Kourosh Jafari-Khouzani1, Franziska Loebel1, Wolfgang Bogner1, Otto Rapalino1, Gilberto R Gonzalez1, Elizabeth Gerstner1, Andrew S Chi1, Tracy T Batchelor1, Bruce R Rosen1, Jan Unkelbach1, Helen A Shih1, Daniel P Cahill1, Ovidiu C Andronesi1. 1. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts (K.J.-K., W.B., B.R.R., O.C.A.); Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts (F.L., D.P.C.); Department of Neurosurgery, Charité Medical University, Berlin, Germany (F.L.); High Field MR Center, Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria (W.B.); Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts (O.R., G.R.G.); Pappas Center of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts (E.G., A.S.C., T.T.B.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts (J.U., H.A.S.).
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Gliomas with mutant isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) produce high levels of 2-hydroxyglutarate (2HG) that can be quantitatively measured by 3D magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging (MRSI). Current glioma MRI primarily relies upon fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) hyperintensity for treatment planning, although this lacks specificity for tumor cells. Here, we investigated the relationship between 2HG and FLAIR in mutant IDH glioma patients to determine whether 2HG mapping is valuable for radiotherapy planning. METHODS: Seventeen patients with mutant IDH1 gliomas were imaged by 3 T MRI. A 3D MRSI sequence was employed to specifically image 2HG. FLAIR imaging was performed using standard clinical protocol. Regions of interest (ROIs) were determined for FLAIR and optimally thresholded 2HG hyperintensities. The overlap, displacement, and volumes of 2HG and FLAIR ROIs were calculated. RESULTS: In 8 of 17 (47%) patients, the 2HG volume was larger than FLAIR volume. Across the entire cohort, the mean volume of 2HG was 35.3 cc (range, 5.3-92.7 cc), while the mean volume of FLAIR was 35.8 cc (range, 6.3-140.8 cc). FLAIR and 2HG ROIs had mean overlap of 0.28 (Dice coefficients range, 0.03-0.57) and mean displacement of 12.2 mm (range, 3.2-23.5 mm) between their centers of mass. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that for a substantial number of patients, the 2HG volumetric assessment of tumor burden is more extensive than FLAIR volume. In addition, there is only partial overlap and asymmetric displacement between the centers of FLAIR and 2HG ROIs. These results may have important implications for radiotherapy planning of IDH mutant glioma.
BACKGROUND:Gliomas with mutant isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) produce high levels of 2-hydroxyglutarate (2HG) that can be quantitatively measured by 3D magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging (MRSI). Current glioma MRI primarily relies upon fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) hyperintensity for treatment planning, although this lacks specificity for tumor cells. Here, we investigated the relationship between 2HG and FLAIR in mutant IDH gliomapatients to determine whether 2HG mapping is valuable for radiotherapy planning. METHODS: Seventeen patients with mutant IDH1gliomas were imaged by 3 T MRI. A 3D MRSI sequence was employed to specifically image 2HG. FLAIR imaging was performed using standard clinical protocol. Regions of interest (ROIs) were determined for FLAIR and optimally thresholded 2HG hyperintensities. The overlap, displacement, and volumes of 2HG and FLAIR ROIs were calculated. RESULTS: In 8 of 17 (47%) patients, the 2HG volume was larger than FLAIR volume. Across the entire cohort, the mean volume of 2HG was 35.3 cc (range, 5.3-92.7 cc), while the mean volume of FLAIR was 35.8 cc (range, 6.3-140.8 cc). FLAIR and 2HG ROIs had mean overlap of 0.28 (Dice coefficients range, 0.03-0.57) and mean displacement of 12.2 mm (range, 3.2-23.5 mm) between their centers of mass. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that for a substantial number of patients, the 2HG volumetric assessment of tumor burden is more extensive than FLAIR volume. In addition, there is only partial overlap and asymmetric displacement between the centers of FLAIR and 2HG ROIs. These results may have important implications for radiotherapy planning of IDH mutant glioma.
