| Literature DB >> 27385484 |
J Brice Weinberg1, Alicia D Volkheimer1, Matthew P Rubach1, Salvatore M Florence2, Jackson P Mukemba2, Ayam R Kalingonji2, Charles Langelier3, Youwei Chen1, Margaret Bush1, Tsin W Yeo4, Donald L Granger5, Nicholas M Anstey4, Esther D Mwaikambo2.
Abstract
We earlier established that nitric oxide (NO) is protective against severe malaria and that arginine and NO levels are reduced in malaria patients. We now show that an M2-like blood monocyte phenotype is significantly associated with hypoargininemia, NO insufficiency, and disease severity in Tanzanian children with falciparum malaria. Compared to control children (n = 106), children with moderately severe (n = 77) and severe falciparum malaria (n = 129) had significantly higher mononuclear cell arginase 1 mRNA, protein, and enzyme activity; lower NOS2 mRNA; lower plasma arginine; and higher plasma IL-10, IL-13, and IL-4. In addition, monocyte CD206 and CD163 and plasma soluble CD163 were elevated. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed a significant correlation of risk of severe malaria with both plasma IL-10 and soluble CD163 levels. Monocyte M2 skewing likely contributes to NO bioinsufficiency in falciparum malaria in children. Treatments that reverse the M2 polarization may have potential as adjunctive treatment for malaria.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27385484 PMCID: PMC4935839 DOI: 10.1038/srep29151
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Patient characteristics and laboratory data according to clinical status.
| Healthy control (HC) | Moderately severe malaria (MSM) | Severe malaria without cerebral malaria (SM) | Cerebral malaria (CM) | p values | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total number | 106 | 77 | 78 | 51 | |
| Age (years) | 7.4 (1.8) (n = 104) | 5.2 (1.7) (n = 76) | 5.4 (1.7) (n = 77) | 4.8 (1.3) (n = 51) | ANOVA— <0.0001 HC vs MSM— <0.0001 HC vs SM— <0.0001 HC vs CM— <0.0001MSM vs SM— NS MSM vs CM— NS SM vs CM— 0.0272 |
| Males (percent of total) | 48 (46) | 45 (59) | 38 (48) | 32 (63) | P = 0.110 |
| Weight (Kg) | 23.0 (6.2) (n = 106) | 17.7 (4.0) (n = 76) | 17.3 (3.6) (n = 76) | 17.0 (4.6) (n = 51) | ANOVA— <0.0001 HC vs MSM— <0.0001 HC vs SM— <0.0001 HC vs CM— <0.0001 MSM vs SM— NS MSM vs CM— NS SM vs CM— NS |
| Temperature (°C) | 36.6 (36.5–36.8) (n = 106) | 37.4 (36.7–38.5) (n = 76) | 37.4 (36.7–38.0) (n = 77) | 38.0 (36.9–38.8) (n = 51) | Kruskal Wallis— <0.0001 HC vs MSM— <0.0001 HC vs SM— <0.0001 HC vs CM— <0.0001 MSM vs SM— NS MSM vs CM—NS SM vs CM— 0.0415 |
| Heart rate (beats/min) | 91 (86–97) (n = 106) | 110 (100–120) (n = 76) | 110 (100–120) (n = 77) | 120 (105–140) (n = 51) | Kruskal Wallis— <0.0001 HC vs MSM— <0.0001 HC vs SM— <0.0001 HC vs CM— <0.0001 MSM vs SM— NS MSM vs CM— 0.0033 SM vs CM— 0.0201 |
| Respiratory rate (breaths/min) | 25 (23.0–26.0) (n = 101) | 29.5 (26.0–34.0) (n = 74) | 31.0 (28.0–38.0) (n = 77) | 38.0 (30.0–48.0) (n = 51) | Kruskal Wallis— <0.0001 HC vs MSM— <0.0001 HC vs SM— <0.0001 HC vs CM— <0.0001 MSM vs SM— 0.0188 MSM vs CM— <0.0001 SM vs CM— 0.0144 |
