Literature DB >> 27383866

(Don't) Mind the effort: Effects of contextual interference on ERP indicators of motor preparation.

Romy Frömer1,2, Birgit Stürmer3, Werner Sommer3.   

Abstract

Motor learning is associated with a decrease in frontal control-related brain activity and increase of central and parietal motor-related activity. Contextual interference (CI), manipulated typically by blocked versus randomized training schedules, affects motor learning, resulting in inferior performance during training but in superior performance during retention and transfer. The CI effect is often explained by increased processing demands under high CI training. Consistently, in the motor preparation phase, the activity of control- and attention-related brain areas is increased under high CI. Here, we investigated the effect of CI on learning-related changes in ERPs during motor preparation. Participants learned throwing at virtual targets and were tested for retention in the target condition 1 week later. The frontal P3 component decreased with learning during the first session and across sessions. In addition, there was a trend for a stronger reduction of P3 during retention after high CI training. Both initial and late contingent negative variation (iCNV and lCNV) amplitudes decreased with learning and showed a significantly stronger reduction under high CI. We conclude that CI modulates the interplay of cognitive and motor processes in the preparatory phase of motor learning and that a stronger involvement of cognitive processes during high CI training accounts for differential effects of CI on ERP indicators of motor preparation during retention.
© 2016 Society for Psychophysiological Research.

Entities:  

Keywords:  P3, CNV, Motor preparation, Skill acquisition, Contextual interference

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27383866     DOI: 10.1111/psyp.12703

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychophysiology        ISSN: 0048-5772            Impact factor:   4.016


  5 in total

1.  Response-based outcome predictions and confidence regulate feedback processing and learning.

Authors:  Romy Frömer; Matthew R Nassar; Rasmus Bruckner; Birgit Stürmer; Werner Sommer; Nick Yeung
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-04-30       Impact factor: 8.140

2.  Neural Mechanisms of the Contextual Interference Effect and Parameter Similarity on Motor Learning in Older Adults: An EEG Study.

Authors:  Meysam Beik; Hamidreza Taheri; Alireza Saberi Kakhki; Majid Ghoshuni
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2020-06-12       Impact factor: 5.750

3.  Expectations of reward and efficacy guide cognitive control allocation.

Authors:  R Frömer; H Lin; C K Dean Wolf; M Inzlicht; A Shenhav
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-02-15       Impact factor: 14.919

4.  Group-Level EEG-Processing Pipeline for Flexible Single Trial-Based Analyses Including Linear Mixed Models.

Authors:  Romy Frömer; Martin Maier; Rasha Abdel Rahman
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2018-02-06       Impact factor: 4.677

5.  Combining Movement-Related Cortical Potentials and Event-Related Desynchronization to Study Movement Preparation and Execution.

Authors:  Hai Li; Gan Huang; Qiang Lin; Jiang-Li Zhao; Wai-Leung Ambrose Lo; Yu-Rong Mao; Ling Chen; Zhi-Guo Zhang; Dong-Feng Huang; Le Li
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2018-10-05       Impact factor: 4.003

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.