Authors: M J van den Bent; J S Wefel; D Schiff; M J B Taphoorn; K Jaeckle; L Junck; T Armstrong; A Choucair; A D Waldman; T Gorlia; M Chamberlain; B G Baumert; M A Vogelbaum; D R Macdonald; D A Reardon; P Y Wen; S M Chang; A H Jacobs Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2011-04-05 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: J A Carrillo; A Lai; P L Nghiemphu; H J Kim; H S Phillips; S Kharbanda; P Moftakhar; S Lalaezari; W Yong; B M Ellingson; T F Cloughesy; W B Pope Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2012-02-09 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: D Williams Parsons; Siân Jones; Xiaosong Zhang; Jimmy Cheng-Ho Lin; Rebecca J Leary; Philipp Angenendt; Parminder Mankoo; Hannah Carter; I-Mei Siu; Gary L Gallia; Alessandro Olivi; Roger McLendon; B Ahmed Rasheed; Stephen Keir; Tatiana Nikolskaya; Yuri Nikolsky; Dana A Busam; Hanna Tekleab; Luis A Diaz; James Hartigan; Doug R Smith; Robert L Strausberg; Suely Kazue Nagahashi Marie; Sueli Mieko Oba Shinjo; Hai Yan; Gregory J Riggins; Darell D Bigner; Rachel Karchin; Nick Papadopoulos; Giovanni Parmigiani; Bert Vogelstein; Victor E Velculescu; Kenneth W Kinzler Journal: Science Date: 2008-09-04 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Changho Choi; Sandeep K Ganji; Ralph J DeBerardinis; Kimmo J Hatanpaa; Dinesh Rakheja; Zoltan Kovacs; Xiao-Li Yang; Tomoyuki Mashimo; Jack M Raisanen; Isaac Marin-Valencia; Juan M Pascual; Christopher J Madden; Bruce E Mickey; Craig R Malloy; Robert M Bachoo; Elizabeth A Maher Journal: Nat Med Date: 2012-01-26 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: Hui Mao; Erwin G Van Meir; Juliya Kalinina; Anne Carroll; Liya Wang; Qiqi Yu; Danny E Mancheno; Shaoxiong Wu; Frank Liu; Jun Ahn; Miao He Journal: J Mol Med (Berl) Date: 2012-03-17 Impact factor: 5.606
Authors: Victor A Levin; Lauren E Abrey; Timothy P Heffron; Peter J Tonge; Arvin C Dar; William A Weiss; James M Gallo Journal: CNS Oncol Date: 2017-07-18
Authors: Zhongxu An; Vivek Tiwari; Jeannie Baxter; Michael Levy; Kimmo J Hatanpaa; Edward Pan; Elizabeth A Maher; Toral R Patel; Bruce E Mickey; Changho Choi Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2018-09-14 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Andrew A Maudsley; Ovidiu C Andronesi; Peter B Barker; Alberto Bizzi; Wolfgang Bogner; Anke Henning; Sarah J Nelson; Stefan Posse; Dikoma C Shungu; Brian J Soher Journal: NMR Biomed Date: 2020-04-29 Impact factor: 4.044
Authors: Ovidiu C Andronesi; Pallab K Bhattacharyya; Wolfgang Bogner; In-Young Choi; Aaron T Hess; Phil Lee; Ernesta M Meintjes; M Dylan Tisdall; Maxim Zaitzev; André van der Kouwe Journal: NMR Biomed Date: 2020-07-20 Impact factor: 4.044
Authors: Xianqi Li; Bernhard Strasser; Kourosh Jafari-Khouzani; Bijaya Thapa; Julia Small; Daniel P Cahill; Jorg Dietrich; Tracy T Batchelor; Ovidiu C Andronesi Journal: Radiology Date: 2020-01-07 Impact factor: 29.146