| Literature DB >> 27383800 |
Min Jeong Kim1, U Suk Jung1, Seung Woo Jeon1, Jae Sung Lee2, Won Seob Kim2, Sang Bum Lee3, Youn Chil Kim3, Bae Young Kim4, Tao Wang5, Hong Gu Lee2.
Abstract
This study was conducted to examine the effects of adding phytoncide oil extracted from Korean pine nut cone byproduct to the diet of dairy cows on milk yield and compositions, fatty acid characteristics, complete blood count and stress response. A total of 74 Holstein cows were used for 30 days and divided into two groups. Each group was given a basal diet (C) or an experimental diet containing phytoncide additives at 0.016% (T) in feed. The results showed that phytoncide feeding had no effect on milk yield. In addition, there were no observed effects on milk composition, but the ratio of fatty acid in milk was significantly affected by the phytoncide diet, and it showed a positive effect. Not only were the major functional fatty acids, conjugated linoleic acid and eicosapentaenoic acid increased, but also ω6:ω3 fatty acid ratio was reduced in milk of T group (p<0.05). In blood analysis, the complete blood count showed no significant difference between C and T group on all parameters. However, the cortisol concentration was significantly decreased in T group compared to control (p<0.05). Taken together, we suggest that phytoncide oil does not have a great influence on the physiological changes, but can be a potential feed additive that improves the milk fatty acid and stress resilience in dairy cows. In addition, it will contribute to the development of feed resource, a reduction in feed cost and a lessening of environmental pollution.Entities:
Keywords: Dairy Cow; Fatty Acids; Feed Additive; Milk; Phytoncide Oil
Year: 2016 PMID: 27383800 PMCID: PMC5088421 DOI: 10.5713/ajas.16.0281
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Asian-Australas J Anim Sci ISSN: 1011-2367 Impact factor: 2.509
Ingredient and chemical composition of the experimental diet
| Item | Diets | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
| Concentrates (9.2%) | Roughage (3.9%) | TMR (86.9%) | Phytoncide additive (Vehicle) | |
| Ingredient (%) | ||||
| Canola seed meal | 9.00 | |||
| Coconut kernel meal | 6.00 | |||
| Corn | 20.00 | |||
| Corn gluten feed | 13.60 | 5.00 | ||
| Dicalcium phospate | 0.20 | |||
| Limestone | 1.50 | |||
| MgO | 0.20 | |||
| Molasses | 6.00 | 1.50 | ||
| Parm kernel meal | 14.20 | 1.00 | ||
| Salt | 0.50 | |||
| Sesame seed meal | 2.00 | |||
| Sodium bicarbonate | 0.40 | |||
| Soybean meal | 10.00 | 2.00 | ||
| Tallow | 2.00 | |||
| Tapioca | 3.00 | |||
| Vitamin mineral premix | 0.40 | |||
| Wheat middling | 11.00 | |||
| Canola seed meal | 9.00 | |||
| Tall fescue hay | 100 | |||
| Alfalfa hay | 6.50 | |||
| Beet pulp | 2.50 | |||
| Concentrate | 18.00 | |||
| Corn flake | 9.00 | |||
| Cotton seed | 5.00 | |||
| Klein grass hay | 5.00 | |||
| Oaten hay | 13.00 | |||
| Timothy hay | 2.50 | |||
| Rice bran | 60 | |||
| Corn grit | 40 | |||
| Chemical composition | ||||
| DM (%) | 88.72 | 92.36 | 62.46 | |
| Crude protein (% of DM) | 19.6 | 5.62 | 9.61 | 11.26 |
| Ether extract (% of DM) | 4.75 | 1.44 | 3.71 | 8.74 |
| Crude fiber (% of DM) | 8.54 | 39.34 | 15.68 | 4.78 |
| Crude ash (% of DM) | 8.46 | 5.11 | 4.86 | 4.50 |
| NDF (% of DM) | 25.66 | 72.96 | 29.52 | |
| ADF (% of DM) | 11.1 | 43.6 | 18.08 | |
| Ca (% of DM)( | 1.27 | 0.17 | 0.52 | 0.12 |
| P (% of DM) | 0.64 | 0.14 | 0.27 | 1.00 |
| NEL (Mcal/kg of DM) | 2.10 | 2.08 | 2.15 | 2.32 |
TMR, total mixed ration; DM, dry matter; NDF, neutral detergent fiber; ADF, acid detergent fiber; ME, metabolizable energy; NEL, net energy value of feeds for lactation.
Vitamin mineral premix: Vit. A 1,000,000 IU; Vit. D3 100,000 IU; Vit. E 25,000 mg; I 150 mg; Co 150 mg; Cu 2,500 mg; Fe 6,250 mg; Mn 16,000 mg; Zn 10,000 mg; Se 150 mg.
NEL, Mcal/kg of DM was estimated based on NRC (2001).
