| Literature DB >> 27386515 |
Young K Jin1, Petra Lundgren2, Adrian Lutz3, Jean-Baptiste Raina4, Emily J Howells5, Allison S Paley1, Bette L Willis6, Madeleine J H van Oppen7.
Abstract
The current lack of understanding of the genetic basis underlying environmental stress tolerance in reef-building corals impairs the development of new management approaches to confronting the global demise of coral reefs. On the Great Barrier Reef (GBR), an approximately 51% decline in coral cover occurred over the period 1985-2012. We conducted a gene-by-environment association analysis across 12° latitude on the GBR, as well as both in situ and laboratory genotype-by-phenotype association analyses. These analyses allowed us to identify alleles at two genetic loci that account for differences in environmental stress tolerance and antioxidant capacity in the common coral Acropora millepora. The effect size for antioxidant capacity was considerable and biologically relevant (32.5 and 14.6% for the two loci). Antioxidant capacity is a critical component of stress tolerance because a multitude of environmental stressors cause increased cellular levels of reactive oxygen species. Our findings provide the first step toward the development of novel coral reef management approaches, such as spatial mapping of stress tolerance for use in marine protected area design, identification of stress-tolerant colonies for assisted migration, and marker-assisted selective breeding to create more tolerant genotypes for restoration of denuded reefs.Entities:
Keywords: Assisted Evolution; Coral; QTL; antioxidant capacity; climate change; coral reef restoration
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27386515 PMCID: PMC4928996 DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.1500842
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Adv ISSN: 2375-2548 Impact factor: 14.136
Fig. 1Gene-by-environment associations.
(A) Map showing mean SST and range in SST, nitrate gradients, and locations of 25 populations of A. millepora sampled on the GBR. (B) Correlation coefficients (ρ) between environmental gradients and allele frequencies. SNP alleles in brackets were used for the analysis. *P = 0.05 to 0.1; **P < 0.05.
Fig. 2Genotype-by-phenotype associations.
(A) Relationships between bleaching responses observed in 2006 (N = 150 coral colonies) and 2009 (N = 165 coral colonies) and allele frequencies at C70S236 (corrected P = 0.0469) and C29226S281 (corrected P = 0.0092) markers. Frequencies of G and T are shown for C29226S281 and C70S236 markers, respectively. (B) Photos showing nonbleached (top) and bleached (bottom) corals. (C) The relationships between CoQH2 and genotypes (N = 8 coral colonies). P = 0.0096 (27°C) and P = 0.0013 (32°C) for C29226S281; P = 0.0014 (27°C) and P < 0.0001 (32°C) for C70S236.
Summary of results.
Main results from the three independent data sets obtained in this study.
| Gene-by-environment correlation (poor water | Higher frequency of T allele | Higher frequency of G allele |
| 2006 nonbleached versus bleached corals | 12% higher frequency of T allele in | No difference |
| 2009 nonbleached versus bleached corals | No difference | 28% higher frequency of G allele in |
| Experimental heat stress | Higher antioxidant capacity (CoQH2) in TT genotypes: | Higher antioxidant capacity (CoQH2) in GG genotypes: |
| Resistance to photosynthetic |