| Literature DB >> 27385226 |
Jian Ji1, Minfeng Liu2, Yue Meng3, Runqi Liu2, Yan Yan2, Jianyu Dong2, Zhaoze Guo2, Changsheng Ye2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND The lymphatic system plays a significant role in the defense of a subject against breast cancer and is one of the major pathways for the metastasis of breast cancer. To improve the prognosis, many means, including surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy, have been used. However, the combination of all these modalities has limited efficacy. Lymph nodes, therefore, have become an exceptionally potential target organ in cancer chemotherapy. MATERIAL AND METHODS A lymph node metastatic model of breast cancer was established in BALB/c mice. Magnetic multi-walled carbon nanotube carrier with good adsorption and lymph node-targeting capacity was prepared and conjugated with doxorubicin to make the magnetic multi-walled carbon nanotube-doxorubicin suspension. Dispersions of doxorubicin, magnetic multi-walled carbon nanotube-doxorubicin, and magnetic multi-walled carbon nanotube were injected into lymph node metastatic mice to compare their inhibitory effects on tumor cells in vivo. Inhibition of these dispersions on EMT-6 breast cancer cells was detected via MTT assay in vitro. RESULTS Although no significant difference was found between the effects of doxorubicin and magnetic multi-walled carbon nanotube-doxorubicin with the same concentration of doxorubicin on EMT-6 breast cancer cells in vitro, in terms of sizes of metastatic lymph nodes and xenograft tumors, apoptosis in metastatic lymph nodes, and adverse reactions, the magnetic multi-walled carbon nanotube-doxorubicin group differed significantly from the other groups. CONCLUSIONS The magnetic multi-walled carbon nanotube-doxorubicin clearly played an inhibitory role in lymph node metastases to EMT-6 breast cancer cells.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27385226 PMCID: PMC4946588 DOI: 10.12659/msm.898597
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Med Sci Monit ISSN: 1234-1010
Figure 1The static observation about the O-mMWNT-PEG suspension liquid and the effect caused by magnet attraction. The O-mMWNT-PEG suspension liquid placed for 1 week (a1); the O-mMWNT-PEG suspension liquid placed for 2 weeks (a2); the O-mMWNT-PEG suspension liquid placed for 1 month (a3). Picture B indicates that O-mMWNT-PEG gathered quickly (within 1 min) on the side where the magnet was placed.
Figure 2The MWNT and O-mMWNT-PEG under the TEM. MWNT without the modification of Fe3O4 (A, C) and MWNT with the modification of Fe3O4 (B, D). There were evenly distributed black particles – Fe3O4 – settled and absorbed onto the surface of the hollow MWNT tubes.
Figure 3The absorption value of the DOX under the UV-Vis-NIR. This figure indicates the absorption peak of the DOX was at 480 nm and DOX conjugated by O-mMWNT-PEG accounted for 80% of the DOX total dose.
Figure 4The inhibition ratio to the EMT-6 cell from different groups of medicines. * P<0.01 vs. both group of O-mMWNT-PEG.
Figure 5The general samples and HE staining of transplanted tumor and metastatic lymph node. The red arrows show the general samples of the transplanted tumor and the metastatic lymph node, respectively (A, B). Photograph C and D show the HE staining (10×20) of the transplanted tumor and the metastatic lymph node, respectively. We found cancer cells of different sizes and shapes. Such cells were deformed, mostly in the shape of a nest, glandular tube, or in disorder (C, D).
The comparison of the weight, the volume of the tumor from the mice before and after given the medicine as well as the weight and the volume of the popliteal lymph node.
| Group | Before admininstration | After administration | Lymph nodes on the popliteal fossa | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Weight of the mice (g) | Tumor volume (mm3) | Weight of the mice (g) | Tumor volume (mm3) | Mass (g) | Volume (mm3) | |
| A | 24.14±1.22 | 107.21±38.31 | 24.71±1.80 | 205.29±61.1 | 21.73±6.20 | 23.11±7.21 |
| B | 23.00±1.16 | 103.71±26.58 | 23.71±1.60 | 214.71±61.25 | 31.71±8.06 | 32.74±7.45 |
| C | 23.43±1.62 | 108.00±42.40 | 24.14±1.46 | 168.71±48.58 | 20.40±8.06 | 22.20±7.66 |
| D | 23.29±1.38 | 89.86±21.43 | 23.86±1.57 | 144.86±30.25 | 15.64±5.23 | 18.49±5.23 |
| E | 24.14±1.57 | 101.57±41.5 | 24.71±1.50 | 152.43±58.89 | 9.57±3.46 | 11.07±3.32 |
| F | 23.29±1.80 | 102.57±28.75 | 24.14±1.54 | 158.86±33.35 | 12.83±4.61 | 11.14±4.49 |
Is comparison between Group C, D, E, F and Group A, B, P<0.05,
is comparison between Group B, E, F and Group A, P<0.05;
is comparison between Group C,D, E, F and Group B, P<0.05;
is comparison between Group E, F and Group C, D, P<0.05.
Is comparison between Group B, E, F and Group A, P<0.05;
is comparison between Group C, D, E, F and Group B, P<0.05;
is comparison between Group E, F and Group C, P<0.05.
The comparison of blood routine and biochemical criterion among the mouses from each groups.
| Group | WBC (×109/L) | RBC (×109/L) | HB (g/L) | PLT (×109/L) | ALT (U/L) | Scr (μmol/L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 8.81±1.80 | 9.66±0.86 | 13.2±7.0 | 208.2±118.1 | 60.2±14.8 | 33.8±2.3 |
| B | 9.1±2.43 | 10.25±0.39 | 17.1±0.6 | 157.6±29.3 | 63.1±10.5 | 33.1±4.5 |
| C | 3.31±1.26 | 9.89±0.74 | 16.4±1.7 | 185.0±102.9 | 73.4±18.3 | 30.1±8.7 |
| D | 4.35±1.35 | 9.32±2.44 | 14.5±6.3 | 157.6±100.1 | 65.1±15.7 | 34.0±3.3 |
| E | 5.15±1.51 | 9.83±1.26 | 14.9±4.7 | 199.1±71.7 | 63.7±19.1 | 33.8±3.5 |
| F | 4.16±1.68 | 9.80±1.01 | 14.5±5.9 | 156.3±87.0 | 66.1±18.2 | 34.5±8.2 |
P<0.05 vs. group A and B.
Figure 6(A–D) The distribution and the inhibition ratio of the weight and volume of lymph node in each group. * P<0.05 vs. group E, F, ** P<0.05 vs. group B. Figure B and D used the volume and the weight of the lymph nodes of group A as baseline. Over the x axis, the positive half refers to the increases of the volume and the weight, while the other half refers to the inhibition of the weight and the volume. The number equals the inhibition ratio.
Figure 7Tumor cell apoptosis of the popliteal lymph nodes. * P<0.05 vs. group C, D, E, F, ** P<0.05 vs. group E, F, *** P<0.05 vs. group F. In picture B, cells, which nuclear stained in yellow or brown, were the tumor apoptotic cells.
Figure 8The pathological section from the organs of mice and the general observation of the injected part. There was no gathering of multi-walled carbon nanotube particles in heart, liver, spleen, lung, or kidney of the mice, or pathological changes such as inflammation, fibrosis, or granuloma in these such organs (A–E). The injection site showed no redness, swelling, ulceration, or corrosion (F).