| Literature DB >> 27386359 |
Seung-Min Shin1, Eun Joo Choi2, Seong-Yong Moon1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Prevalence of cysts and tumors related to impacted third molars has been considered important because the risk justifies prophylactic extraction. This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the prevalence of cysts or tumors associated with impacted mandibular third molars (IMTMs) according to patients' age and gender.Entities:
Keywords: Ameloblastoma; Dentigerous cyst; Impacted third molar; Pathological lesion; Surgical extraction
Year: 2016 PMID: 27386359 PMCID: PMC4927556 DOI: 10.1186/s40064-016-2640-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Springerplus ISSN: 2193-1801
Incidence of cysts or tumors adjacent to impacted mandibular third molars according to age and gender
| Age (years) | Group A | Group B | Total | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male | Female | Total | Male | Female | Total | ||
| 10–19 | 1721 | 1635 | 3356 | 16 | 8 | 24 | 3380 |
| 20–29 | 7019 | 5628 | 12,647 | 34 | 19 | 53 | 12,700 |
| 30–39 | 1950 | 1258 | 3208 | 26 | 8 | 34 | 3242 |
| 40–49 | 747 | 282 | 1029 | 18 | 5 | 23 | 1052 |
| 50–59 | 200 | 93 | 293 | 20 | 3 | 23 | 316 |
| 60–69 | 54 | 16 | 70 | 14 | 2 | 16 | 86 |
| 70– | 13 | 10 | 23 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 26 |
| Total | 11,704 | 8922 | 20,626 | 131 | 45 | 176 | 20,802 |
Group A: patients who underwent surgical extraction of IMTMs
Group B: patients diagnosed with cysts or tumors adjacent to IMTMs who underwent surgical removal
aThe percentage is calculated to divide the patients in Group B into total patients for each age group
bThe percentage is calculated to divide the number of patients in each age group into the total number of patients
Comparison of the incidence ratio for male and female patients in Groups A and B
| Male:female (Group A) | Age (years) | Male:female (Group B) |
|---|---|---|
| 1.06:1 | 10–19 | 1.75:1 |
| 1.25:1 | 20–29 | 1.53:1 |
| 1.56:1 | 30–39 | 4:1 |
| 2.67:1 | 40–49 | 4.5:1 |
| 2.29:1 | 50–59 | 28:1 |
| 3.78:1 | 60–69 | 8:1 |
| 1.6:1 | 70– | ∞a |
| 1.32:1 | Total | 3.29:1 |
Group A: patients who underwent surgical extraction of impacted mandibular third molars with no pathologies
Group B: patients diagnosed with cysts and tumors adjacent to impacted mandibular third molars who underwent surgical removal
aThe incidence ratio is not calculated because no female patient over the age of 70 was diagnosed with cysts or tumors adjacent to impacted mandibular third molars
Histopathological findings of cysts or tumors adjacent to impacted mandibular third molars
| Age | Dentigerous cyst | Kerato-cystic odontogenic tumor | Ameloblastoma | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10–19 | 12 | 9 | 1 | 22 |
| 20–29 | 38 | 7 | 3 | 48 |
| 30–39 | 30 | 4 | 1 | 35 |
| 40–49 | 16 | 5 | 1 | 22 |
| 50–59 | 25 | 4 | 0 | 29 |
| 60–69 | 13 | 1 | 4 | 18 |
| 70– | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Total | 135 (76.7 %) | 31 (17.6 %) | 10 (5.7 %) | 176 (100 %) |
Fig. 1Well-defined pericoronal radiolucencies observed on radiographs of teeth #38 and #48 in a 50-year-old man. The lesions were later diagnosed as dentigerous cysts by histopathologic examination
Fig. 2Multilocular radiolucency extending from tooth #45 to the right ascending ramus, with impaction of tooth #48 in a 59-year-old woman. The lesion was diagnosed as a keratocysticodontogenic tumor by histopathologic examination
Fig. 3Well-defined radiolucency extending from tooth #36 to the left ascending ramus, with impaction of tooth #38 in a 19-year-old-man. The lesion was diagnosed as an ameloblastoma by histopathologic examination
Reported prevalence of cysts or tumors associated with impacted mandibular third molars
| References | Incidence (%) |
|---|---|
| Bruce et al. ( | 6.2 |
| Goldberg et al. ( | 2 |
| Nordenram et al. ( | 4.5 |
| Lysell and Rohlin ( | 3 |
| Samsudin and Mason ( | 3.3 |
| Brickley et al. ( | 3.5 |
| Güven et al. ( | 3.1 |
| Al-Khateeb and Bataineh ( | 2.6 |
| Current study (2016) | 0.864 |