Literature DB >> 27384725

En Bloc Resection of Primary Malignant Bone Tumor in the Cervical Spine Based on 3-Dimensional Printing Technology.

Jian-Ru Xiao1, Wen-Ding Huang2, Xing-Hai Yang1, Wang-Jun Yan1, Dian-Wen Song1, Hai-Feng Wei1, Tie-Long Liu1, Zhi-Peng Wu1, Cheng Yang1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the feasibility and safety of en bloc resection of cervical primary malignant bone tumors by a combined anterior and posterior approach based on a three-dimensional (3-D) printing model.
METHODS: Five patients with primary malignant bone tumors of the cervical spine underwent en bloc resection via a one-stage combined anteroposterior approach in our hospital from March 2013 to June 2014. They comprised three men and two women of mean age 47.2 years (range, 26-67 years). Three of the tumors were chondrosarcomas and two chordomas. Preoperative 3-D printing models were created by 3-D printing technology. Sagittal en bloc resections were planned based on these models and successfully performed. A 360° reconstruction was performed by spinal instrumentation in all cases. Surgical margins, perioperative complications, local control rate and survival rate were assessed.
RESULTS: All patients underwent en bloc excision via a combined posterior and anterior approach in one stage. Mean operative time and estimated blood loss were 465 minutes and 1290 mL, respectively. Mean follow-up was 21 months. Wide surgical margins were achieved in two patients and marginal resection in three; these three patients underwent postoperative adjuvant radiation therapy. One vertebral artery was ligated and sacrificed in each of three patients. Nerve root involved by tumor was sacrificed in three patients with preoperative upper extremity weakness. One patient (Case 3) had significant transient radiculopathy with paresis postoperatively. Another (Case 4) with C 4 and C 5 chordoma had respiratory difficulties and pneumonia after surgery postoperatively. He recovered completely after 2 weeks' management with a tracheotomy tube and antibiotics in the intensive care unit. No cerebrovascular complications and wound infection were observed. No local recurrence or instrumentation failure were detected during follow-up.
CONCLUSION: Though technically challenging, it is feasible and safe to perform en bloc resection of cervical primary bone tumors. This is the most effective means of managing cervical spine tumors. Preoperative 3-D printing modelling enables better anatomical understanding of the relationship between the tumor and cervical spine and can assist in planning the surgical procedure.
© 2016 Chinese Orthopaedic Association and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D-printing model; Cervical spine; Complication; En bloc resection; Primary tumor

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27384725      PMCID: PMC6584397          DOI: 10.1111/os.12234

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthop Surg        ISSN: 1757-7853            Impact factor:   2.071


  16 in total

Review 1.  Current status of 3D printing in spine surgery.

Authors:  Bhavuk Garg; Nishank Mehta
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2018-08-07

Review 2.  Systematic review of 3D printing in spinal surgery: the current state of play.

Authors:  Ben Wilcox; Ralph J Mobbs; Ai-Min Wu; Kevin Phan
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2017-09

Review 3.  3D printing in spine surgery.

Authors:  Evan D Sheha; Sapan D Gandhi; Matthew W Colman
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-09

Review 4.  [3D printing in spinal surgery-Update].

Authors:  S Roth; S Sehmisch; S Decker
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2022-02-17       Impact factor: 1.000

5.  [Application of three-dimensional printing technology in treatment of limb bone tumors].

Authors:  Xiaohui Niu; Tao Jin; Hairong Xu
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2022-07-15

6.  Preoperative Planning Using Three-dimensional Printing for Full-endoscopic Spine Surgery: A Technical Note.

Authors:  Ryo Okada; Toshinori Sakai; Toshihiko Nishisho; Akihiro Nitta; Shigeyuki Takahara; Koichi Oba; Koichi Sairyo
Journal:  NMC Case Rep J       Date:  2022-08-20

Review 7.  The evolution of three-dimensional technology in musculoskeletal oncology.

Authors:  Vishaal Nanik Thadani; Muhammad Jahangir Riaz; Gurpal Singh
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2018-07-25

Review 8.  Three-dimensional Printing in Orthopaedic Surgery: Current Applications and Future Developments.

Authors:  Colleen M Wixted; Jonathan R Peterson; Rishin J Kadakia; Samuel B Adams
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev       Date:  2021-04-20

9.  Patient Education for Endoscopic Sinus Surgery: Preliminary Experience Using 3D-Printed Clinical Imaging Data.

Authors:  Ian M Sander; Taimi T Liepert; Evan L Doney; W Matthew Leevy; Douglas R Liepert
Journal:  J Funct Biomater       Date:  2017-04-07

10.  3D printing-assisted preoperative plan of pedicle screw placement for middle-upper thoracic trauma: a cohort study.

Authors:  Wei Xu; Xuming Zhang; Tie Ke; Hongru Cai; Xiang Gao
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2017-08-11       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.