factor: 17.694