| Literature DB >> 27384070 |
Linda Worrall1, Nina Simmons-Mackie2, Sarah J Wallace1, Tanya Rose1, Marian C Brady3, Anthony Pak Hin Kong4, Laura Murray5, Brooke Hallowell6.
Abstract
Health professionals, researchers, and policy makers often consider the two terms aphasia and dysphasia to be synonymous. The aim of this article is to argue the merits of the exclusive use of the term aphasia and present a strategy for creating change through institutions such as the WHO-ICD. Our contention is that one term avoids confusion, speech-language pathologists prefer aphasia, scholarly publications indicate a preference for the term aphasia, stroke clinical guidelines indicate a preference for the term aphasia, consumer organizations use the title aphasia in their name and on their websites, and languages other than English use a term similar to aphasia. The use of the term dysphasia in the broader medical community may stem from the two terms being used interchangeably in the ICD10. Aphasia United http://www.shrs.uq.edu.au/aphasiaunited , an international movement for uniting the voice of all stakeholders in aphasia within an international context, will seek to eliminate the use of the term dysphasia.Entities:
Keywords: Terminology; aphasia; dysphasia; stroke
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27384070 DOI: 10.1177/1747493016654487
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Stroke ISSN: 1747-4930 Impact factor: 5.266