Literature DB >> 27384430

Tumor Biology Rather Than Surgical Technique Dictates Prognosis in Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases.

Georgios Antonios Margonis1, Kazunari Sasaki1, Yuhree Kim1, Mario Samaha1, Stefan Buettner1, Neda Amini1, Efstathios Antoniou2, Timothy M Pawlik3.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The interplay of tumor biology and surgical margin status after resection for colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) remains controversial. Consequently, we sought to determine the impact of surgical margin status on overall survival (OS) stratified by KRAS mutational status.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four hundred eighty-five patients with known KRAS mutational status were identified. Clinicopathologic and long-term survival data were collected and assessed.
RESULTS: On pathology, most patients (n = 380; 78.3 %) had an R0 margin, while 105 (21.7 %) had an R1. Roughly two thirds of tumors were KRAS wild type (wtKRAS) (n = 307, 63.3 %), while 36.7 % (n = 178) had KRAS mutations (mutKRAS). Median and 5-year OS of the entire cohort was 65.8 months and 53.8 %, respectively. An R1 resection was associated with worse 5-year OS compared with R0 (42.4 % vs. 57.1 %; hazard ratio (HR) 1.82, 95 % CI 1.28-2.57; P = 0.001). After controlling for KRAS status, the survival benefit associated with an R0 resection persisted only among patients with wtKRAS tumors (HR 2.16, 95 % CI 1.42-3.30; P < 0.001). In contrast, surgical margin had no impact on OS among patients with mutKRAS tumors (5-year OS R0, 40.7 % vs. R1, 46.7 %; HR 1.34, 95 % CI 0.73-2.48; P = 0.348).
CONCLUSION: The impact of margin status differed by KRAS mutation status. An R0 margin only provided a survival benefit to patients with wtKRAS tumors. Tumor biology and not surgical technique determined prognosis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CRLM; KRAS mutation; Tumor biology

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27384430     DOI: 10.1007/s11605-016-3198-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg        ISSN: 1091-255X            Impact factor:   3.452


  44 in total

1.  The impact of margins on outcome after hepatic resection for colorectal metastasis.

Authors:  Chandrakanth Are; Mithat Gonen; Kathleen Zazzali; Ronald P Dematteo; William R Jarnagin; Yuman Fong; Leslie H Blumgart; Michael D'Angelica
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Technical and biological factors in disease-free survival after hepatic resection for colorectal cancer metastases.

Authors:  B Cady; M D Stone; W V McDermott; R L Jenkins; A Bothe; P T Lavin; E J Lovett; G D Steele
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1992-05

3.  Association Between Specific Mutations in KRAS Codon 12 and Colorectal Liver Metastasis.

Authors:  Georgios Antonios Margonis; Yuhree Kim; Gaya Spolverato; Aslam Ejaz; Rohan Gupta; David Cosgrove; Robert Anders; Georgios Karagkounis; Michael A Choti; Timothy M Pawlik
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 14.766

Review 4.  Surgical Management of Liver Metastases From Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Mashaal Dhir; Aaron R Sasson
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 3.840

Review 5.  Colorectal liver metastases.

Authors:  Ching-Wei D Tzeng; Thomas A Aloia
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2012-10-03       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Factors influencing survival of patients undergoing hepatectomy for colorectal metastases.

Authors:  J Yamamoto; K Shimada; T Kosuge; S Yamasaki; M Sakamoto; H Fukuda
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 7.  Surgery for colorectal liver metastases: The evolution of determining prognosis.