Major composition of terpenes in phytoncide oil1
| No. | Item | % of total |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | gamma-Terpinene | 26.79 |
| 2 | Camphene | 3.47 |
| 3 | beta-Pinene | 16.15 |
| 4 | dl-Limonene | 19.60 |
| 5 | alpha-Terpinolene | 2.40 |
| 6 | Bornyl acetate | 2.38 |
| 7 | alpha-Longipinene | 1.79 |
| 8 | Copaene | 2.35 |
| 9 | Isolongifolene | 4.15 |
| 10 | Caryophyllene | 3.45 |
And 40 other minority components, etc.
Effect of dietary phytoncide on milk yield in dairy cows1
| Period (d) | Milk yield (kg) | |
|---|---|---|
|
| ||
| C | T | |
| 0 | 34.6±0.75 | 35.1±1.87 |
| 10 | 34.0±1.00 | 35.9±1.60 |
| 20 | 34.4±0.85 | 35.3±1.37 |
| 30 | 34.0±1.11 | 33.3±1.52 |
| 0–10 | 34.5±0.88 | 35.4±1.57 |
| 11–20 | 34.1±0.86 | 34.4±1.29 |
| 21–30 | 33.3±1.11 | 34.3±1.49 |
| 1–30 | 33.9±0.90 | 34.7±1.42 |
Values are expressed as mean±standard error of the mean (n = 37).
C, control; T, phytoncide (0.016%/feed).
Effect of dietary phytoncide on milk composition in dairy cows1
| Item | Day | C | T |
|---|---|---|---|
| Milk fat (%, kg/d) | 30 | 4.1±0.17 | 4.0±0.12 |
| (1.4±0.06) | (1.3±0.04) | ||
| 1 to 30 | 4.1±0.09 | 4.2±0.10 | |
| (1.4±0.04) | (1.5±0.06) | ||
| Milk protein (%, kg/d) | 30 | 3.1±0.09 | 3.1±0.07 |
| (1.1±0.03) | (1.0±0.03) | ||
| 1 to 30 | 3.1±0.04 | 3.0±0.03 | |
| (1.1±0.03) | (1.1±0.04) | ||
| Lactose (%, kg/d) | 30 | 4.8±0.05 | 4.8±0.04 |
| (1.6±0.05) | (1.6±0.05) | ||
| 1 to 30 | 4.7±0.02 | 4.8±0.03 | |
| (1.6±0.04) | (1.7±0.07) | ||
| SnF (%, kg/d) | 30 | 8.5±0.09 | 8.6±0.08 |
| (2.9±0.09) | (2.8±0.09) | ||
| 1 to 30 | 8.5±0.05 | 8.5±0.04 | |
| (2.9±0.08) | (3.0±0.12) | ||
| Somatic cells (1,000/mL) | 30 | 59.0±8.25 | 83.7±28.77 |
| 1 to 30 | 134.7±46.33 | 136.0±33.84 | |
| MUN (mg/dL) | 30 | 18.7±1.05 | 17.8±0.69 |
| 1 to 30 | 18.2±0.38 | 17.7±0.35 | |
| Aceton (mM) | 30 | 0.1±0.01 | 0.1±0.01 |
| 1 to 30 | 0.1±0.01 | 0.1±0.01 | |
| BHB (mM) | 30 | 0 | 0 |
| 1 to 30 | 0 | 0 |
SnF, solids non-fat; MUN, Milk urea nitrogen; BHB, beta-hydroxybutyrate.
Values are expressed as mean±standard error of the mean (n = 37),
p<0.05 by Student’s t test.
C, control; T, phytoncide (0.016%/feed).
