| Literature DB >> 27385379 |
Jian Cao1,2, Ran Xu1, Xiaokun Zhao1, Zhaohui Zhong1, Lei Zhang1, Xuan Zhu1, Shuiqing Wu1, Kai Ai1.
Abstract
The present study sought to investigate the predictive value of preoperative clinicopathological variables, with a special focus on areca nut chewing, on disease recurrence and progression in patients with non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). Data from 242 patients diagnosed with NMIBC between 2008 and 2013 were analyzed retrospectively. Fifteen clinicopathological variables were analyzed to evaluate their prognostic value. During a mean observation period of 21 months, disease recurrence occurred in 140 patients (57.9%). On multivariate analysis, heavy-areca nut chewing (HR = 2.18, 95% CI: 1.37-3.47), current smoking (HR = 3.09, 95% CI: 1.99-4.80), moderately impaired estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (HR = 1.76, 95% CI: 1.09-2.83), severely impaired eGFR (HR = 3.32, 95% CI: 1.70-6.48) and tumor grade (HR = 1.94, 95% CI: 1.36-2.77) were independent factors for recurrence, based on which a risk factor model was developed to stratify patients into high, medium and low risk groups. In conclusion, our study suggests that in addition to quitting smoking, quitting areca nut chewing may also reduce the risk of first recurrence in NMBIC patients, monitoring and preserving their renal function may be beneficial as well. Further prospective studies are needed to verify the prognostic significance of these factors and the risk stratification model in this population.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27385379 PMCID: PMC4935873 DOI: 10.1038/srep29466
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Characteristics of 242 patients with NMIBC.
| Variables | Non-recurrencen (%) | Recurrencen (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 102(42.1) | 140(57.9) | ||
| 0 .103 | |||
| <70 | 72(29.8) | 84(34.7) | |
| ≥70 | 30(12.4) | 56(23.1) | |
| 0 .437 | |||
| Female | 28(11.6) | 36(14.9) | |
| Male | 74(30.6) | 104(43.0) | |
| 0.519 | |||
| No | 72(29.8) | 98(40.5) | |
| Yes | 30(12.4) | 42(17.4) | |
| 0.335 | |||
| No | 72(29.8) | 94(38.8) | |
| Yes | 30(12.4) | 46(19.0) | |
| Non | 77(31.8) | 68(28.1) | |
| Light | 19(7.9) | 29(12.0) | |
| Heavy | 6(2.5) | 43(17.8) | |
| Non | 74(30.6) | 62(25.6) | |
| Former | 21(8.7) | 41(16.9) | |
| Current | 7(2.9) | 37(15.3) | |
| 0.435 | |||
| <0.5 mg/dl | 48(19.8) | 74(30.6) | |
| ≥0.5 mg/dl | 54(22.3) | 66(27.3) | |
| <2.5 | 72(29.8) | 71(29.3) | |
| ≥2.5 | 30(12.4) | 69(28.5) | |
| 0.896 | |||
| <190 | 58(24.0) | 78(32.2) | |
| ≥190 | 44(18.2) | 62(25.6) | |
| ≥60 ml/min | 92(38.0) | 94(38.8) | |
| 60–20 ml/min | 8(3.3) | 35(14.5) | |
| <20 ml/min | 2(0.8) | 11(4.5) | |
| 0.436 | |||
| 1–2 | 53(21.9) | 80(33.1) | |
| ≥3 | 49(20.2) | 60(24.8) | |
| 0.363 | |||
| <3 | 58(24.0) | 71(29.3) | |
| ≥3 cm | 44(18.2) | 69(28.3) | |
| 0.432 | |||
| Ta | 55(22.7) | 83(34.3) | |
| T1 | 47(19.4) | 57(23.6) | |
| low | 71(29.3) | 77(31.8) | |
| high | 31(12.8) | 63(26.0) | |
| 0.305 | |||
| Mitomycin | 25(10.3) | 31(12.8) | |
| Epirubicin | 48(19.8) | 56(21.9) | |
| Gemcitabine | 29(12.0) | 53(21.9) | |
| Mean(rang) | 31.3(3–71) | 13.1(2–34) |
Percentage of the total 242 patients; C-RP: C-reactive protein.
NLR: neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio; PLR: platelet to lymphocyte ratio.
eGFR: estimated glomerular filtration rate.
Results from the univariate and multivariate analyses of recurrence.
| Univariate HR(95% CI) | Multivariate HR(95% CI) | Regression | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coefficient | |||||
| 1.27(0.91–1.79) | 0.163 | ||||
| 1.22(0.83–1.78) | 0.314 | ||||
| 1.08(0.75–1.56) | 0.665 | ||||
| 1.06(0.75–1.51) | 0.735 | ||||
| Non (reference) | |||||
| Light | |||||
| Heavy | |||||
| Non (reference) | |||||
| Former | |||||
| Current | |||||
| 1.03(0.74–1.44) | 0.852 | ||||
| 1.10(0.79–1.54) | 0.573 | ||||
| >60 ml/min (reference) | |||||
| 60–20 ml/min | |||||
| <20 ml/min | |||||
| per 1 mL/min/1.73 m2 | |||||
| 1.20(0.86–1.68) | 0.282 | ||||
| 1.15(0.40–1.61) | 0.398 | ||||
| 1.23(0.88–1.73) | 0.226 | ||||
| Mitomycin (reference) | |||||
| Epirubicin | 0.77(0.50–1.20) | 0.254 | |||
| Gemcitabine | 0.78(0.50–1.21) | 0.262 | |||
P values in bold indicate a significant difference. Regression coefficient from Multivariate Cox analysis. HR: hazard ratio.
C-RP: C-reactive protein; NLR: neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio; PLR: platelet to lymphocyte ratio; eGFR: estimated glomerular filtration rate.
Risk group classifications.
| Risk Group | Prognostic Score | Patients n (%) | Mean time to recurrence (months) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Low | 0 | 99(40.9) | 45.23(95% CI: 39.54–50.91) |
| Medium | 1 | 123(50.8) | 24.74(95% CI: 20.9–28.59) |
| High | 2–3 | 20(8.3) | 7.75(95% CI: 5.97–9.53) |
The prognostic score was calculated as follows: eGFR (60–20 ml/min) × 0.56/1.199 + eGFR (<20 ml/min) × 1.199 /1.199 + Current-Smoker × 1.128/1.199 + Heavy-areca nut chewing × 0.778/1.199 + Grade-high × 0.663/1.199.
Figure 1Kaplan-Meier analysis of the recurrence-free survival of NMIBC patients, stratified by risk group.
Significance was determined for the comparisons of all group-pair combinations.