Importance: Trauma patients are at high risk for developing venous thromboembolism (VTE). The VTE rate when enoxaparin sodium is dosed by anti-factor Xa (anti-Xa) trough level is not well described. Objective: To determine whether targeting a prophylactic anti-Xa trough level by adjusting the enoxaparin dose would reduce the VTE rate in trauma patients. Design, Setting, and Participants: Single-institution, historic vs prospective cohort comparison study at an urban, academic, level I trauma center. The prospective cohort was enrolled from August 2014 to May 2015 and compared with a historic cohort admitted from August 2013 to May 2014. Trauma patients who received enoxaparin adjusted by anti-Xa trough level (adjustment group) were compared with those who received enoxaparin sodium at a dosage of 30 mg twice daily (control group). Patients were excluded if they were younger than 18 years, had a length of hospital stay less than 2 days, or had preexisting deep vein thrombosis. Patients were excluded from the adjustment group for changes in the choice of thromboprophylaxis (heparin, enoxaparin once-daily dosing, early ambulation), hospital discharge before initial trough levels could be drawn, or incorrect timing of trough levels. Exposures: Anti-Xa trough levels were monitored in patients in the adjustment group receiving 3 or more consecutive doses of enoxaparin sodium, 30 mg twice daily. Patients with a trough level of 0.1 IU/mL or lower received enoxaparin sodium increased by 10-mg increments. After providing 3 adjusted doses of enoxaparin, the trough level was redrawn and the dosage was adjusted as necessary. Patients in the control group received enoxaparin sodium at a dosage of 30 mg twice daily without adjustments. Main Outcomes and Measures: Rates of symptomatic VTE (deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism, confirmed by duplex ultrasonography and chest computed tomographic angiography, respectively) and bleeding risk. Results: A total of 205 patients (mean [SD] age, 41.3 [18.2] years; 75.1% male) were studied, 87 in the adjustment group and 118 in the control group, with similar baseline characteristics and injury profiles. Subprophylactic anti-Xa troughs were noted in 73 of 87 patients (83.9%) in the adjustment group, and the majority of patients (57 of 87 patients [65.5%]) required dosage adjustment of enoxaparin sodium to 40 mg twice daily. Incidence of VTE was significantly lower in the adjustment group than in the control group (1.1% vs 7.6%, respectively; P = .046). When the adjustment group was compared with the control group, no significant difference was noted in the rate of packed red blood cell transfusion (6.9% vs 12.7%, respectively; P = .18) or mean (SD) hematocrit at discharge (34.5% [6.3%] vs 33.4% [6.8%], respectively [to convert to proportion of 1.0, multiply by 0.01]; P = .19). Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, subprophylactic anti-Xa trough levels were common in trauma patients. Enoxaparin dosage adjustment may lead to a reduced rate of VTE without an increased risk of bleeding.