| Systolic blood pressure (mm Hg) | 92 (6.6) (n = 104) | 93 (6.9) (n = 70) | 91 (5.7) (n = 75) | 92 (8.2) (n = 49) | ANOVA—NS HC vs MSM— NS HC vs SM—NS HC vs CM— NS MSM vs SM— 0.0498 MSM vs CM— NS SM vs CM— NS |
| Diastolic blood pressure (mm Hg) | 60 (2.9) (n = 104) | 58 (4.8) (n = 70) | 56.4 (5.3) (n = 75) | 56 (11.1) (n = 49) | ANOVA—0.0001 HC vs MSM— 0.0004 HC vs SM— <0.0001 HC vs CM— 0.0002 MSM vs SM— 0.0438 MSM vs CM— NS SM vs CM— NS |
| Hemoglobin (gm/dL) | 12.1 (1.3) (n = 104) | 8.8 (1.9) (n = 75) | 8.4 (2.2) (n = 77) | 7.3 (2.3) (n = 50) | ANOVA— <0.0001 HC vs MSM— <0.0001 HC vs SM— <0.0001 HC vs CM— <0.0001 MSM vs SM— NS MSM vs CM— 0.0001 SM vs CM—0.0031 |
| WBC (x109/L) | 6.7 (5.7–8.2) (n = 105) | 7.2 (6.0–9.6) (n = 74) | 7.9 (5.9–11.1) (n = 77) | 8.3 (6.9–9.9) (n = 51) | Kruskal Wallis0.0035 HC vs MSM— NS HC vs SM— 0.0147 HC vs CM— 0.0006 MSM vs SM— NS MSM vs CM— NS SM vs CM— NS |
| Platelet (x109/L) | 338 (226–409) (n = 106) | 113 (71–163) (n = 74) | 80 (53–126) (n = 77) | 73 (54–104) (n = 48) | Kruskal Wallis— 0.0001 HC vs MSM— <0.0001 HC vs SM— <0.0001 HC vs CM— <0.0001 MSM vs SM— 0.0229 MSM vs CM— 0.0013 SM vs CM— NS |
| Absolute monocyte count (x109/L) | 0.51 (0.38–0.61) (n = 78) | 0.60 (0.44–0.82) (n = 66) | 0.67 (0.48–1.06) (n = 73) | 0.69 (0.49–0.99) (n = 33) | Kruskal Wallis—0.0001 HC vs MSM— 0.0062 HC vs SM— 0.0001 HC vs CM— 0.0003 MSM vs SM— NS MSM vs CM— NS SM vs CM— NS |
| Absolute neutrophil count (x109/L) | 2.6 (1.9–3.5) (n = 76) | 3.7 (2.9–5.5) (n = 65) | 4.4 (3.2–5.8) (n = 73) | 4.8 (2.9–5.9) (n = 48) | Kruskal Wallis— <0.0001 HC vs MSM— <0.0001 HC vs SM— <0.0001 HC vs CM— <0.0001 MSM vs SM— NS MSM vs CM— NS SM vs CM— NS |
| Absolute lymphocyte count (x109/L) | 2.9 (2.3–3.2) (n = 78) | 2.4 (1.7–3.1) (n = 66) | 2.1 (1.5–2.9) (n = 73) | 2.2 (1.7–3.0) (n = 33) | Kruskal Wallis 0.0074 HC vs MSM— 0.0081 HC vs SM— 0.0010 HC vs CM— 0.0012 MSM vs SM— NS MSM vs CM— NS SM vs CM— NS |
| Monocyte to lymphocyte ratio | 0.18 (0.14–0.24) (n = 77) | 0.28 (0.20–0.37) (n = 66) | 0.32 (0.23–0.41) (n = 73) | 0.31 (0.24–0.43) (n = 33) | Kruskal Wallis— <0.0001 HC vs MSM— <0.0001 HC vs SM— <0.0001 HC vs CM— <0.0001 MSM vs SM— 0.0210 MSM vs CM—NS SM vs CM— NS |
| Creatinine (mg/dL) | 0.4 (0.4–0.5) (n = 53) | 0.5 (0.4–0.6) (n = 44) | 0.4 (0.3–0.5) (n = 46) | 0.6 (0.4–0.08) (n = 32) | Kruskal Wallis— <0.0001 HC vs MSM— NS HC vs SM— 0.0386 HC vs CM— 0.0006 MSM vs SM—NS MSM vs CM— 0.0030 SM vs CM— 0.0001 |
| Blood lactate (mmol/L) | 1.9 (1.4–2.5) (n = 76) | 2.7 (1.8–3.6) (n = 55) | 2.8 (2.0–4.1) (n = 59) | 2.9 (2.0–4.7) (n = 41) | Kruskal Wallis— <0.0001 HC vs MSM— 0.0001 HC vs SM— <0.0001 HC vs CM— <0.0001 MSM vs SM— NS MSM vs CM— NS SM vs CM— NS |
| Bicarbonate (mmol/L) | 22.5 (2.9) (n = 50) | 22.3 (3.5) (n = 58) | 21.1 (3.1) (n = 59) | 19.9 (4.4)) (n = 43) | ANOVA—0.0005 HC vs MSM— NS HC vs SM— 0.0049 HC vs CM— 0.0003 MSM vs SM—0.0203 MSM vs CM— 0.0013 SM vs CM— NS |
| Parasite density (per uL) | 0 (0-0) (n = 106) | 90,280 (49,060–144,000) (n = 76) | 286,920 (203,820–400,000) (n = 78) | 177,440 (49,480–312,000) (n = 49) | Kruskal Wallis— <0.0001 HC vs MSM— N/A HC vs SM— N/A HC vs CM— N/A MSM vs SM— <0.0001 MSM vs CM— 0.0149 SM vs CM— 0.0004 |