Effect of dietary phytoncide on milk fatty acid contents in dairy cows1
| Fatty acids (% of total fatty acid) | C | T |
|---|---|---|
| C4:0 (Butryic) | 1.85±0.038 | 1.92±0.043 |
| C6:0 (Caproic) | 1.64±0.037 | 1.65±0.044 |
| C8:0 (Caprylic) | 1.07 ±0.042 | 1.04 ±0.052 |
| C10:0 (Capric) | 2.58 ±0.140 | 2.42 ±0.151 |
| C11:0 (Undecanoic) | 0.25 ±0.018 | 0.23 ±0.020 |
| C12:0 (Lauric) | 6.44 ±0.239 | 5.78 ±0.148 |
| C14:0 (Myristic) | 12.76 ±0.281 | 12.19 ±0.268 |
| C14:1 (Myristoleic) | 0.67 ±0.052 | 0.65 ±0.033 |
| C15:0 (Pentadecanoic) | 0.84 ±0.032 | 0.81 ±0.038 |
| C16:0 (Palmitic) | 29.90 ±0.530 | 29.56 ±0.310 |
| C16:1 (Palmitoleic) | 1.45 ±0.091 | 1.36 ±0.037 |
| C17:0 (Heptadecanoic) | 0.49 ±0.007 | 0.50 ±0.014 |
| C17:1 (cis-10-Heptadecenoic) | 0.09 ±0.006 | 0.11 ±0.008 |
| C18:0 (Stearic) | 14.25 ±0.709 | 15.25 ±0.497 |
| Trans vaccenic acid | 0.66 ±0.035 | 0.73 ±0.057 |
| C18:1n9c (Oleic) | 20.54 ±0.503 | 21.28 ±0.511 |
| C18:2n6t (Linolelaidic) | 0.23 ±0.023 | 0.21 ±0.016 |
| C18:2n6c (Linoleic) | 2.49 ±0.110 | 2.42 ±0.076 |
| C20:0 (Arachidic) | 0.25 ±0.009 | 0.25 ±0.007 |
| C18:3n6 (γ-Linolenic) | 0.04 ±0.001 | 0.04 ±0.002 |
| C20:1n9 (cis-11-Eicosenoic) | 0.06 ±0.008 | 0.06 ±0.006 |
| C18:3n3 (α-Linolenic) | 0.36 ±0.014 | 0.36 ±0.009 |
| cis-9, trans-11-CLA | 0.35 ±0.016 | 0.45 ±0.020 |
| C21:0(Henicosanoic) | 0.04 ±0.001 | 0.04 ±0.002 |
| trans-10, cis-12-CLA | 0.038 ±0.0012 | 0.042 ±0.0017 |
| C20:2 (cis-11,14-Eicosadienoic) | 0.05 ±0.001 | 0.05 ±0.002 |
| C22:0 (Behenic) | 0.05 ±0.002 | 0.06 ±0.004 |
| C20:3n6 (cis-8,11,14-Eicosatrienoic) | 0.15 ±0.005 | 0.16 ±0.003 |
| C22:1n9 (Erucic) | 0.09 ±0.002 | 0.08 ±0.006 |
| C20:4n6 (Arachidonic) | 0.16 ±0.008 | 0.14 ±0.016 |
| C23:0 (Tricosanoic) | 0.04 ±0.001 | 0.04 ±0.002 |
| C22:2 (cis-13,16-Docosadienoic) | 0.038 ±0.0012 | 0.042 ±0.0016 |
| C20:5n3 (cis-5,8,11,14,17-Eicosatrienoic) | 0.040 ±0.0013 | 0.045 ±0.0021 |
| C24:1n9 (Nervonic) | 0.04 ±0.001 | 0.04 ±0.002 |
| Total % | 100 | 100 |
| CLA | 0.39 ±0.017 | 0.50 ±0.020 |
| ω3 | 0.40 ±0.014 | 0.41 ±0.009 |
| ω6 | 3.07 ±0.102 | 2.97 ±0.081 |
| ω6/ω3 | 7.72 ±0.190 | 7.25 ±0.115 |
CLA, conjugated linoleic acid.
Values are expressed as mean±standard error of the mean (n = 37),
p<0.05 by Student’s t test.
C, control; T, phytoncide (0.016%/feed).
Effect of dietary phytoncide on complete blood count analysis in dairy cows1
| Item | C | T |
|---|---|---|
| WBC, 4 to 12 K/μL | 8.67±0.57 | 10.15±0.68 |
| Lymphocyte, 2.5 to 7.5 K/μL | 5.62±0.45 | 6.67±0.39 |
| Monocyte, 0 to 0.84 K/μL | 0.78±0.09 | 0.97±0.07 |
| Granulocyte, 0.6 to 6.7 K/μL | 2.33±0.19 | 2.41±0.42 |
| RBC, 5 to 10 M/μL | 6.41±0.23 | 6.44±0.24 |
| Hemoglobin, 8 to 15 g/dL | 11.81±0.37 | 11.86±0.35 |
| Hematocrit, 24% to 46% | 30.20±0.68 | 30.47±0.84 |
| MCV, 40 to 60 fL | 47.40±1.28 | 47.70±1.45 |
| MCH, 11 to 17 pg | 18.63±0.85 | 18.37±0.52 |
| MCHC, 30 to 36 g/dL | 39.19±1.30 | 38.60±0.82 |
| Platelet, 100 to 800 K/μL | 203.40±26.52 | 177.40±13.92 |
WBC, white blood cell; RBC, red blood cell; MCV, mean corpuscular volume; MCH, mean corpuscular hemoglobin; MCHC, mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration.
Values are expressed as mean±standard error of the mean (n = 10).
C, control; T, phytoncide (0.016%/feed).
Normal range.
Figure 1Effect of dietary phytoncide on level of serum cortisol in dairy cow. Values are expressed as mean±standard error of the mean (n = 10), * p<0.05 by Student’s t-test. 1 C, control; T, phytoncide (0.016%/feed).