Literature DB >> 27385377

Combined Foley's catheter with vaginal misoprostol for pre-induction cervical ripening: A randomised controlled trial.

Olusola P Aduloju1, Akinyemi A Akintayo1, Abiodun I Adanikin1, Idowu P Ade-Ojo1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pre-induction cervical ripening greatly influences the outcome of induction of labour (IOL). AIMS: To compare the efficacy of combined Foley's catheter and vaginal misoprostol with Foley's catheter or low-dose vaginal misoprostol alone for cervical ripening.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Women with a singleton pregnancy admitted at term for cervical ripening and IOL based on clinical indication were randomised into three groups. Oxytocin augmentation was done in the groups as indicated. Significant tests were done using chi square, Fisher's exact and analysis of variance tests.
RESULTS: A total of 210 women were randomised into the study. Women in the combined group (Foley's catheter and vaginal misoprostol) had significantly higher postcervical ripening Bishop's score than the women in the other two groups; P = 0.001. Cervical ripening time, induction-delivery time and cervical ripening-delivery interval were significantly shorter in the combined group compared to the other two groups; P = 0.001. Also, women in the combined group required significantly lesser oxytocin augmentation than the other two groups; P = 0.001. There was no difference in Apgar scores at 1 or 5 minutes or in special baby care unit admission among the groups. There were no reported cases of uterine contractile abnormalities or rupture in this study.
CONCLUSION: Combined Foley's catheter and vaginal misoprostol provide a shorter duration to the achievement of cervical ripening.
© 2016 The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Foley's catheter; Nigeria; cervical ripening; induction of labour; misoprostol

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27385377     DOI: 10.1111/ajo.12489

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol        ISSN: 0004-8666            Impact factor:   2.100


  5 in total

1.  Intracervical Foley Catheter Plus Intravaginal Misoprostol vs Intravaginal Misoprostol Alone for Cervical Ripening: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Howard Hao Lee; Ben-Shian Huang; Min Cheng; Chang-Ching Yeh; I-Chia Lin; Huann-Cheng Horng; Hsin-Yi Huang; Wen-Ling Lee; Peng-Hui Wang
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-03-11       Impact factor: 3.390

2.  Retrospective Analysis of the Factors Affecting the Induction of Childbirth in 4350 Women from a Single Center in Warsaw, Poland.

Authors:  Grażyna Bączek; Ewa Rzońca; Patryk Rzońca; Sylwia Rychlewicz; Margareta Budner; Agnieszka Bień
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-08-03       Impact factor: 4.614

Review 3.  Mechanical methods for induction of labour.

Authors:  Marieke Dt de Vaan; Mieke Lg Ten Eikelder; Marta Jozwiak; Kirsten R Palmer; Miranda Davies-Tuck; Kitty Wm Bloemenkamp; Ben Willem J Mol; Michel Boulvain
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-10-18

4.  Controlled Release Dinoprostone Insert and Foley Compared to Foley Alone: A Randomized Pilot Trial.

Authors:  Rodney K Edwards; Michelle L Norris; Mitchell D West; Christina Zornes; Katherine A Loeffler; Jennifer D Peck
Journal:  Am J Perinatol       Date:  2020-03-02       Impact factor: 3.079

5.  Sublingual Misoprostol versus Foley catheter for cervical ripening in women with preeclampsia or gestational hypertension: A randomized control trial.

Authors:  Sedigheh Ayati; Elahe Hasanzadeh; Leila Pourali; Mohammadtaghi Shakeri; Atiye Vatanchi
Journal:  Int J Reprod Biomed       Date:  2019-07-31
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.