Literature DB >> 2738468

Visual and phonological processing of words: a comparison of good and poor readers.

B R Foorman, D Liberman.   

Abstract

At the beginning of the school year, 80 first graders, half receiving phonics instruction and half receiving whole word instruction, were asked to spell, read aloud, and recognize 60 regular and exception words. A standardized reading test and phoneme segmentation test were also administered. Those above grade level in reading excelled in phonological recording and application of grapheme-phoneme correspondence rules and were weaker in utilization of visual-orthographic knowledge. Those below grade level applied visual more than phonological coding and benefited from the visual-orthographic knowledge available in a clue word. Results support a continuum of visual and phonological analysis skills in first-grade reading consistent with Frith's (1985) logographic, alphabetic, and orthographic skill levels.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2738468     DOI: 10.1177/002221948902200605

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Learn Disabil        ISSN: 0022-2194


  5 in total

1.  Word length, phonemic, and visual similarity effects in poor and normal readers.

Authors:  Alan M McNeil; Rhona S Johnston
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2004-07

2.  The evidence for a temporal processing deficit linked to dyslexia: A review.

Authors:  M E Farmer; R M Klein
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1995-12

3.  Poor readers' use of orthographic information in learning to read new words: a visual bias or a phonological deficit?

Authors:  Alan M McNeil; Rhona S Johnston
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2008-04

4.  Children Learn to Read: How Visual Analysis and Mental Imagery Contribute to the Reading Performances at Different Stages of Reading Acquisition.

Authors:  Elena Commodari; Maria Guarnera; Andrea Di Stefano; Santo Di Nuovo
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2020-02

5.  Strategy choice mediates the link between auditory processing and spelling.

Authors:  Tru E Kwong; Kyle J Brachman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-09-08       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.