| Literature DB >> 27383508 |
Anping Cai1, Qi Zhong1, Chaofan Liu1, Dan Zhou1, Xida Li1, Ying Zhang1, Yingqing Feng1, Yingling Zhou1.
Abstract
Our objective was to evaluate the associations of the systolic and diastolic blood pressure night-to-day ratios (SBP-NDR and DBP-NDR) with composite atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases (ASCVDs) comprising coronary heart disease (CHD) and ischemic stroke (IS) cases, respectively. The clinical conditions associated with SBP-NDR and DBP-NDR were also evaluated. A total of 401 patients who underwent 24-h ambulatory BP monitoring were enrolled. In general, the mean age was 59.7±14.7 years and male subjects accounted for 59.1% of the study subjects. Regarding the ASCVD risk factors, 17.0% of the study subjects smoked, 5.2% abused alcohol, 2.0% had a family history of ASCVD, 23.3% had diabetes and 96.0% had dyslipidemia. Fifty (12.5%) and 128 (31.9%) study subjects had a previous diagnosis of CHD and IS, respectively. Dipper and non-dipper pattern-specific differences in clinical characteristics between the SBP-NDR and DBP-NDR categories were observed. The multiple linear regression analysis showed that advanced age, smoking, CHD and IS were positively associated with SBP-NDR and statins were inversely associated with SBP-NDR; only IS was positively associated with DBP-NDR. The logistic regression analysis showed that after adjusting for the covariates of age, smoking, alcohol abuse, diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidemia, and SBP and DBP at admission, only DBP-NDR remained significantly associated with composite ASCVD, with an odds ratio of 1.029 (95% confidence interval 1.002-1.056, P=0.038). There were significant differences in the associations of SBP-NDR and DBP-NDR with composite ASCVD. Clinical conditions independently associated with SBP-NDR and DBP-NDR were also somewhat different. In a specific population group, DBP-NDR may be superior to SBP-NDR with respect to screening for ASCVD.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27383508 DOI: 10.1038/hr.2016.82
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Hypertens Res ISSN: 0916-9636 Impact factor: 3.872