Authors:  Gaya Spolverato; Aslam Ejaz; Nilo Azad; Timothy M Pawlik
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2013-12-15

8.  Determinants of survival in liver resection for colorectal secondaries.

Authors:  H Ekberg; K G Tranberg; R Andersson; C Lundstedt; I Hägerstrand; J Ranstam; S Bengmark
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 6.939

9.  Outcome of microscopic incomplete resection (R1) of colorectal liver metastases in the era of neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Ninos Ayez; Zarina S Lalmahomed; Alexander M M Eggermont; Jan N M Ijzermans; Jeroen de Jonge; Kees van Montfort; Cornelis Verhoef
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 5.344

10.  BRAF and RAS mutations as prognostic factors in metastatic colorectal cancer patients undergoing liver resection.

Authors:  M Schirripa; F Bergamo; C Cremolini; M Casagrande; S Lonardi; G Aprile; D Yang; F Marmorino; G Pasquini; E Sensi; C Lupi; G De Maglio; N Borrelli; S Pizzolitto; G Fasola; R Bertorelle; M Rugge; G Fontanini; V Zagonel; F Loupakis; A Falcone
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2015-05-05       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  12 in total

1.  Liver resection is justified for patients with bilateral multiple colorectal liver metastases: A propensity-score-matched analysis.

Authors:  Kiyohiko Omichi; Junichi Shindoh; Jordan M Cloyd; Takashi Mizuno; Yun Shin Chun; Claudius Conrad; Thomas A Aloia; Ching-Wei D Tzeng; Jean-Nicolas Vauthey
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2017-11-24       Impact factor: 4.424

Review 2.  Impact and clinical usefulness of genetic data in the surgical management of colorectal cancer liver metastasis: a narrative review.

Authors:  Georgios Antonios Margonis; Martin E Kreis; Jaeyun Jane Wang; Carsten Kamphues; Christopher L Wolfgang; Matthew J Weiss
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 7.293

3.  Genetic And Morphological Evaluation (GAME) score for patients with colorectal liver metastases.

Authors:  G A Margonis; K Sasaki; S Gholami; Y Kim; N Andreatos; N Rezaee; A Deshwar; S Buettner; P J Allen; T P Kingham; T M Pawlik; J He; J L Cameron; W R Jarnagin; C L Wolfgang; M I D'Angelica; M J Weiss
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2018-04-25       Impact factor: 6.939

4.  The Prognostic Value of Varying Definitions of Positive Resection Margin in Patients with Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases.

Authors:  Jane Wang; Georgios Antonios Margonis; Neda Amini; Nikolaos Andreatos; Chunhui Yuan; Christos Damaskos; Efstathios Antoniou; Nikolaos Garmpis; Stefan Buettner; Carlotta Barbon; Amar Deshwar; Jin He; Richard Burkhart; Timothy M Pawlik; Christopher L Wolfgang; Matthew J Weiss
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2018-04-09       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 5.  Colorectal Liver Metastases: Does the Future of Precision Medicine Lie in Genetic Testing?

Authors:  Carlotta Barbon; Georgios Antonios Margonis; Nikolaos Andreatos; Neda Rezaee; Kazunari Sasaki; Stefan Buettner; Christos Damaskos; Timothy M Pawlik; Jin He; Christopher L Wolfgang; Matthew J Weiss
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2018-04-11       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Can molecular biomarkers replace a clinical risk score for resectable colorectal liver metastasis?

Authors:  Torhild Veen; Kjetil Søreide
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2017-03-15

Review 7.  Current status of surgical treatment of colorectal liver metastases.

Authors:  Feng Xu; Bin Tang; Tian-Qiang Jin; Chao-Liu Dai
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2018-11-26       Impact factor: 1.337

8.  Prognostic and Therapeutic Implications of Tumor Biology in Colorectal Liver Metastases.

Authors:  Carsten Kamphues; Katharina Beyer; Georgios Antonios Margonis
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-24       Impact factor: 6.639

9.  Prognostic factors of survival and a new scoring system for liver resection of colorectal liver metastasis.

Authors:  Kai-Chi Cheng; Ada Sze-Man Yip
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2022-01-27

Review 10.  Colorectal liver metastases: Current management and future perspectives.

Authors:  Jack Martin; Angelica Petrillo; Elizabeth C Smyth; Nadeem Shaida; Samir Khwaja; H K Cheow; Adam Duckworth; Paula Heister; Raaj Praseedom; Asif Jah; Anita Balakrishnan; Simon Harper; Siong Liau; Vasilis Kosmoliaptsis; Emmanuel Huguet
Journal:  World J Clin Oncol       Date:  2020-10-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.