| Histidine rich protein-2 (ng/mL) | 0.3 (0.3–0.3) (n = 60) | 163.4 (26.6–917.6) (n = 65) | 39.6 (11.9–336.9) (n = 23) | 514.1 (40.3–1194.5) (n = 35) | Kruskal Wallis— <0.0001 HC vs MSM— <0.0001 HC vs SM— <0.0001 HC vs CM— <0.0001 MSM vs SM— NS MSM vs CM— NS SM vs CM— 0.0235 |
| Angiopoietin-2 (pg/mL) | 752 (47–1340) (n = 59) | 1952 (1055–2788) (n = 64) | 2106 (1032–3213) (n = 23) | 3,651 (2,487–6,121) (n = 36) | Kruskal Wallis— <0.0001HC vs MSM— <0.0001 HC vs SM— <0.0001 HC vs CM— <0.0001 MSM vs SM— NS MSM vs CM— 0.0001 SM vs CM— 0.0054 |
| Arginine (µmol/L) | 85.8 (72.0–111.4) (n = 59) | 45.8 (34.7–60.0) (n = 64) | 49.8 (37.8–62.8) (n = 23) | 41.1 (30.7–52.1) (n = 36) | Kruskal Wallis— <0.0001 HC vs MSM— <0.0001 HC vs SM— <0.0001 HC vs CM— <0.0001 MSM vs SM—NS MSM vs CM— NS SM vs CM— NS |
| Plasma arginase (pmol/mL/hr) | 0.096 (0.062–0.191) (n = 78) | 0.118 (0.081–0.269) (n = 68) | 0.121 (0.093–0.244) (n = 60) | 0.166 (0.112–0.268) (n = 43) | Kruskal Wallis—0.0079 HC vs MSM— NS HC vs SM— 0.0288 HC vs CM— 0.0016 MSM vs SM— NS MSM vs CM—0.0491 SM vs CM— NS |
| Plasma cell-free Hb (μM) | 0.82 (0.41–1.57) (n = 60) | 0.90 (0.49–1.38) (n = 64) | 1.04 (0.58–1.31) (n = 23) | 1.22 (0.79–1.81) (n = 36) | Kruskal Wallis —NS HC vs MSM— NS HC vs SM— NS HC vs CM— NS MSM vs SM— NS MSM vs CM— 0.0455 SM vs CM— NS |
Data are presented as median (inter-quartile range) unless stated otherwise. Significance testing across groups was done by Kruskal Wallis, and pairwise comparisons were done by Mann-Whitney U tests unless stated otherwise. NS = non-significant (p > 0.05); NA = not applicable.
aMean (standard deviation). Significance testing across groups by ANOVA and pairwise comparisons by Student T-test.
bChi-square test of proportions.
Figure 1Plasma arginine (A), PBMC arginase 1 RNA (B) and protein (C), plasma arginase enzymatic activity (D), PBMC arginase 2 mRNA (E), and PBMC NOS2 RNA (F). The numbers of subjects and p values for the statistical pairwise comparisons (Mann-Whitney U) appear below the figures. The horizontal bars represent the geometric means.
Figure 2Blood monocyte cell surface CD163 and CD206, and plasma sCD163.
Monocyte surface mean fluorescence intensities for CD206 (A) and CD163 (B); plasma soluble CD163 (C); and representative percent of maximal fluorescence for CD206 (D) and CD163 (E). The numbers of subjects and p values for the statistical pairwise comparisons (Mann-Whitney U) appear below the figures. The horizontal bars represent the geometric means.
Figure 3Plasma cytokines and chemokines generally considered typical of “M1” status.
The numbers of subjects and p values for the statistical pairwise comparisons (Mann-Whitney U) appear below the figures. The horizontal bars represent the geometric means.
Figure 4Plasma cytokines and chemokines generally considered typical of “M2” status.
The numbers of subjects and p values for the statistical pairwise comparisons (Mann-Whitney U) appear below the figures. The horizontal bars represent the geometric means.
