| Literature DB >> 27384488 |
Xin Wang1,2,3, Yaling Yu1,4, Miaozhong Li1,2,3, Ali Alkhawaji5,6, Chuan Chen1,2, Xiaolin Liu1,4, Junqun Jiang1,4, Jianse Zhang1,4, Zhibin Wang1,4, Ting Li1,4, Weiwen Zhang2,3, Jin Mei1,4,7.
Abstract
Decellularized renal scaffolds have previously been used for renal regeneration following partial nephrectomy, in which angiogenesis played a key role. In this study, rats underwent partial nephrectomy and repaired with decellularized renal scaffolds. Subsequently, the labeled EPCs were intravenously injected into rats in EPCs group, and the control group received an equal amount of phosphate-buffer saline (PBS). We chose 1, 2 and 4 weeks post operation as time point. Average microvascular density (aMVD) analyses revealed higher angiogenesis in EPCs group compared with the control group. The expression of angiogenic growth factors including vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), platelet derived growth factor (PDGF) and hypoxia-inducible factors 1-alpha (HIF-1α), was generally higher in the EPCs group in all weeks (1, 2 and 4), and peaked in week 2. EPCs were observed to home into renal injury site, promoting angiogenesis across the renal parenchyma-scaffold interface to be potentially used as bridges for EPCs to migrate into the implanted scaffolds. Administration of exogenous EPCs promotes angiogenesis and vasculogenesis in decellularized renal scaffolds-mediated renal regeneration, providing adequate microenvironment for kidney recovery post renal injury.Entities:
Keywords: Pathology Section; angiogenesis; decellularized scaffolds; endothelial progenitor cells; homing
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27384488 PMCID: PMC5216696 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.10377
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oncotarget ISSN: 1949-2553
Figure 1Angiogenesis in decellularized scaffold-grafted kidney
A. Gross appearances of scaffold grafted-kidney on week 1 (A1), week 2 (A2) and week 4 (A3). B. H&E staining of angiogenesis in decellularized scaffold-grafted kidney on week 1 (B1), week 2 (B2) and week 4 (B3). Scale bars = 25 μm. C. Design drawing of this research. Left kidney was chose to operate partial nephrectomy. Defect wound was repaired with decellularized renal scaffold. On the operative day, EPCs were injected intravenously.
Figure 6Average microvessel density in residual renal parenchyma and scaffold
Residual renal parenchyma in experiment group A. show more vessels than in control group B. in week 2. Difference results showed in C. (P < 0.05). And the scaffolds in experiment group D. show higher aMVD than the control group E. Difference results showed in F. (P < 0.05). Scale bars = 50μm.
Figure 2Immunofluorescence characterization of EPCs
A. Immunofluorescence assay of EPCs revealed the expression of vascular endothelial cells surface biomarkers, CD31, CD34 and CD133 (red) and VEGF (green). Scale bars = 100μm. B. Immunofluorescence labeled EPCs: Dil-acLDL (red) and FITC-UEA (green). Scale bars = 50μm.
Figure 3Microscopic characteristics of decellularized scaffolds and EPCs co-cultured with decellularized scaffold
A. Three-dimensional structure of microvasculature was maintained in decellularized scaffold (100μm). B. Immunofluorescence assay of EPCs co-cultured with decellularized scaffold demonstrating adherence to the scaffold. Scale bars: = 25μm C.-E. Immunofluorescence assay of EPCs demonstrating the expression of BrdU when co-culture with decellularized scaffold (C) and without (D), suggesting that decellularized scaffolds possess the ability to enhance the adhesion and proliferation of co-cultured EPCs. (*P < 0.05) (E). Scale bars: = 50μm.
Figure 4Immunofluorescence tracking of EPCs trafficking
A. Immunofluorescence assay detection of CM-Dil labeled EPCs (red) in lung, liver, spleen and heart of rats in EPCs and control groups. The labeled EPCs were detected in lungs and spleen of rats in EPCs and control groups without significant differences. B. Immunofluorescence assay detection of CM-Dil labeled EPCs (red) in left and right kidneys of rats in EPCs and control groups. A large number of EPCs was found homing to the scaffold recipient-kidney compared to the contralateral intact kidney. However, CM-Dil labeled EPCs were absent in right kidney in both groups (*P<0.05). Scale bar: A-B = 50 μm.
Figure 5Expressions of related angiogenic growth factors
A. WB assay showing protein expression of VEGF, PDGF, HIF-1α, Pax2 and CD133 in week 1, 2 and 4 postoperatively. Compared with the control group, PDGF, HIF-1α, Pax2 in EPCs group were significantly expressed in all time points, except VEGF in week 1 and CD133 in week 1, 2, 4. B. qPCR of VEGF, PDGF, HIF-1α and Pax2 assay showing significant gene expression of factors in all time points.
Gene sequences
| Gene | Sequences |
|---|---|
| VEGFB | Forward 5′-GGCCTCTGAAACCATGAACT-3′ |
| Reverse 5′-ATGCTGCAGGAAGCTCATCT-3′ | |
| PDGF | Forward 5′-GGCCTGCAAGTGTGAGACAGTAGTG-3′ |
| Reverse 5′-TTGAGGTGTCTTGGCTCGATGC-3′ | |
| HIF-1α | Forward 5′-AGCTTCTGTTATGAGGCTCACCATC-3′ |
| Reverse 5′-TCTTCAATGTCAAGATCACCAGCAC-3′ | |
| Pax2 | Forward 5′-AATCCTGGGCAGGTACTACGAGAC-3′ |
| Reverse 5′-TGTATTCAGCAATCTTGTCCACCAC-3′ | |
| Actb | Forward 5′-CGTAAAGACCTCTATGCCAACA-3′ |
| Reverse 5′-GGAGGAGCAATGATCTTGATCT-3′ |