Importance: Traumapatients are at high risk for developing venous thromboembolism (VTE). The VTE rate when enoxaparin sodium is dosed by anti-factor Xa (anti-Xa) trough level is not well described. Objective: To determine whether targeting a prophylactic anti-Xa trough level by adjusting the enoxaparin dose would reduce the VTE rate in traumapatients. Design, Setting, and Participants: Single-institution, historic vs prospective cohort comparison study at an urban, academic, level I trauma center. The prospective cohort was enrolled from August 2014 to May 2015 and compared with a historic cohort admitted from August 2013 to May 2014. Traumapatients who received enoxaparin adjusted by anti-Xa trough level (adjustment group) were compared with those who received enoxaparin sodium at a dosage of 30 mg twice daily (control group). Patients were excluded if they were younger than 18 years, had a length of hospital stay less than 2 days, or had preexisting deep vein thrombosis. Patients were excluded from the adjustment group for changes in the choice of thromboprophylaxis (heparin, enoxaparin once-daily dosing, early ambulation), hospital discharge before initial trough levels could be drawn, or incorrect timing of trough levels. Exposures: Anti-Xa trough levels were monitored in patients in the adjustment group receiving 3 or more consecutive doses of enoxaparin sodium, 30 mg twice daily. Patients with a trough level of 0.1 IU/mL or lower received enoxaparin sodium increased by 10-mg increments. After providing 3 adjusted doses of enoxaparin, the trough level was redrawn and the dosage was adjusted as necessary. Patients in the control group received enoxaparin sodium at a dosage of 30 mg twice daily without adjustments. Main Outcomes and Measures: Rates of symptomatic VTE (deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism, confirmed by duplex ultrasonography and chest computed tomographic angiography, respectively) and bleeding risk. Results: A total of 205 patients (mean [SD] age, 41.3 [18.2] years; 75.1% male) were studied, 87 in the adjustment group and 118 in the control group, with similar baseline characteristics and injury profiles. Subprophylactic anti-Xa troughs were noted in 73 of 87 patients (83.9%) in the adjustment group, and the majority of patients (57 of 87 patients [65.5%]) required dosage adjustment of enoxaparin sodium to 40 mg twice daily. Incidence of VTE was significantly lower in the adjustment group than in the control group (1.1% vs 7.6%, respectively; P = .046). When the adjustment group was compared with the control group, no significant difference was noted in the rate of packed red blood cell transfusion (6.9% vs 12.7%, respectively; P = .18) or mean (SD) hematocrit at discharge (34.5% [6.3%] vs 33.4% [6.8%], respectively [to convert to proportion of 1.0, multiply by 0.01]; P = .19). Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, subprophylactic anti-Xa trough levels were common in traumapatients. Enoxaparin dosage adjustment may lead to a reduced rate of VTE without an increased risk of bleeding.
Authors: Navpreet K Dhillon; Galinos Barmparas; Ting Lung Lin; Nikhil T Linaval; Audrey R Yang; Harveen K Sekhon; Russell Mason; Daniel R Margulies; Bruce L Gewertz; Eric J Ley Journal: World J Surg Date: 2020-11-09 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: Christopher J Pannucci; Kory I Fleming; Corinne B Bertolaccini; Ann Marie Prazak; Lyen C Huang; T Bartley Pickron Journal: JAMA Surg Date: 2019-08-01 Impact factor: 14.766
Authors: Samuel W Ross; Kali M Kuhlenschmidt; John C Kubasiak; Lindsey E Mossler; Luis R Taveras; Thomas H Shoultz; Herbert A Phelan; Caroline E Reinke; Michael W Cripps Journal: JAMA Surg Date: 2020-06-01 Impact factor: 14.766
Authors: Markus B Skrifvars; Michael Bailey; Jeffrey Presneill; Craig French; Alistair Nichol; Lorraine Little; Jacques Duranteau; Olivier Huet; Samir Haddad; Yaseen Arabi; Colin McArthur; D James Cooper; Rinaldo Bellomo Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2016-12-27 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Charles A Karcutskie; Arjuna Dharmaraja; Jaimin Patel; Sarah A Eidelson; Anish B Padiadpu; Arch G Martin; Gabriel Lama; Edward B Lineen; Nicholas Namias; Carl I Schulman; Kenneth G Proctor Journal: JAMA Surg Date: 2018-02-01 Impact factor: 14.766
Authors: Molly Elizabeth Droege; Christopher Allen Droege; Carolyn Dosen Philpott; Megan Leslie Webb; Neil Edward Ernst; Krishna Athota; Devin Wakefield; Joseph Richard Dowd; Dina Gomaa; Bryce H R Robinson; Dennis Hanseman; Joel Elterman; Eric William Mueller Journal: J Thromb Thrombolysis Date: 2021-05-12 Impact factor: 2.300
Authors: Navpreet K Dhillon; Yassar M Hashim; Naomi Berezin; Felix Yong; Geena Conde; Russell Mason; Eric J Ley Journal: Trauma Surg Acute Care Open Date: 2021-05-10