Correlations of malaria disease severity measures with arginase activity, soluble CD163 measurements, and IL-10 measurements.
| | Plasma Arginase Activity | sCD163 | IL-10 | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyte | HC | MSM | SM | All Malaria | HC | MSM | SM | All Malaria | HC | MSM | SM | All Malaria | |
| HRP-2 | r | −0.27 | 0.05 | 0.19 | 0.11 | 0.13 | 0.31 | 0.27 | 0.28 | 0.61 | 0.63 | 0.49 | |
| p | 0.15 | 0.75 | 0.31 | 0.37 | 0.51 | 0.12 | 0.39 | ||||||
| n | 31 | 41 | 31 | 72 | 28 | 26 | 12 | 38 | 24 | 15 | 39 | ||
| Ang-2 | r | 0.13 | 0.21 | 0.47 | 0.36 | −0.06 | 0.04 | 0.14 | 0.09 | −0.09 | 0.26 | 0.30 | 0.32 |
| p | 0.45 | 0.76 | 0.84 | 0.58 | 0.55 | 0.73 | |||||||
| n | 37 | 62 | 54 | 116 | 31 | 32 | 18 | 50 | 15 | 45 | 37 | 82 | |
| Lactate | r | 0.36 | 0.24 | 0.31 | 0.30 | −0.001 | 0.51 | 0.48 | 0.52 | 0.23 | 0.53 | 0.26 | 0.41 |
| p | 0.09 | 0.99 | 0.29 | 0.15 | |||||||||
| n | 57 | 49 | 84 | 133 | 37 | 25 | 36 | 61 | 23 | 39 | 33 | 72 | |
| Arginine | r | −0.34 | −0.34 | −0.32 | −0.33 | −0.14 | −0.22 | −0.07 | −0.14 | 0.12 | −0.54 | −0.022 | −0.42 |
| p | 0.40 | 0.22 | 0.78 | 0.34 | 0.55 | 0.18 | |||||||
| n | 53 | 63 | 55 | 118 | 37 | 33 | 18 | 51 | 29 | 46 | 38 | 84 | |
| Arg/ADMA | r | −0.47 | −0.23 | −0.49 | −0.36 | −0.34 | −0.08 | −0.44 | −0.22 | 0.29 | −0.35 | −0.11 | −0.26 |
| p | 0.67 | 0.13 | 0.11 | 0.49 | |||||||||
| n | 53 | 63 | 55 | 118 | 37 | 33 | 18 | 51 | 29 | 46 | 38 | 84 | |
| Hb | r | 0.02 | −0.01 | −0.03 | −0.06 | −0.01 | −0.06 | −0.07 | 0.11 | −0.37 | 0.06 | 0.28 | 0.11 |
| p | 0.87 | 0.91 | 0.76 | 0.42 | 0.95 | 0.71 | 0.61 | 0.28 | 0.70 | 0.31 | |||
| n | 77 | 66 | 102 | 168 | 54 | 41 | 51 | 92 | 29 | 45 | 38 | 83 | |
| Plt | r | 0.02 | −0.08 | 0.01 | −0.05 | 0.14 | −0.16 | −0.02 | −0.09 | −0.20 | −0.25 | −0.28 | |
| p | 0.89 | 0.50 | 0.91 | 0.48 | 0.29 | 0.31 | 0.89 | 0.35 | 0.30 | 0.14 | |||
| n | 78 | 65 | 100 | 165 | 55 | 40 | 51 | 91 | 29 | 36 | 81 | ||
*There were not enough HC subjects with data for analysis.
r = rho (correlation coefficient); p = p-value for correlation; n = number of observations for each correlation test.
Correlations with a p value < 0.10 are noted by bold print.
Figure 5Schematic drawing depicting influence of M1 or M2 monocyte activation on arginase 1 and NOS2 expression, NO production, and adherence of parasitized RBC to endothelium.
Monocytes (M) acted upon by various cytokines differentiate to (A) M1-like cells (“classically activated”) or (B) M2-like cells (“alternatively activated”). M1 cells can produce NOS2 that converts arginine to nitric oxide (NO) (A). M2 cells can produce arginase 1 that converts arginine to ornithine (ORN) and urea (B), causing depletion of arginine and reduction of NO. NO decreases expression of endothelial cell adhesion molecules (EC-CAM) (e.g., ICAM-1 and VCAM-1), and absence of NO or low NO causes increased CAM expression. RBC expressing P. falciparum-encoded proteins such as PfEMP1 bind to EC-CAM (B) causing blockage of blood flow and distal tissue ischemia. NO reduces EC-CAM expression, increases RBC deformability, and increases vascular reactivity.